BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 53Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi5Mumbai4Bangalore3Patna2Ahmedabad2Jaipur1Chennai1Cochin1

Key Topics

Section 153C14Section 250(6)8Addition to Income5Section 153A4Search & Seizure4Section 1323Section 143(2)3Section 10(38)2Section 132(1)2

MODTECH INDUSTRIES,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, NEW DELHI

In the result, since the assessment order is set aside on legal issue, therefore, there is no need to decide the additions on merits which are left with academic discussion only

ITA 8045/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Oct 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri J.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 153DSection 50B

capital gains has been worked out be deducting the net worth of the business undertaking (which includes huge value of Goodwill) from the sales consideration”. Thus, even the learned AO admitted the fact that the said documents so forming part of satisfaction note have been disclosed and return of income incorporating the effect of the same had been filed prior

Section 153D2
Capital Gains2
Bogus/Accommodation Entry2

DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, NEW DELHI vs. MODTECH INDUSTRIES, NEW DELHI

In the result, since the assessment order is set aside on legal issue, therefore, there is no need to decide the additions on merits which are left with academic discussion only

ITA 8783/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi13 Oct 2021AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Prashant Maharishi

For Appellant: Shri Salil Aggarwal, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Shri J.K. Mishra, CIT-DR
Section 132(1)Section 143(2)Section 153ASection 153CSection 153DSection 50B

capital gains has been worked out be deducting the net worth of the business undertaking (which includes huge value of Goodwill) from the sales consideration”. Thus, even the learned AO admitted the fact that the said documents so forming part of satisfaction note have been disclosed and return of income incorporating the effect of the same had been filed prior

BHUSHAN FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CC-3, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the Appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed as aforesaid

ITA 1242/DEL/2021[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: S/Sh. S.K. Tulsiyan, Adv., LakshayFor Respondent: Shri Sujit Kumar, CIT(DR)
Section 10(38)Section 132Section 153ASection 250(6)

Capital Gains on sheer presumptive basis when there is no evidence of any form whatsoever to support such an action. 3. That the order dated 09-08-2021 passed u/s 250(6) of the Income tax Act 1961 (hereinafter called the "Act”) by the Learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) 23, New Delhi is against law and facts

BHUSHAN FINANCE PRIVATE LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CC-3, NEW DELHI

In the result, both the Appeals filed by the Assessee are allowed as aforesaid

ITA 1243/DEL/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Ms. Madhumita Roy

For Appellant: S/Sh. S.K. Tulsiyan, Adv., LakshayFor Respondent: Shri Sujit Kumar, CIT(DR)
Section 10(38)Section 132Section 153ASection 250(6)

Capital Gains on sheer presumptive basis when there is no evidence of any form whatsoever to support such an action. 3. That the order dated 09-08-2021 passed u/s 250(6) of the Income tax Act 1961 (hereinafter called the "Act”) by the Learned Commissioner of Income-Tax (Appeals) 23, New Delhi is against law and facts

ANSHUL BANSAL,DELHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CENTRAL CIRCLE 3 , DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 465/DEL/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi26 Nov 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri S Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumarassessment Year: 2019-20 Ansul Bansal, Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income 5A/3A, Ansari Road, Daryaganj, Tax, Circle-3, New Delhi Delhi Pin: 1100 02 Pan :Auqpb8298M (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 127Section 132Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 153CSection 250Section 272A(1)(d)Section 274Section 53CSection 69A

53C of the Act, the assessee has filed the return of income on 14.12.2022 declaring the total income of Rs.16,44,280/-. Further, notices under Section 142(1) of the Act dated 07.10.2022 and 25.01.2023 were issued to the assessee seeking the requisite details. Also, a notice under Section 143(2) of the Act dated 02.01.2023 was issued