BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 194A(3)(viia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai31Mumbai22Bangalore12Amritsar7Delhi6Visakhapatnam5Cuttack5Kolkata4Pune1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 115J14Section 4012Section 36(1)(viia)8Section 194C8Deduction6Disallowance6Addition to Income6Section 365Section 36(1)(vii)4Section 36(1)

M/S. DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,SAHARANPUR vs. DCIT, SAHARANPUR

The appeal is allowed with above direction

ITA 1740/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Feb 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava & Shri Prashant Maharishidistrict Co-Operative Bank Ltd. Dy. Cit, Railway Road, Vs. Saharanpur – 247 001. Saharanpur – 247 001 [U.P.] Uttar Pradesh. Pan : Aaaad5431D (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Mohd. Sarfaraz, AsstFor Respondent: N O N E
Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(viia)Section 40

viia) of the Act. As apparent from the record that annual accounts were revised on 26.02.2016, whereas the order was passed under Section 143(3) of the Act on 17.03.2016. Therefore, such accounts naturally could not have been before the Assessing Officer. The learned CIT (Appeals) also did not consider the fact that whether such a revision of accounts

4
Natural Justice4
Section 194A3

RAM GARHIA CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 63(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the Appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 6792/DEL/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Dr. B.R.R. Kumar & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 6792/Del/2018 (A.Y 2013-14)

For Appellant: ShriFor Respondent: Shri Girish Kohli
Section 194ASection 36Section 40

viia) Rs.14,31,781/- V. Disallowance out of Entertainment Expenses Rs. 59,480 /- VI. Disallowance out of staff welfare Expenses Rs.4,085/- VII. Disallowance out of Miscellaneous Expenses Rs. 1,30,778/- VIII. Disallowance out of Honorarium Expenses Rs.1.58,719/- IX. Disallowance out of General body meeting Expenses Rs.41,184/- X. Disallowance out of Repairs and renovation Expenses ' Rs.1

DCIT, CIRCLE - 19(1), DELHI vs. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK, MAHARASHTRA

In the result, appeal of assessee in ITA No

ITA 3039/DEL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri K. Sampath, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Jitender Singh, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 36(1)Section 36(1)(via)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)

viia). 7. With respect to the ground relating to the applicability of provisions of section 115JB, the ld AR stated that the provisions of the section 115JB was not applicable to them. 8. Per contra, the ld. DR relied on the orders of the authorities below. 9. We have heard the rival submissions and have perused the relevant material

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK,DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-19(1), DELHI

In the result, appeal of assessee in ITA No

ITA 2712/DEL/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri K. Sampath, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Jitender Singh, CIT-DR
Section 115JSection 36(1)Section 36(1)(via)Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)

viia). 7. With respect to the ground relating to the applicability of provisions of section 115JB, the ld AR stated that the provisions of the section 115JB was not applicable to them. 8. Per contra, the ld. DR relied on the orders of the authorities below. 9. We have heard the rival submissions and have perused the relevant material

DCIT, RISHIKESH vs. ZILA SAHAKARI BANK LTD., UTTRAKHAND

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 2906/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. N. K. Billaiya & Ms Suchitra Kamble(Through Video Conferencing)

Section 143Section 143(2)Section 194ASection 194CSection 36Section 36(1)Section 40

section 194C without appreciating the facts that the assessee has failed to prove its claim that the payments were out of scope of Sec. 194C. 3. The Ld. CIT (Appeals) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance made by the A.O. u/s 36(l)(viia) on account of facts that wrong claim was made

ZILA SAHAKARI BANK LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, KOTDWAR

Appeal is dismissed

ITA 3220/DEL/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Sept 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. N. K. Billaiya & Ms Suchitra Kamble(Through Video Conferencing)

Section 143Section 143(2)Section 194ASection 194CSection 36Section 36(1)Section 40

section 194C without appreciating the facts that the assessee has failed to prove its claim that the payments were out of scope of Sec. 194C. 3. The Ld. CIT (Appeals) has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance made by the A.O. u/s 36(l)(viia) on account of facts that wrong claim was made