BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

126 results for “depreciation”+ Section 36(1)(va)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai151Delhi126Ahmedabad112Raipur86Chennai84Jaipur61Chandigarh52Kolkata39Bangalore39Hyderabad34Surat30Pune28Indore21Amritsar16Cochin15Guwahati14Jodhpur8Lucknow7Visakhapatnam6Rajkot5Varanasi5Cuttack4Rajasthan3Karnataka3SC3Dehradun2Allahabad2Telangana2Nagpur1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Addition to Income76Disallowance72Section 143(3)54Depreciation45Section 143(1)44Section 36(1)(va)33Deduction32Section 80I25Section 14A24Section 92C

B4S SOLUTION P.LTD,GHAZIABAD vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, Appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2187/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi06 Feb 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

For Appellant: Shri Abhishek AgarwalFor Respondent: Shri Kanv Bali
Section 10(34)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 2(24)Section 3Section 36Section 36(1)(va)

36 (i) (va) of the Act being Employees Contribution to ESI/PF, which has been filed before the due date of filing the return u/s 139(1) of the Act. 4. The Ld. Counsel for the assessee filed a written submission along with the order dated 09/01/2023 of Coordinate Bench in ITA No. 2197/Del/2022 (2019-20) and other connected matters

Showing 1–20 of 126 · Page 1 of 7

21
Section 43B19
Section 143(2)18

SAVLEEN KAUR,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-54 (4), DELHI

In the result, all the three captioned appeals of the

ITA 2249/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jan 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kul Bharat

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep Jain, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Maninder Kaur, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)

depreciation). Each of these deductions, has its contours, depending upon the expressions used, and the conditions that are to be met. It is therefore necessary to bear in mind that specific enumeration of deductions, dependent upon fulfillment of particular conditions, would qualify as allowable deductions: failure by the assessee to comply with those conditions, would render the claim vulnerable

ACIT, CIRCLE-49(1) , DELHI vs. AERO CLUB , DELHI

In the result, all the three captioned appeals of the

ITA 2293/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jan 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kul Bharat

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep Jain, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Maninder Kaur, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)

depreciation). Each of these deductions, has its contours, depending upon the expressions used, and the conditions that are to be met. It is therefore necessary to bear in mind that specific enumeration of deductions, dependent upon fulfillment of particular conditions, would qualify as allowable deductions: failure by the assessee to comply with those conditions, would render the claim vulnerable

KRISHAN PAL,NEW DELHI vs. ITO,WARD-34(1), DELHI

In the result, all the three captioned appeals of the

ITA 2250/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jan 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kul Bharat

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep Jain, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Maninder Kaur, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)

depreciation). Each of these deductions, has its contours, depending upon the expressions used, and the conditions that are to be met. It is therefore necessary to bear in mind that specific enumeration of deductions, dependent upon fulfillment of particular conditions, would qualify as allowable deductions: failure by the assessee to comply with those conditions, would render the claim vulnerable

B4S SOLUTIONS P.LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-4(2), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the three captioned appeals of the

ITA 2197/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jan 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kul Bharat

For Appellant: Shri Sandeep Jain, CAFor Respondent: Ms. Maninder Kaur, Sr. DR
Section 143Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)

depreciation). Each of these deductions, has its contours, depending upon the expressions used, and the conditions that are to be met. It is therefore necessary to bear in mind that specific enumeration of deductions, dependent upon fulfillment of particular conditions, would qualify as allowable deductions: failure by the assessee to comply with those conditions, would render the claim vulnerable

VACO BINARY SEMANTIES LLP,HARYANA vs. CIRCLE 4(1), HARYANA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 327/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Jan 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S

For Appellant: Shri Saurav Sood, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Vardhan, Sr. DR
Section 139(1)Section 250Section 36

1)(va).” 4. Grievances raised vide grounds taken in Form No. 36 has to be decided against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in as much as the there is no dispute that the employees contributions towards Provident Fund is deposited beyond the prescribed due date and therefore the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court

ACIT, CIRCLE- 8(1), NEW DELHI vs. EARTHLINE APPARELS PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result the appeal of the Revenue in ITA No

ITA 6475/DEL/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Jul 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Anubhav Sharma

For Appellant: Shri R.K. Kapoor, CAFor Respondent: Shri Vivek Kumar Upadhyay, Sr. DR

depreciation). Each of these deductions, has its contours, depending upon the expressions used, and the conditions that are to be met. It is therefore necessary to bear in mind that specific enumeration of deductions, dependent upon fulfillment of particular conditions, would qualify as allowable deductions: failure by the assessee to comply with those conditions, would render the claim vulnerable

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. GENUS ELECTROTECH LIMITED,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and assessee are decided as under:

ITA 701/AHD/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Feb 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant & Shri K.N. Chary[Through Video Conferencing]

36(1) (va) r.w. sec 2(24) (x) of Rs. 2, 37,861/- on account of employee's contribution to provident fund on the ground of payment after due date. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (A) grossly erred in confirming the action of AO in disallowing depreciation of Rs. 13,37,020/- on foreign

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-4,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. GENUS ELECTROTECH LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and assessee are decided as under:

ITA 100/AHD/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Feb 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant & Shri K.N. Chary[Through Video Conferencing]

36(1) (va) r.w. sec 2(24) (x) of Rs. 2, 37,861/- on account of employee's contribution to provident fund on the ground of payment after due date. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (A) grossly erred in confirming the action of AO in disallowing depreciation of Rs. 13,37,020/- on foreign

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-4,, AHMEDABAD vs. GENUS ELECTROTECH LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and assessee are decided as under:

ITA 1898/AHD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Feb 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant & Shri K.N. Chary[Through Video Conferencing]

36(1) (va) r.w. sec 2(24) (x) of Rs. 2, 37,861/- on account of employee's contribution to provident fund on the ground of payment after due date. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (A) grossly erred in confirming the action of AO in disallowing depreciation of Rs. 13,37,020/- on foreign

THE ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD vs. GENUS ELETROTECH LIMITED, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and assessee are decided as under:

ITA 2617/AHD/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Feb 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant & Shri K.N. Chary[Through Video Conferencing]

36(1) (va) r.w. sec 2(24) (x) of Rs. 2, 37,861/- on account of employee's contribution to provident fund on the ground of payment after due date. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (A) grossly erred in confirming the action of AO in disallowing depreciation of Rs. 13,37,020/- on foreign

M/S. GENUS ELECTROTECH LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-4,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and assessee are decided as under:

ITA 2830/AHD/2013[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Feb 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant & Shri K.N. Chary[Through Video Conferencing]

36(1) (va) r.w. sec 2(24) (x) of Rs. 2, 37,861/- on account of employee's contribution to provident fund on the ground of payment after due date. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (A) grossly erred in confirming the action of AO in disallowing depreciation of Rs. 13,37,020/- on foreign

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-4,, AHMEDABAD vs. GENUS ELECTROTECH LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and assessee are decided as under:

ITA 1899/AHD/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Feb 2021AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant & Shri K.N. Chary[Through Video Conferencing]

36(1) (va) r.w. sec 2(24) (x) of Rs. 2, 37,861/- on account of employee's contribution to provident fund on the ground of payment after due date. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (A) grossly erred in confirming the action of AO in disallowing depreciation of Rs. 13,37,020/- on foreign

M/S. GENUS ELECTROTECH LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE- 2(1)(1),, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and assessee are decided as under:

ITA 2461/AHD/2015[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Feb 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant & Shri K.N. Chary[Through Video Conferencing]

36(1) (va) r.w. sec 2(24) (x) of Rs. 2, 37,861/- on account of employee's contribution to provident fund on the ground of payment after due date. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (A) grossly erred in confirming the action of AO in disallowing depreciation of Rs. 13,37,020/- on foreign

M/S. GENUS ELECTROTECH LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-4,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and assessee are decided as under:

ITA 1763/AHD/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Feb 2021AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant & Shri K.N. Chary[Through Video Conferencing]

36(1) (va) r.w. sec 2(24) (x) of Rs. 2, 37,861/- on account of employee's contribution to provident fund on the ground of payment after due date. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (A) grossly erred in confirming the action of AO in disallowing depreciation of Rs. 13,37,020/- on foreign

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-4,, AHMEDABAD vs. M/S. GENUS ELECTROTECH LTD.,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and assessee are decided as under:

ITA 99/AHD/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Feb 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant & Shri K.N. Chary[Through Video Conferencing]

36(1) (va) r.w. sec 2(24) (x) of Rs. 2, 37,861/- on account of employee's contribution to provident fund on the ground of payment after due date. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (A) grossly erred in confirming the action of AO in disallowing depreciation of Rs. 13,37,020/- on foreign

M/S. GENUS ELECTROTECH LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-4,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and assessee are decided as under:

ITA 348/AHD/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Feb 2021AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant & Shri K.N. Chary[Through Video Conferencing]

36(1) (va) r.w. sec 2(24) (x) of Rs. 2, 37,861/- on account of employee's contribution to provident fund on the ground of payment after due date. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (A) grossly erred in confirming the action of AO in disallowing depreciation of Rs. 13,37,020/- on foreign

M/S. GENUS ELECTROTECH LTD.,,AHMEDABAD vs. THE DY.CIT, CIRCLE-4,, AHMEDABAD

In the result, the appeals of the Revenue and assessee are decided as under:

ITA 2831/AHD/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Feb 2021AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant & Shri K.N. Chary[Through Video Conferencing]

36(1) (va) r.w. sec 2(24) (x) of Rs. 2, 37,861/- on account of employee's contribution to provident fund on the ground of payment after due date. 2. On the facts and circumstances of the case, Ld. CIT (A) grossly erred in confirming the action of AO in disallowing depreciation of Rs. 13,37,020/- on foreign

ACIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S OXIGEN SERVICES INDIA PVT. LTD.,, DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed partly for statistical purpose

ITA 5467/DEL/2016[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi30 Sept 2021AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant & Shri K.N. Chary[Through Video Conferencing] Assessment Year: 2007-08

Section 14ASection 2(24)(x)Section 36

36(1 )(va) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 in respect of due date. 10. The appellant craves to be allowed to add any fresh ground of appeal and/or delete or amend any of the ground of appeal. 2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that the assessee company (formerly known as ‘India Prepaid Services Private Limited’) is engaged

STEEL CITY BEVERAGES LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ITO,WARD-24(1), NEW DELHI

In the result the appeal of the assessee ispartly allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 3133/DEL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Sh.M. Balaganesh & Sh. Sudhir Kumarassessment Year: 2018-19 Steel City Beverages Vs Ito Limited, C/O Advocate Ward- 24 (1) Kanika Jain D-80, Lgf New Delhi Panchsheel New Delhi - 1110017 Pan No.Aaccs3967M (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 142Section 143Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 36Section 40Section 40ASection 47A(7)

Section 36 (1) (va). The brief facts of the case are that theassessee is a private 3. limited company incorporated under the companies Act 2013 and having its present registered office at Plot no F-4(A) M.I,C.D. Industrial area Hingna Nagpur. The assessee engaged in the business of manufacturing & sale of fruit juice under franchise of Pepsi