BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3,345 results for “disallowance”+ Section 13(1)(d)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai4,640Delhi3,345Chennai1,406Bangalore1,046Ahmedabad935Jaipur805Kolkata622Hyderabad606Pune439Indore412Surat346Chandigarh308Cochin291Visakhapatnam268Raipur266Nagpur193Rajkot193Lucknow160SC133Cuttack115Panaji98Ranchi82Amritsar77Allahabad75Jodhpur67Patna65Guwahati55Agra51Dehradun24Jabalpur22Varanasi11A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN5H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1RANJAN GOGOI PRAFULLA C. PANT1D.K. JAIN JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR1MADAN B. LOKUR S.A. BOBDE1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1ANIL R. DAVE AMITAVA ROY L. NAGESWARA RAO1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Addition to Income68Section 143(3)64Section 153A50Disallowance48Section 14A42Deduction28Section 14719Section 3519Section 37(1)18Section 68

RICHMOND EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,NOIDA vs. DCIT/ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, GHAZIABAD, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed

ITA 4779/DEL/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Mar 2026AY 2024-25
For Respondent: \nShri Gaurav Jain, Adv
Section 12ASection 132Section 143(3)Section 2(15)

d) any income which is deemed to be income under the twenty-first\nproviso to clause (23C) of section 10 or which is not excluded from the\ntotal income under clause (c) of sub-section (1) of section 13; or\n(e) any income which is not excluded from the total income under clause\n(c) of sub-section (1

DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) vs. CHARANJIV CHARITABLE TRUST

In the result both aspects of the first substantial question of law

Showing 1–20 of 3,345 · Page 1 of 168

...
18
Section 153C18
Search & Seizure18
ITA/321/2013HC Delhi18 Mar 2014

Bench: It, Two By The Assessee Relating To The Assessment Years 2006-07 & 2007-08 & One By The Revenue Relating To The Assessment Year 2006-07. In Other Words, In Respect Of The Assessment Year 2006-07, There Were Cross- 2014:Dhc:1467-Db

Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(3)Section 143(1)Section 260A

disallowance of the exemption under Section 11 on the ground of violation of Section 13(1)(c)(ii) read with Section 13(3). According to him, both in respect of the advances made to APIL and the debit balances in the account of Charanjiv Educational Society, there was a violation of the above statutory provisions disentitling the assessee from

MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED,DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1)(1), MEERUT

In the result, the additional Ground No

ITA 2313/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia

For Appellant: Shri Gaurav Jain, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT (DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144C(13)Section 153(3)Section 270ASection 35Section 80GSection 80I

D E R PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA-AM: The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the assessee against the final assessment order dated 28.07.2022 passed under Section 143(3) r.w. Section 144C(13) r.w. Section 144B of the Income Tax Act (in short ‘the Act’) in pursuance of directions issued by Dispute Resolution Panel (DRP) dated

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. PTC INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15

ITA 2175/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year 2013-14 & Asstt. Year 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR
Section 234BSection 36(1)(viii)Section 37

d) The appellant craves to be allowed to add any fresh ground(s) of appeal and/or delete or amend any of the ground(s) of appeal Assessee’s Grounds of Appeal- AY 2014-15 “1. That the additions/disallowances made and sustained by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) are illegal and bad in law. 2. That in view

ADDL. CIT, SPECIAL RANGE- 7, NEW DELHI vs. PTC INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15

ITA 7433/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year 2013-14 & Asstt. Year 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR
Section 234BSection 36(1)(viii)Section 37

d) The appellant craves to be allowed to add any fresh ground(s) of appeal and/or delete or amend any of the ground(s) of appeal Assessee’s Grounds of Appeal- AY 2014-15 “1. That the additions/disallowances made and sustained by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) are illegal and bad in law. 2. That in view

M/S. PTC INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15

ITA 2162/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year 2013-14 & Asstt. Year 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR
Section 234BSection 36(1)(viii)Section 37

d) The appellant craves to be allowed to add any fresh ground(s) of appeal and/or delete or amend any of the ground(s) of appeal Assessee’s Grounds of Appeal- AY 2014-15 “1. That the additions/disallowances made and sustained by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) are illegal and bad in law. 2. That in view

PTC INDIA FINANCIAL SERVICES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE- 19(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for AY 2013-14 and 2014-15

ITA 7273/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 Nov 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year 2013-14 & Asstt. Year 2014-15

For Appellant: Shri Salil Kapoor, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR
Section 234BSection 36(1)(viii)Section 37

d) The appellant craves to be allowed to add any fresh ground(s) of appeal and/or delete or amend any of the ground(s) of appeal Assessee’s Grounds of Appeal- AY 2014-15 “1. That the additions/disallowances made and sustained by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) are illegal and bad in law. 2. That in view

EBRO INDIA PVT.LTD. ,DELHI vs. ACIT CIRCLE-7(1), DELHI

In the result, the ground no 4 raised by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1291/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: HeardITAT Delhi09 Sept 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: SHRI S.RIFAUR RAHMAN (Accountant Member), SHRI YOGESH KUMAR U.S. (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri Rohit Jain, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Rajesh Kumar, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144CSection 68

disallowances have been made contrary to the dictum laid down by various Courts. 12. Each of the aforesaid contention is briefly elaborated hereunder: Re (a): Assessment completed without issuance of show cause notice cum draft assessment order prior to draft order passed under section 144C(1) of the Act and without providing opportunity of hearing is bad in law 13

SUDHAKAR ARORA,DELHI vs. ADIT, CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 4584/DEL/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Sunil Kumar Singh & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2018-19]

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 36Section 36(1)(va)

d) to 143(1) of the Act). Secondly, the counsel argued that the issue at the time when the disallowance was made, issue was debatable and accordingly could not be the subject matter of disallowance under section 143(1) of the Act. 15. Regarding the argument that the auditors did not specifically mention in the audit report regarding inadmissibility

NOBLE WELFARE AND CHRITABLE TRUST,DELHI vs. ITO WARD EXEMP-2(4), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal is dismissed

ITA 9844/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Nov 2022AY 2016-17
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(1)(d)

13(1)(d) of the Act. Accordingly, he disallowed 50% of the interest expenditure. Against the assessment order so passed, assessee preferred an appeal before learned Commissioner (Appeals). 5 ITA No. 9844/Del./2019 However, finding no merit in the appeal of the assessee, learned Commissioner (Appeals) dismissed the appeal. 6. I have considered the submissions of learned Departmental Representative

ORIENT CRAFT LTD. ,DELHI vs. ASST. DIT, CPC , BANGALORE

ITA 477/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 May 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharmaita No. 477/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2019-20 Orient Craft Ltd., Vs Asstt. Dit, C/O M/S Rra Taxindia, Cpc, D-28, South Extension, Bangalore Part-I, New Delhi-110049 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaaco0068M Assessee By : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. & Sh. Somil Agarwal, Adv. Revenue By : Ms. Rinku Singh, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 04.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 05.05.2022

For Appellant: Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. &For Respondent: Ms. Rinku Singh, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

D-28, South Extension, Bangalore Part-I, New Delhi-110049 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAACO0068M Assessee by : Dr. Rakesh Gupta, Adv. & Sh. Somil Agarwal, Adv. Revenue by : Ms. Rinku Singh, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 04.05.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 05.05.2022 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: The present appeal has been filed by the assessee against

MAGIC AUTO PVT. LTD. ,DELHI vs. CENTRAL CIRCLE 13 , DELHI

ITA 27/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Sh. A. D. Jaindr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 27/Del/2022 : Asstt. Year : 2019-20 Magic Auto Pvt. Ltd., Vs Adit, 7/56, Desh Bandhu Gupta Cpc, Road, Karol Bagh, Central Delhi, Delhi-110005 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaacm4873C Assessee By : Sh. Salil Kapoor, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. N. K. Bansal, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 12.05.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 27.06.2022

For Appellant: Sh. Salil Kapoor, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. N. K. Bansal, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 2Section 28Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

13 OF 2021] An Act to give effect to the financial proposals of the Central Government for the financial year 2021-2022.BE it enacted by Parliament in the Seventy-second Year of the Republic of India as follows:— CHAPTER I PRELIMINARY Short title and commencement. 1. (1) This Act may be called the Finance Act, 2021. (2) Save as otherwise provided

TRUTECH CONSTRUCTIONS PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CPC, BANGALORE

ITA 1913/DEL/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

D-19, New Delhi Kalkaji, New Delhi- 110019 PAN-AABCU4368H 2. 1772/Del/2020 Vikas Publishing House DCIT, 2018-19 Ms. Richa Pvt. Ltd., A-27, 2nd CPC, Chawla, CA Floor, Mohan Co- Bengaluru operative Estate, New Delhi-110044 PAN-AAACV0006A 3. 1831/Del/2020 Tech Auto Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 2018-19 Sh. Ashwani 103, Pratap Bhawan, CPC, Kumar, CA & Bahadurshah Zafar Bengaluru

UTTAM INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-25(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 1911/DEL/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

D-19, New Delhi Kalkaji, New Delhi- 110019 PAN-AABCU4368H 2. 1772/Del/2020 Vikas Publishing House DCIT, 2018-19 Ms. Richa Pvt. Ltd., A-27, 2nd CPC, Chawla, CA Floor, Mohan Co- Bengaluru operative Estate, New Delhi-110044 PAN-AAACV0006A 3. 1831/Del/2020 Tech Auto Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 2018-19 Sh. Ashwani 103, Pratap Bhawan, CPC, Kumar, CA & Bahadurshah Zafar Bengaluru

TRUTUFF FACILITY MANAGEMENT PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CPC, BANGALORE

ITA 1851/DEL/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

D-19, New Delhi Kalkaji, New Delhi- 110019 PAN-AABCU4368H 2. 1772/Del/2020 Vikas Publishing House DCIT, 2018-19 Ms. Richa Pvt. Ltd., A-27, 2nd CPC, Chawla, CA Floor, Mohan Co- Bengaluru operative Estate, New Delhi-110044 PAN-AAACV0006A 3. 1831/Del/2020 Tech Auto Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 2018-19 Sh. Ashwani 103, Pratap Bhawan, CPC, Kumar, CA & Bahadurshah Zafar Bengaluru

TECH AUTO PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CPC, BANGALORE

ITA 1831/DEL/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

D-19, New Delhi Kalkaji, New Delhi- 110019 PAN-AABCU4368H 2. 1772/Del/2020 Vikas Publishing House DCIT, 2018-19 Ms. Richa Pvt. Ltd., A-27, 2nd CPC, Chawla, CA Floor, Mohan Co- Bengaluru operative Estate, New Delhi-110044 PAN-AAACV0006A 3. 1831/Del/2020 Tech Auto Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 2018-19 Sh. Ashwani 103, Pratap Bhawan, CPC, Kumar, CA & Bahadurshah Zafar Bengaluru

VIKAS PUBLISHING HOUSE PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CPC, BENGALURU

ITA 1772/DEL/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

D-19, New Delhi Kalkaji, New Delhi- 110019 PAN-AABCU4368H 2. 1772/Del/2020 Vikas Publishing House DCIT, 2018-19 Ms. Richa Pvt. Ltd., A-27, 2nd CPC, Chawla, CA Floor, Mohan Co- Bengaluru operative Estate, New Delhi-110044 PAN-AAACV0006A 3. 1831/Del/2020 Tech Auto Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 2018-19 Sh. Ashwani 103, Pratap Bhawan, CPC, Kumar, CA & Bahadurshah Zafar Bengaluru

TOSHIBA WATER SOLUTIONS & SERVICES PVT LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-27(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 1754/DEL/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi01 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Anubhav Sharma

For Respondent: Sh. M. Baranwal, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

D-19, New Delhi Kalkaji, New Delhi- 110019 PAN-AABCU4368H 2. 1772/Del/2020 Vikas Publishing House DCIT, 2018-19 Ms. Richa Pvt. Ltd., A-27, 2nd CPC, Chawla, CA Floor, Mohan Co- Bengaluru operative Estate, New Delhi-110044 PAN-AAACV0006A 3. 1831/Del/2020 Tech Auto Pvt. Ltd., DCIT, 2018-19 Sh. Ashwani 103, Pratap Bhawan, CPC, Kumar, CA & Bahadurshah Zafar Bengaluru

PRABHU SARAN GARG CHARITABLE TRUST,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT, GHAZIABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 3558/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi11 Aug 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarsh. Yogesh Kumar Usita No. 3558/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year 2010-11 Prabhu Saran Garg Charitable Vs. Jcit, Trust, C/O M/S O.P. Sapra & Range-2, Associates, C-763, New Friends Ghaziabad Colony, New Delhi-110025 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaatp9634M Assessee By : Sh. Akhilesh Kumar, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Girish Kumar Kohali, Sr. Dr Date Of Hearing: 26.07.2022 Date Of Pronouncement: 11.08.2022

For Appellant: Sh. Akhilesh Kumar, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Girish Kumar Kohali, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 13(1)(d)Section 143(3)Section 80G

disallowing exemption claimed. 2. That, learned commissioner of income tax (Appeals) manifestly erred in rejecting the contention that alleged advances made to three 2 Prabhu Saran Garg Charitable Trust unrelated parties are not ‘investment or deposit’ so as to hit by provisions of S. 13(1)(d) of Act as per the settled law. 3. That, learned commissioner of income

RANBIR SINGH SOROUT,FARIDABAD vs. ITO, WARD-2(2), FARIDABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed

ITA 54/DEL/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Aug 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 37(1)Section 43

D E R PER C.N. PRASAD, J.M. These appeals are filed by the Assessee against different orders of the Ld. CIT(Appeals)-NFAC, Delhi dated 11.11.2022 for the assessment years 2017-18, 2018-19 and 2019-20 in sustaining the disallowance of employees contribution to PF & ESI u/s 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 43B of the Income Tax Act. Assessee