BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

131 results for “TDS”+ Section 482clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi131Mumbai126Bangalore114Chandigarh51Kolkata29Jaipur27Chennai26Ahmedabad21Indore12Karnataka8Hyderabad8Dehradun8Lucknow7Pune6Varanasi4Jabalpur3Ranchi3Visakhapatnam2Rajkot1SC1Raipur1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)70Addition to Income52Disallowance52Section 14A46Deduction35Section 144C31Section 4023Section 143(2)20Section 801A(4)18Section 263

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX -XIII vs. RAJINDER KUMAR

ITA/65/2013HC Delhi01 Jul 2013
Section 194JSection 40

TDS. 8. On further appeal by the respondent-assessee, ITAT by their order dated 1st August, 2012 has deleted the said addition relying upon decision dated 23rd November, 2011 of the Calcutta High Court in ITA 2013:DHC:3039-DB ITA No. 65/2013 Page 4 of 20 No. 302/2011 GA No. 3200/2011, Commissioner of Income Tax versus Virgin Creations

ARTEMIS MEDICARE SERVICES LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-73(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 2876/DEL/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Sudhir Pareeka.Yr. : 2014-15 Artemis Medicare Services Limited, Vs. Acit, Circle 73(1) Artemis Hospital, New Delhi Sector-51, Gurugram, Haryana (Pan: Aafca0130M) (Appellant) (Respondent)

Section 194

Showing 1–20 of 131 · Page 1 of 7

18
Section 133(6)17
Double Taxation/DTAA12
Section 201
Section 201(1)

Section TDS liability on Interest Total which interest u/s. u/s. 201(1A) charge 201(1A) for 97 months 9,56,945/- 9,28,236 18,85,181 1 95,69,457 194J @10% 8. Accordingly, the assessee is hereby directed to pay the TDS demand of Rs 19,57,482

ACIT CIRCLE 13(1), NEW DELHI vs. LX PANTOS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 912/DEL/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 May 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri M.Balaganesh

Section 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 9(1)Section 9(1)(i)

482) * Pantos India's case was selected for scrutiny under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). During the course of said proceedings, Assessing Officer ('AO') held that Pantos India is availing advisory services from the overseas logistics company and the same is in the nature of consultancy services which would qualify as Fees for technical

ACIT CIRCLE 13(1), NEW DELHI vs. LX PANTOS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 911/DEL/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi17 May 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Kul Bharat & Shri M.Balaganesh

Section 143(3)Section 195Section 40Section 9(1)Section 9(1)(i)

482) * Pantos India's case was selected for scrutiny under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). During the course of said proceedings, Assessing Officer ('AO') held that Pantos India is availing advisory services from the overseas logistics company and the same is in the nature of consultancy services which would qualify as Fees for technical

HERO MOTOCORP LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee in ITA No

ITA 1545/DEL/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi24 Oct 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Sh. I. C. Sudhir & Shri Prashant Maharishihero Motocorp Limited, Jcit, 34, Basant Lok, Vasant Range-1, New Delhi Vs. Vihar, New Delhi Pan: Aaach0812J (Appellant) (Respondent) Dcit, M/S. Hero Moto Corp. Circle-11(1), Ltd., 34, Community Vs. New Delhi Centre, Basant Lok, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi-110057 (Appellant) (Respondent) Dcit, M/S. Hero Moto Corp. Circle-11(1), Ltd., 34, Community

For Appellant: Sh. Ajay Vohra, Sr. AdvFor Respondent: Sh. NC Sawain, CIT DR
Section 143Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 92C

Section 92C(1) of the Income-tax Act. In view of the above, the decision of Hon‘ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Nestle India Ltd. (supra) would support the case of the assessee rather than the Revenue. In view of the totality of above facts, we are unable to uphold the view of the TPO that

M/S. VOITH PAPER GMBH,NEW DELHI vs. DDIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1077/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Feb 2020AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri O.P. Kant & Shri K.N. Charyassessment Year: 2010-11

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 5(2)Section 9

Section 26: Risk prima facie passes with property:— ‘Unless otherwise agreed, the goods remain at the seller’s risk until the property therein is transferred to the buyer, but when the property therein is transferred to the buyer, the goods are at the buyer’s risk whether delivery has been made or not……..” 7.5 We find that though

M/S. NATIONAL PETROLEUM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,NEW DELHI vs. DDIT, NEW DELHI

In the result the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 2004/DEL/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi21 Jun 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N. K. Saini & Smt. Beena A. Pillai

For Appellant: Shri Amit Arora, CAFor Respondent: Shri Amrendra Kumar, CIT DR
Section 44BSection 9(1)

TDS of Rs.10,71,44,001/- while determining the tax liability of the appellant and hence the demand thus raised is wholly erroneous. 11. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law, the Ld. AO erred in mechanically proposing and the DRP has further erred in upholding/ confirming the action

SMS GROUP GMBH,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-3(1)(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 7569/DEL/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

482, the Supreme Court has held that where income from designing fabrication and procurement had arisen outside india it was not taxable. 6. The information provided on website is of general nature and is not in respect of the specific contracts which are subject matter of this case. The taxability of receipts ought to be determined according to the terms

SMS GROUP GMBH (FORMERLY SMS SIEMAG AG),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 3(1)(2), INTL TAXATION, NEW DELHI

ITA 6106/DEL/2012[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

482, the Supreme Court has held that where income from designing fabrication and procurement had arisen outside india it was not taxable. 6. The information provided on website is of general nature and is not in respect of the specific contracts which are subject matter of this case. The taxability of receipts ought to be determined according to the terms

SMS GROUP GMBH (FORMERLY SMS SIEMAG AG),NEW DELHI vs. AACIT, CIRCLE- 3(1)(2), INTL. TAXATION, NEW DELHI

ITA 1074/DEL/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

482, the Supreme Court has held that where income from designing fabrication and procurement had arisen outside india it was not taxable. 6. The information provided on website is of general nature and is not in respect of the specific contracts which are subject matter of this case. The taxability of receipts ought to be determined according to the terms

SMS GROUP GMBH,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1)(2) (INT. TAX.), NEW DELHI

ITA 4044/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

482, the Supreme Court has held that where income from designing fabrication and procurement had arisen outside india it was not taxable. 6. The information provided on website is of general nature and is not in respect of the specific contracts which are subject matter of this case. The taxability of receipts ought to be determined according to the terms

SMS GROUP GMBH (SMS SIEMAG AG),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 3(1)(2), INTL. TAXATION, NEW DELHI

ITA 6359/DEL/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

482, the Supreme Court has held that where income from designing fabrication and procurement had arisen outside india it was not taxable. 6. The information provided on website is of general nature and is not in respect of the specific contracts which are subject matter of this case. The taxability of receipts ought to be determined according to the terms

SMS GROUP GMBH (FORMERLY SMS SIEMAG AG),NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. DIT, NEW DELHI

ITA 5580/DEL/2011[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

482, the Supreme Court has held that where income from designing fabrication and procurement had arisen outside india it was not taxable. 6. The information provided on website is of general nature and is not in respect of the specific contracts which are subject matter of this case. The taxability of receipts ought to be determined according to the terms

SMS GROUP GMBH (SMS SIEMAG AG),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 3(1)(2), INTL. TAXATION, NEW DELHI

ITA 6161/DEL/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

482, the Supreme Court has held that where income from designing fabrication and procurement had arisen outside india it was not taxable. 6. The information provided on website is of general nature and is not in respect of the specific contracts which are subject matter of this case. The taxability of receipts ought to be determined according to the terms

SMS GROUP GMBH,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), NEW DELHI

ITA 256/DEL/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

482, the Supreme Court has held that where income from designing fabrication and procurement had arisen outside india it was not taxable. 6. The information provided on website is of general nature and is not in respect of the specific contracts which are subject matter of this case. The taxability of receipts ought to be determined according to the terms

SMS MEVAC UK LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-3(1)(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 9738/DEL/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

482, the Supreme Court has held that where income from designing fabrication and procurement had arisen outside india it was not taxable. 6. The information provided on website is of general nature and is not in respect of the specific contracts which are subject matter of this case. The taxability of receipts ought to be determined according to the terms

SMS GROUP GMBH,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-3(1)(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 7570/DEL/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

482, the Supreme Court has held that where income from designing fabrication and procurement had arisen outside india it was not taxable. 6. The information provided on website is of general nature and is not in respect of the specific contracts which are subject matter of this case. The taxability of receipts ought to be determined according to the terms

SMS MEVAC UK LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ACIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-3(1)(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 3070/DEL/2019[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

482, the Supreme Court has held that where income from designing fabrication and procurement had arisen outside india it was not taxable. 6. The information provided on website is of general nature and is not in respect of the specific contracts which are subject matter of this case. The taxability of receipts ought to be determined according to the terms

SMS GROUP GMBH (FORMERLY SMS SIEMAG AG),NEW DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 3(1)(2), INTL. TAXATION, NEW DELHI

ITA 2144/DEL/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara & Shri S. Rifaur Rahmanassessment Year: 2008-09 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2007-08 With Assessment Year: 2009-10 With Assessment Year: 2010-11 With Assessment Year: 2011-12 Vs. Addl. Dit/Ddit, M/S. Sms Siemag Ag (Formerly Sms Demag Ag) Circle-2(2), Intl. Taxation, C/O- Mohinder Puri & Co., New Delhi Ca, 1A-D, Vandhna, 11 Tolstoy Marg, New Delhi Pan: Aadcs1173J (Appellant) (Respondent) With Assessment Year: 2012-13 With Assessment Year: 2013-14 With Assessment Year: 2014-15

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(1)Section 263(1)

482, the Supreme Court has held that where income from designing fabrication and procurement had arisen outside india it was not taxable. 6. The information provided on website is of general nature and is not in respect of the specific contracts which are subject matter of this case. The taxability of receipts ought to be determined according to the terms

SMS GROUP GMBH,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), CIRCLE-3(1)(2), NEW DELHI

ITA 5521/DEL/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Delhi09 Apr 2025AY 2015-16
Section 144C

482, the\nSupreme Court has held that where income from designing fabrication\nand procurement had arisen outside india it was not taxable.\n6. The information provided on website is of general nature and is\nnot in respect of the specific contracts which are subject matter of\nthis case. The taxability of receipts ought to be determined according\nto the terms