BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

555 results for “depreciation”+ Section 144C(13)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai630Delhi555Bangalore323Kolkata78Chennai71Hyderabad50Ahmedabad40Pune32Chandigarh13Jaipur9Indore8Cochin8Dehradun6Karnataka5Surat5Visakhapatnam3Panaji2Nagpur1Raipur1Rajkot1SC1Kerala1Telangana1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)78Addition to Income52Transfer Pricing47Section 144C41Section 92C40Section 153A39Disallowance26Section 14A25Section 10A20Section 143(2)

FRESENIUS KABI ONCOLOGY LTD,NEW DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-9(3), NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 605/DEL/2020[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 Jul 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Prakash Chand Yadav & Shri Manish Agarwalfresenius Kabi Oncology Ltd. Income Tax Officer, B-310, Som Dutt Chamber, Ward-9(3), Bhikaji Cama Place, Vs. New Delhi. New Delhi-110066. Pan-Aabcd7720L (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92C

13) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act, in short) by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, TPO-1(2)(2), New Delhi (referred to as ‘the AO’) vide order dated 20.12.2019 for the Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. The assessee has challenged the final order by raising the following grounds of appeal: “1. 1. That on facts

L.S CABLE INDIA PVT LTD ,REWARI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE13(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Showing 1–20 of 555 · Page 1 of 28

...
18
Deduction18
Comparables/TP18
ITA 2572/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: Disposed
ITAT Delhi
29 May 2025
AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Manish Agarwal[Assessment Year : 2018-19] L S Cable India Pvt.Ltd., Vs Dcit, Plot No.28-31, Sector-5, Cirlce-13(1), Phase-Ii, Hsiidc Gc Bawal, New Delhi Rewari, Haryana-23501. Pan-Aabcl3621Q Appellant Respondent Appellant By Shri Gaurav Garg, Ca Respondent By Shri S.K.Jhadav, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing 01.04.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 29.05.2025

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 92C

144C(13) of the Act on 24.08.2022 by making addition of Rs. 13,12,50,050/- as proposed by TPO in its order u/s 92CA(3) of the Act and the total income of the assessee was assessed at Rs. 6,79,40,935/-. 4. Aggrieved with the final assessment order, the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal

ADOBE SYSTEMS INDIA P.LTD,NOIDA vs. DCIT, NOIDA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 928/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi16 Jun 2022AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Nageshwar Rao, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 144CSection 43

section 144C( 13) of the Act and hence is liable to be quashed/annulled as time barred. Henceforth all the grounds below are without prejudice to Ground no.1 above: 2. Ground No.2- Addition made by the learned AO of the amount under the head "any other allowable deduction" in Column No 33 of Schedule BP of the Income Tax Return

M/S. GLOBERIAN INDIA PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 2265/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Oct 2017AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: S/Shri Rahul Khare & Rohan Khare, AdvocatesFor Respondent: Shri H.K. Choudhary, CIT DR
Section 144CSection 254

depreciation 1,14,36,265 (As per para 3 above) ii) Addition under transfer pricing 4,12,04,919 adjustment as discussed in para 4.3 above TOTAL TAXABLE INOCME 5,26,41,184 3. Aggrieved with the order passed by the AO, the assessee company come up before the Tribunal by way of filing the present appeal. 4. We have

KUNSHAN Q TECH MICROELECTRONICS (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,UTTAR PRADESH vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-30, DELHI

ITA 5356/DEL/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi20 Jan 2026AY 2021-22
Section 132Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 148Section 153

13) of the Act needs to be annulled or quashed on the basis of this ground alone.\n10. 10. That on the facts, law and in the circumstances of the case, the Ld. DRP has erred in law in not entirely deleting the proposed erroneous additions amounting to Rs. 4,68,86,17,357/- while framing order u/s 144C

MOBASE INDIA PVT. LTD. ,UTTAR PRADESH vs. ACIT , DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 243/DEL/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 Feb 2024AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumara.Y. : 2016-17 Mobase India Pvt. Ltd., Vs The Acit, 1C, Front Part Of Front Building, National E-Assessment Centre, Udyog Vihar, Ecotech-Ii, Greater New Delhi. Noida 201306, Up (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaecd 8832 G Assessee By : Sh. Rajesh Dua, Ca Revenue By : Sh. Rajesh Kumar, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing: 06.12.2023 Date Of Pronouncement: 27.02.2024

For Appellant: Sh. Rajesh Dua, CAFor Respondent: Sh. Rajesh Kumar, CIT(DR)
Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 144Section 144CSection 2Section 234BSection 271(1)(c)Section 36(1)(va)Section 43(6)Section 43B

13) read with sections 143(3A) & 143(3B) of the Income-tax Act dated 30/03/2021 without first proposing such adjustment in the draft order passed u/s 144 dated 25/11/2019 4.2 as his action of not proposing the adjustments in the draft order u/s 144C has prevented the Appellant from filing the objection before the Dispute Resolution Panel. 4.3 thus

A.T. KEARNEY LTD.- INDIA BRANCH OFFICE,GURGAON vs. ADIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed

ITA 4405/DEL/2011[2003-04]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 May 2021AY 2003-04

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Kuldip Singhआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.4405/Del/2011 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2003-04 बनाम A.T. Kearney Ltd., Adit India Branch Office, Vs. Circle 1(1) 14Th Floor, Tower D, International Taxation, Global Business Park, New Delhi. Gurgaon.

Section 115ASection 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(13)Section 234BSection 234DSection 244ASection 271(1)(c)Section 44D

13 of India – UK tax treaty and is taxable on presumptive basis under section 44D read with section 115A of Act, thereby not accepting the ‘net income’ returned by the appellant in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Act and India – UK tax treaty. 4. Based on the facts and circumstances of the case

GEODIS OVERSEAS PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 483/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 Mar 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N. K. Billaiya & Ms Suchitra Kamble

Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92C(3)

13,187/- on account of depreciation on goodwill and also as per the Transfer Pricing Adjustment at Rs.7,73,93,666/-. The assessee filed objections before the DRP and the DRP has given directions u/s 144C (5) of the Act vide order dated 18/10/2016. After following the directions issued by the DRP, the Transfer Pricing Officer has given an order

DCIT, CC-29, NEW DELHI vs. DHARAMPAL SATYAPAL LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 1976/DEL/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Sept 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri G. S. Pannu & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 1976/Del/2020 (A.Y 2013-14)

For Respondent: Shri Vivek Verma
Section 144C(4)Section 80Section 801BSection 80I

144C(4)/143(3) of the Act dated 31/1/2018. As against the assessment order dated 31/01/2018 the assessee has preferred an Appeal before the CIT(A). The Ld.CIT(A) vide order dated 24/09/2020 partly allowed the Appeal. 7. Aggrieved by the order dated 24/09/2020 the Department of Revenue has preferred the present Appeal. 8. At the time of hearing

DCIT, CC-29, NEW DELHI vs. DHARAMPAL SATYALPAL LTD., NEW DELHI

ITA 1977/DEL/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Sept 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri G. S. Pannu & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.I.T.A. No. 1977/Del/2020 (A.Y 2014-15)

For Respondent: Shri Vivek Verma
Section 132Section 142Section 144C(4)Section 153ASection 80Section 801BSection 80I

144C(4)/143(3) of the Act dated 31/01/2018. As against the assessment order dated 31/01/2018 the assessee has preferred an Appeal before the CIT(A). The Ld.CIT(A) vide order dated 24/09/2020 partly allowed on the Appeal. 5. Aggrieved by the order dated 24/09/2020 the Department of Revenue has preferred the present Appeal. 6. At the time of hearing

DCM SHRIRAM INDUSTRIS LTD,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-7(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in above terms

ITA 2166/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi18 Mar 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Challa Nagemdra Prasad & Shri S. Rifaur Rahman

Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 144C(10)Section 14ASection 80Section 92C

depreciation. Regard must also be had to the fact that Section 10B(1) is essentially concerned with the grant of exemptions to newly established hundred per cent export-oriented undertakings and the deduction of profits and gains derived by such an enterprise. Sub-section (8) thereof enables an assessee to opt out of the exemption provisions contained therein subject

COMPASS INDIA SUPPORT SERVICES PRIVATE LTD. ,GURGAON vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4(2), DELHI

ITA 1383/DEL/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Feb 2026AY 2018-19
Section 143(3)

144C(13) r.w.s. 144B of the Act on 30.04.2022 making an\nadjustment of Rs. 80,32,194/- on account of provision of IS & T Services.\n19. Aggrieved with the said order, the assessee is in appeal before us on the\nfollowing grounds of appeal:\n4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, & in law, the Ld. Assessing Officer

COMPASS INDIA SUPPORT SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,GURGAON vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4(2), DELHI

ITA 511/DEL/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi04 Feb 2026AY 2017-18
Section 143(3)

144C(13) r.w.s. 144B of the Act on 30.04.2022 making an\nadjustment of Rs. 80,32,194/- on account of provision of IS & T Services.\n19. Aggrieved with the said order, the assessee is in appeal before us on the\nfollowing grounds of appeal:\n4. On the facts and circumstances of the case, & in law, the Ld. Assessing Officer

COMPUTER MODELLING GROUP LIMITED,CANADA vs. ACIT INTERNATIONAL TAXATION CIRCLE 1(2)(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee for AY 2012-13,

ITA 2091/DEL/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 May 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Ms. Astha Chandra

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(13)Section 153Section 234ASection 234BSection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 44B

144C(13) of the Act, taxing the receipts amounting to Rs. 10,37,32,010/- under s. 44BB of the Act, is wrong and bad in law as the same cannot be taxed at all in terms of the beneficial provisions under India- Canada DTAA. 4. That the Ld. DRP has grossly erred on in law by blindly relying upon

COMPUTER MODELLING GROUP LIMITED,CANADA vs. DCIT CIRCLE INTERNATIONAL TAXATION 1(2)(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee for AY 2012-13,

ITA 2090/DEL/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 May 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Ms. Astha Chandra

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(13)Section 153Section 234ASection 234BSection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 44B

144C(13) of the Act, taxing the receipts amounting to Rs. 10,37,32,010/- under s. 44BB of the Act, is wrong and bad in law as the same cannot be taxed at all in terms of the beneficial provisions under India- Canada DTAA. 4. That the Ld. DRP has grossly erred on in law by blindly relying upon

COMPUTER MODELLING GROUP LIMITED,CANADA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2)(1), INT. TAXATION, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee for AY 2012-13,

ITA 2305/DEL/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 May 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri G.S. Pannu, Hon’Ble & Ms. Astha Chandra

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(13)Section 153Section 234ASection 234BSection 250Section 271(1)(c)Section 44B

144C(13) of the Act, taxing the receipts amounting to Rs. 10,37,32,010/- under s. 44BB of the Act, is wrong and bad in law as the same cannot be taxed at all in terms of the beneficial provisions under India- Canada DTAA. 4. That the Ld. DRP has grossly erred on in law by blindly relying upon

HEWITT ASSOCIATES (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. ACIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assesee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 5736/DEL/2011[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi31 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms. Astha Chandraasstt. Year : 2007-08

For Appellant: Shri Atul Jain &For Respondent: Shri Surender Pal, CIT-DR

144C of the Act, we request your goodself to allow us the benefit of working capital adjustment. Based on the above submission, we request your goodself to rectify the above- mentioned defects by passing a suitable order under section 154 of the Act and accordingly issue the revised assessment order. ------------------------------ Unquote 2. In addition to the above-mentioned prima facie

VEDANTA LTD (SUCCESSOR TO CAIRN INDIA LTD),GURGAON vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-26(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 6937/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi12 Feb 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble, Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Kuldip Singh

For Appellant: Shri Ajay Vohra, Senior AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Sandeep Mishra, Senior DR
Section 115JSection 143Section 144CSection 14ASection 14A(2)Section 32(1)Section 32(1)(iia)Section 928(1)

144C of the 2 Income-tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) qua the assessment year 2013-14 on the grounds inter alia that :- “1. That on the facts and circumstances of the case & in law, the Ld. Assessing Officer (AO) erred in assessing the total income and adjusted book profit of the Appellant at Rs.906

EXL SERVICE.COM (INDIA) PVT. LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT (LTU), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee as well as ofthe department are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 302/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Jan 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Kuldip Singh, Jm Ita No. 302/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Exl Service.Com (India) Pvt. Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income 414, 4Th Floor, Dlf Jasola, Tax, Large Tax Payer Unit, Tower-B, Plot No. 10 & 11, Dda New Delhi District Centre, Jasola, New Delhi-110044 (Appellant) (Respondent) Ita No. 615/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs Exl Service.Com (India) Pvt. Ltd., 414, 4Th Floor, Dlf Jasola, Tower- Tax, Circle-1 (Ltu), New Delhi-110017 B, Plot No. 10 & 11, Dda District Centre, Jasola, New Delhi-110044 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaace5174C Assessee By : Sh. Ajay Vohra, Adv. Sh. Abhishek Agarwal, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Piyush Jain, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 07.10.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 03.01.2017 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am:

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Piyush Jain, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 92D

Section 32(1)(ii) of the Act and hence depreciation on the same shall be eligible at the rate applicable to other intangible assets specified therein. The assessee has also placed reliance on various judicial precedents.” 68. The ld. DRP after considering the submissions of the assessee directed the AO to allow the depreciation on the goodwill by observing

DCIT (LTU), NEW DELHI vs. M/S. EXL SERVICE.COM (INDIA) PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal by the assessee as well as ofthe department are partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 615/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi03 Jan 2017AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. N. K. Saini, Am & Sh. Kuldip Singh, Jm Ita No. 302/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Exl Service.Com (India) Pvt. Ltd., Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income 414, 4Th Floor, Dlf Jasola, Tax, Large Tax Payer Unit, Tower-B, Plot No. 10 & 11, Dda New Delhi District Centre, Jasola, New Delhi-110044 (Appellant) (Respondent) Ita No. 615/Del/2015 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs Exl Service.Com (India) Pvt. Ltd., 414, 4Th Floor, Dlf Jasola, Tower- Tax, Circle-1 (Ltu), New Delhi-110017 B, Plot No. 10 & 11, Dda District Centre, Jasola, New Delhi-110044 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aaace5174C Assessee By : Sh. Ajay Vohra, Adv. Sh. Abhishek Agarwal, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. Piyush Jain, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing : 07.10.2017 Date Of Pronouncement : 03.01.2017 Order Per N. K. Saini, Am:

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. Piyush Jain, CIT DR
Section 143(3)Section 92D

Section 32(1)(ii) of the Act and hence depreciation on the same shall be eligible at the rate applicable to other intangible assets specified therein. The assessee has also placed reliance on various judicial precedents.” 68. The ld. DRP after considering the submissions of the assessee directed the AO to allow the depreciation on the goodwill by observing