BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 194Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai19Delhi6Ahmedabad3Kolkata3Jaipur3Hyderabad3Indore2Telangana1Cochin1Cuttack1Dehradun1Jodhpur1Pune1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 2(15)12Section 12A10Section 2639Section 80G7Section 117Section 194J5Exemption5Section 201(1)4TDS4Section 2

ITO, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. DLF LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3608/DEL/2015[2006-07 (F.Y.- 2005-06)]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi25 Jan 2019

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2006-07 Ito, Vs. M/S. Dlf Ltd., Ward-74(4), Aaykar Bhawan, Dlf Centre, 9Th Floor, Laxmi Nagar, New Delhi Sansad Marg, New Delhi Pan :Aaacd3494N (Appellant) (Respondent) Appellant By Shri Praveen Kumar, Sr.Dr Respondent By Shri Satyajeet Goel, Ca

Section 133ASection 194ASection 194ISection 194JSection 197Section 2Section 2(28)Section 201(1)Section 44A

charitable trust are exempted from tax and the deducting of tax by the assessee and again claiming refund by the trust would only be futile exercise of utilizing resources of the Income-tax Department without any ultimate collection of taxes. The certificate has exempted the amount of rent mentioned in the certificate from deduction of the tax at source

3
Deduction3
Charitable Trust2

NIIT FOUNDATION,NEW DELHI vs. CIT(E), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 4868/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 May 2020AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Prashant Maharishi & Shri K.N.Charyniit Foundation, Vs. Cit(E), Plot No. 8, Balaji Estate, New Delhi Sudarshan Munjal Marg, Kalkaji, New Delhi Pan: Aacan3951E (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh Thar , CAFor Respondent: Ms. Parmita M. Biswas, CIT DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 263Section 80G

charitable purpose which includes educational charity. If the income is only accumulated or set apart for such purpose, the exemption is limited to the extent of 25 per cent, of the income of the property held under such trust. The exemption under section 10(22), on the other hand, is without any such limitation. The language of section

M/S SOCIETY FOR PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH IN ASIA,,NEW DELHI vs. ITO (E), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 2657/DEL/2013[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi27 May 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Sh. I.C. Sudhir & Sh. O.P. Kantassessment Year: 2009-10 Society For Participatory Research In Vs. Income Tax Officer(E), Trust Ward-Iii, Asia, 42,Tughlakabad Instutional Area, New Delhi New Delhi Gir/Pan : Aaats1994H (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 11Section 11(5)Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G

charitable purpose defined in section 2(15) of the Act and therefore, benefit of section 11 and 12 of the Act was not allowed to the appellant in the instant year. 4.2 On appeal, the CIT(A) upheld the denial of exemption by holding as under: “3.1 To verify the claim of the appellant, I have gone through the Schedule

SHREE BALAJI SEWA TRUST,PRASHANT VIHAR vs. CIT EXEMPTION DELHI, CIT EXEMPTION DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 5791/DEL/2024[2023-24]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi22 Aug 2025AY 2023-24

Bench: Ms. Madhumita Roy & Shri Naveen Chandra

For Appellant: Shri Ved Mittal, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Manish Gupta, Sr. DR
Section 12ASection 80G

194J of the Act, the same would not disentitle the assessee to claim benefit under Sections 11 and 12 of the Act unless the case of assessee is specifically hit by the Proviso of Section 2(15) of the Act, which is not the case here. The Proviso to Section 2(15) of the Act would not get attracted merely

UMAK EDUCATION TRUST,DELHI vs. JCIT (E), RANGE- 2 , DELHI

ITA 690/DEL/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi02 Nov 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Anil Chatrurvedi & Shri Anubhav Sharmaumak Education Trust, Vs. Jcit(E), S-135, Greater Kailash Ii, Range-2, New Delhi Delhi (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan: Aaatu2598P

For Appellant: Ms. Kanika Jain, CAFor Respondent: Shri Abhishek Kumar, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 12ASection 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 194Section 194JSection 80G(5)(vi)

section 11 (4A), the profit and gain from the business carried out by the charitable institution will not be exempt unless the business is incidental to the attainment of the objectives of the trust or institution. 7. Ld. AO taking into consideration the judgment of the Hon’ble Hon'ble Delhi High Court in case of GSI India

CELIAC SOCIETY OF INDIA,NEW DELHI vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), NEW DELHI

ITA 6240/DEL/2019[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi15 Oct 2019AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri H.S.Sidhu & Shri Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Malav Goswami, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. Ashima Neb, Sr. DR
Section 11Section 12Section 12ASection 194Section 194JSection 2Section 2(15)Section 80G

194J of the act on payment to the assessee. It is claimed that assessee has received this money and applied for the charitable purposes u/s 2 (15) read with section 11 of The Income Tax Act. Merely because the donors of the assessee, sponsoring the event have deducted tax at source on sponsorship amount, it does not make the activities