BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

47 results for “depreciation”+ Section 69Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai49Delhi47Jaipur20Bangalore17Ahmedabad12Pune9Indore7Chandigarh7Cochin7Rajkot6Hyderabad6Surat5Visakhapatnam5Guwahati3Chennai3SC2Amritsar2Kolkata2Dehradun1Kerala1Allahabad1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 14336Section 153A32Addition to Income26Section 6825Search & Seizure16Section 13912Section 6910Section 115B10Section 69B7Section 263

ACE INFRACITY DEVELOPERS P.LTD,GHAZIABAD vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, NOIDA

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 1087/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi05 Mar 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Ms Suchitra Kamble & Dr. B. R. R. Kumar

Section 115BSection 132Section 2Section 69

depreciation requires to be confirmed and relied upon the assessment order and the order of the CIT(A). 7. We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. The submission made by the Ld. AR related to CBDT Circular No. 11/2019 dated 19/06/2019 are very much relevant in the present appeal before us. Before that Section

HEMLA EMBROIDERY MILLS PVT. LTD.,FARIDABAD vs. ACIT, FARIDABAD

In the result appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Showing 1–20 of 47 · Page 1 of 3

6
Set Off of Losses6
Undisclosed Income5
ITA 1491/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: Disposed
ITAT Delhi
05 Apr 2016
AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishihemla Embroidery Mills Pvt. Dcit, Ltd., Circle-I, Vs. 14/6, Mathura Road, Faridabad Faridabad Pan:Aaach4302B Dcit, (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Sh.MP. Rastogi, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Shravan Gotra

69B does not contain identical provision as contained in section 69C of the act. For the purposes of allowance of depreciation

ACIT, CC-14, DELHI vs. MAYFAIR RESORTS INDIA LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 2008/DEL/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Aug 2023AY 2010-11
For Appellant: Shri Yudhister Mehtani, CAFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty, CIT(DR)
Section 292CSection 69Section 69A

69B of the Act, the burden is on the Revenue to prove that the real investment exceeds the investments shown in the books of accounts of the appellant. As observed by the Apex Court in K.P. Varghese v. ITO /19811 131 ITR 597', to throw the burden of showing that there is no understatement of the consideration received

ACIT, CC-15, NEW DELHI vs. YASH PAL MENDIRATTA, DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the Cross Objections of the assessees are also dismissed

ITA 1863/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Mar 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Sh. Amit Goel, CA &For Respondent: Ms. Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 69

69B of the Act, the burden is on the Revenue to prove that the real investment exceeds the investments shown in the books of accounts of the appellant. As observed by the Apex Court in K.P. Varghese v. ITO [1981] 131 ITR 597. to throw the burden of showing that there is no understatement of the consideration received

ACIT, CIRCLE CC 15, NEW DELHI vs. ALKA MENDIRATTA , DELHI

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue are dismissed and the Cross Objections of the assessees are also dismissed

ITA 1864/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi08 Mar 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Dr. B. R. R. Kumarms. Astha Chandra

For Appellant: Sh. Amit Goel, CA &For Respondent: Ms. Sapna Bhatia, CIT-DR
Section 153ASection 69

69B of the Act, the burden is on the Revenue to prove that the real investment exceeds the investments shown in the books of accounts of the appellant. As observed by the Apex Court in K.P. Varghese v. ITO [1981] 131 ITR 597. to throw the burden of showing that there is no understatement of the consideration received

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD (FORMELY KNOWN AS NEEL AUTO PVT LTD), NEW DELHI

ITA 274/DEL/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here in after referred as ‘the Act’) was carried out on JBM group of cases group of cases on 05.10.2017. Both the assessee being part of JBM Group were also subjected to search. As such, notices u/s 153A dated 21.08.2019 of the Act were issued to the assessee’s, after which

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 303/DEL/2021[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here in after referred as ‘the Act’) was carried out on JBM group of cases group of cases on 05.10.2017. Both the assessee being part of JBM Group were also subjected to search. As such, notices u/s 153A dated 21.08.2019 of the Act were issued to the assessee’s, after which

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD (FORMELY KNOWN AS NEEL AUTO PVT LTD), NEW DELHI

ITA 273/DEL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here in after referred as ‘the Act’) was carried out on JBM group of cases group of cases on 05.10.2017. Both the assessee being part of JBM Group were also subjected to search. As such, notices u/s 153A dated 21.08.2019 of the Act were issued to the assessee’s, after which

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD (FORMELY KNOWN AS NEEL AUTO PVT LTD), NEW DELHI

ITA 299/DEL/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here in after referred as ‘the Act’) was carried out on JBM group of cases group of cases on 05.10.2017. Both the assessee being part of JBM Group were also subjected to search. As such, notices u/s 153A dated 21.08.2019 of the Act were issued to the assessee’s, after which

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 304/DEL/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here in after referred as ‘the Act’) was carried out on JBM group of cases group of cases on 05.10.2017. Both the assessee being part of JBM Group were also subjected to search. As such, notices u/s 153A dated 21.08.2019 of the Act were issued to the assessee’s, after which

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD (FORMELY KNOWN AS NEEL AUTO PVT LTD), NEW DELHI

ITA 296/DEL/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here in after referred as ‘the Act’) was carried out on JBM group of cases group of cases on 05.10.2017. Both the assessee being part of JBM Group were also subjected to search. As such, notices u/s 153A dated 21.08.2019 of the Act were issued to the assessee’s, after which

NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

ITA 238/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here in after referred as ‘the Act’) was carried out on JBM group of cases group of cases on 05.10.2017. Both the assessee being part of JBM Group were also subjected to search. As such, notices u/s 153A dated 21.08.2019 of the Act were issued to the assessee’s, after which

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD (FORMELY KNOWN AS NEEL AUTO PVT LTD), NEW DELHI

ITA 295/DEL/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here in after referred as ‘the Act’) was carried out on JBM group of cases group of cases on 05.10.2017. Both the assessee being part of JBM Group were also subjected to search. As such, notices u/s 153A dated 21.08.2019 of the Act were issued to the assessee’s, after which

NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

ITA 239/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here in after referred as ‘the Act’) was carried out on JBM group of cases group of cases on 05.10.2017. Both the assessee being part of JBM Group were also subjected to search. As such, notices u/s 153A dated 21.08.2019 of the Act were issued to the assessee’s, after which

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD (FORMELY KNOWN AS NEEL AUTO PVT LTD), NEW DELHI

ITA 300/DEL/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here in after referred as ‘the Act’) was carried out on JBM group of cases group of cases on 05.10.2017. Both the assessee being part of JBM Group were also subjected to search. As such, notices u/s 153A dated 21.08.2019 of the Act were issued to the assessee’s, after which

NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD (FORMELY KNOWN AS NEEL AUTO PVT LTD),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI

ITA 240/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here in after referred as ‘the Act’) was carried out on JBM group of cases group of cases on 05.10.2017. Both the assessee being part of JBM Group were also subjected to search. As such, notices u/s 153A dated 21.08.2019 of the Act were issued to the assessee’s, after which

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 301/DEL/2021[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here in after referred as ‘the Act’) was carried out on JBM group of cases group of cases on 05.10.2017. Both the assessee being part of JBM Group were also subjected to search. As such, notices u/s 153A dated 21.08.2019 of the Act were issued to the assessee’s, after which

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 302/DEL/2021[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here in after referred as ‘the Act’) was carried out on JBM group of cases group of cases on 05.10.2017. Both the assessee being part of JBM Group were also subjected to search. As such, notices u/s 153A dated 21.08.2019 of the Act were issued to the assessee’s, after which

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD (FORMELY KNOWN AS NEEL AUTO PVT LTD), NEW DELHI

ITA 275/DEL/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here in after referred as ‘the Act’) was carried out on JBM group of cases group of cases on 05.10.2017. Both the assessee being part of JBM Group were also subjected to search. As such, notices u/s 153A dated 21.08.2019 of the Act were issued to the assessee’s, after which

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-25, NEW DELHI vs. NEEL METAL PRODUCTS LTD, NEW DELHI

ITA 305/DEL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jul 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr.AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Subhra Jyoti Chakraborty

section 132(1) of the Income Tax Act 1961 (here in after referred as ‘the Act’) was carried out on JBM group of cases group of cases on 05.10.2017. Both the assessee being part of JBM Group were also subjected to search. As such, notices u/s 153A dated 21.08.2019 of the Act were issued to the assessee’s, after which