SAPIEN FUNDS LTD,MAURITIUS vs. CIT(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasada N D Shri M. Balaganesh

capital gains on derivative transactions were not taxed under the Income Tax Act rejecting the contention of the assessee that the assessee is entitled for the benefit of Article 11 of the Indo Mauritius DTAA as the assessee is tax resident of Mauritius. The ld. 4 I.T.A. No. 2890/Del/2022 Counsel submits that for the assessment year 2017-18 the order

BHARTI GUPTA RAMOLA

The appeal is allowed

capital gains. Revenue preferred an appeal and by the impugned order has succeeded before the tribunal. The findings of the Assessing Officer has been restored. 6. In order to appreciate the controversy and to answer the substantial question of law mentioned above, we are required to examine and interpret Section 2(29A

SAPEIN FUNDS LTD.,MAURITIUS vs. CIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) DELHI-3, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Sh. Saktijit Deydr. B. R. R. Kumar

29A) to section 2 of the Act providing its definition. The term liable to tax in relation to a person means that there is a liability of tax on that person under the law of any country and will include a case where subsequent to imposition of such tax liability, an exemption has been provided. This amendment will take effect

INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS ALL INDIA CONGRESS COMMITTEE,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-19, NEW DELHI

Capital gains\" or any income by way of voluntary contributions received\nby a political party from any person shall not be included in the total income\nof the previous year of such political party:\nProvided that-\n1. such political party keeps and maintains such books of account\nand other documents as would enable the Assessing Officer to\nproperly deduce

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CR BUILDING vs. PC JEWELLER LIMITED, DELHI

In the result appeals preferred by the revenue are dismissed and the\ncross objections preferred by the assessee are allowed\nOrder pronounced in open court on 06

29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,\nSection 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 215 and provisos (b) and\n(c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and ant\nother laws. Copy of the order is attached as Annexure-4.\"\n2.2 In view of the Hon'ble Apex Court order from 15-03-2020 to06

DCIT, CIRCLE - 19(1), DELHI vs. PC JEWELLER LIMITED, DELHI

In the result appeals preferred by the revenue are dismissed and the\ncross objections preferred by the assessee are allowed\nOrder pronounced in open court on 06

29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996,\nSection 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 215 and provisos (b) and\n(c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and ant\nother laws. Copy of the order is attached as Annexure-4.\"\n2.2 In view of the Hon'ble Apex Court order from 15-03-2020 to06

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 31, DELHI

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

29A of the Representation of the People P a g e | 4 8 appeals Public Political Party (AY: 2015-16 to2017-18, 2021-22 & 2022-23) Act, 1951, with its office at A-42, 4th Floor, RoopDarshan, Juhu Lane, Andheri (West), Mumbai, Maharashtra. On 07.09.2022, a search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, DELHI

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

29A of the Representation of the People P a g e | 4 8 appeals Public Political Party (AY: 2015-16 to2017-18, 2021-22 & 2022-23) Act, 1951, with its office at A-42, 4th Floor, RoopDarshan, Juhu Lane, Andheri (West), Mumbai, Maharashtra. On 07.09.2022, a search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, DELHI

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

29A of the Representation of the People P a g e | 4 8 appeals Public Political Party (AY: 2015-16 to2017-18, 2021-22 & 2022-23) Act, 1951, with its office at A-42, 4th Floor, RoopDarshan, Juhu Lane, Andheri (West), Mumbai, Maharashtra. On 07.09.2022, a search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, DELHI

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

29A of the Representation of the People P a g e | 4 8 appeals Public Political Party (AY: 2015-16 to2017-18, 2021-22 & 2022-23) Act, 1951, with its office at A-42, 4th Floor, RoopDarshan, Juhu Lane, Andheri (West), Mumbai, Maharashtra. On 07.09.2022, a search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-31, DELHI

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

29A of the Representation of the People P a g e | 4 8 appeals Public Political Party (AY: 2015-16 to2017-18, 2021-22 & 2022-23) Act, 1951, with its office at A-42, 4th Floor, RoopDarshan, Juhu Lane, Andheri (West), Mumbai, Maharashtra. On 07.09.2022, a search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-31, DELHI

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

29A of the Representation of the People P a g e | 4 8 appeals Public Political Party (AY: 2015-16 to2017-18, 2021-22 & 2022-23) Act, 1951, with its office at A-42, 4th Floor, RoopDarshan, Juhu Lane, Andheri (West), Mumbai, Maharashtra. On 07.09.2022, a search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 31, DELHI

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

29A of the Representation of the People P a g e | 4 8 appeals Public Political Party (AY: 2015-16 to2017-18, 2021-22 & 2022-23) Act, 1951, with its office at A-42, 4th Floor, RoopDarshan, Juhu Lane, Andheri (West), Mumbai, Maharashtra. On 07.09.2022, a search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income

PUBLIC POLITICAL PARTY,DELHI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 31, DELHI

Bench: Shri Anubhav Sharma & Shri Amitabh Shukla

29A of the Representation of the People P a g e | 4 8 appeals Public Political Party (AY: 2015-16 to2017-18, 2021-22 & 2022-23) Act, 1951, with its office at A-42, 4th Floor, RoopDarshan, Juhu Lane, Andheri (West), Mumbai, Maharashtra. On 07.09.2022, a search and seizure operation under Section 132 of the Income