COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI I vs. CONTINENTAL PACKAGING P.LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

C.I.T vs. INDIAN SUGAR EXIM CORPORATION LTD

The appeals are dismissed

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI II vs. LEROY SOMER & CONTROLS INDIA P.LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

CIT vs. OCL INDIA LTD

The appeals are dismissed

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI I vs. ANANT RAJ INDUSTRIES P. LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI I vs. ANANT RAJ INDUSTRIES P. LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. C.J.INTERNATIONAL HOTELS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. BRIJBASI ART PRESS LIMITED

The appeals are dismissed

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. NEHRU PLACE HOTELS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS I.P.LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-1 vs. ALLIED STRIPS LTD

The appeals are dismissed

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S JINDAL EXPORTS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

THE COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX vs. NIS SPARTA LTD

The appeals are dismissed

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

CIT vs. NEGOLICE INDIA PVT LTD

The appeals are dismissed

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI III vs. SAMTEL COLOR LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. NEHRU PLACE HOTELS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S JINDAL EXPORTS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX V vs. M/S NESTLE INDIA LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

115J ? ‖ The question was answered in the affirmative in favour of the revenue and against the assessee. Of course, the questions in the present appeals are entirely different. 14. With regard to the issue of rectification proceedings, it was submitted that the provisions are clear. There is no scope for debate. Moreover, the provisions being mandatory and automatic, there