COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI I vs. CONTINENTAL PACKAGING P.LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the 2009:DHC:437-DB Mahindra Finance

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. C.J.INTERNATIONAL HOTELS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the 2009:DHC:431-DB Mahindra Finance

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. NOKIA INDIA LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the 2009:DHC:434-DB Mahindra Finance

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI I vs. ANANT RAJ INDUSTRIES P. LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the 2009:DHC:430-DB Mahindra Finance

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS I.P.LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the 2009:DHC:438-DB Mahindra Finance

CIT vs. NEGOLICE INDIA PVT LTD

The appeals are dismissed

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the 2009:DHC:442-DB Mahindra Finance

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. NEHRU PLACE HOTELS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the 2009:DHC:426-DB Mahindra Finance

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S JINDAL EXPORTS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the 2009:DHC:387-DB Mahindra Finance

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. BIOSEED RESEARCH (INDIA) PVT. LIMITED

The appeals are dismissed

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the 2009:DHC:390-DB Mahindra Finance

THE COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX vs. NIS SPARTA LTD

The appeals are dismissed

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the 2009:DHC:433-DB Mahindra Finance

CIT vs. OCL INDIA LTD

The appeals are dismissed

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the 2009:DHC:439-DB Mahindra Finance

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. BRIJBASI ART PRESS LIMITED

The appeals are dismissed

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the 2009:DHC:392-DB Mahindra Finance

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI II vs. LEROY SOMER & CONTROLS INDIA P.LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the 2009:DHC:423-DB Mahindra Finance

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-1 vs. ALLIED STRIPS LTD

The appeals are dismissed

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the 2009:DHC:388-DB Mahindra Finance

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX V vs. M/S NESTLE INDIA LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the revenue on the Bombay High Court decision

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI III vs. SAMTEL COLOR LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the revenue on the Bombay High Court decision

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. INDRAPRASTHA MEDICAL CORPORATION LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the revenue on the Bombay High Court decision

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S JINDAL EXPORTS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

245D(4) and (6), did not have the power to reduce or waive interest statutorily payable under sections 234A, 234B and 234C except to the extent of granting relief under the circulars issued by the Board under section 119 of the Act. 12. Reliance was also placed by the learned counsel for the revenue on the Bombay High Court decision