ACE DATAMATICS PVT. LTD.,DELHI vs. ITO, WARD-73(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

277 under section 201(1 A) without giving adequate opportunity to the assessee to present its case is unjust, illegal, arbitrary, illusory and the order deserves to be quashed. 2. The action of learned CIT(A) in holding 10 percent TDS

M/S HCL TECHNOLOGIES LTD.,,NOIDA vs. ACIT (TDS), NOIDA

In the result appeal of assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Prashant Maharishihcl Technologies Ltd, Acit(Tds), Plot No. 3A, Tower 6, 14Th Floor, Vs. Noida Sector-126, Noida Pan: Aaach1645P (Appellant) (Respondent)

TDS Statement had not been filed. However, section 201(3) of the Act as amended by Finance Act No.2 of 2014, as mentioned in the memorandum of the Finance Bill No.2 of 2014 is stated to have effect from 1st October, 2014. Thus, wherever the Parliament / Legislature wanted to make provisions applicable retrospectively, it has been so provided

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S EXXON MOBIL LUBRICANTS P. LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Ms Suchitra Kambleassessment Year: 2004-05 Dcit, Vs. Exxon Mobil Lubricants P. Ltd., Circle-11(1), Ernst & Young Tower, New Delhi. B-26, Qutab Institutional Area, New Delhi. Pan Aabce0207H (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.D. Kapila, Advocate Shri R.R. Maurya, Advocate Revenue By : Shri H.K. Choudhary, Cit- Dr Order Per R.K. Panda, Am:

TDS under section 40(a)(i) of the Income-tax Act is deleted. Other Expenses " Other expenses of Rs. 1,660,545 include foreign exchange gains/ losses, testing expenses, travelling expenses and sales promotion expenses. " The testing expenses of Rs. 427,090, training expenses of Rs. 578,277

NOIDA SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE AUTHORITY,NOIDA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2, NOIDA

In the result, the assessing officer is directed to allow both the disallowances

Bench: Shripawan Singhand Shribrajesh Kumar Singhआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6540/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2010-11 (Physical Hearing) Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, बनाम Dcit, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Circle-2, Vs. Uttar Pradesh. Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, A-Block, Sector-24, Pan No.Aaaln0639A Noida, Uttar Pradesh. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6541/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, बनाम Dcit,Circle-2, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, Vs. Uttar Pradesh. A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aaaln0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6732/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 Acit, बनाम Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, Circle-2, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Vs. Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, Uttar Pradesh. A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aaaln0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By Shri Ram Avtar Sharma, Ca & Shri Bhupesh Agarwal, Ca Revenue By Ms. Monika Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 26.11.2025 उ"ोषणाक"तारीख/Pronouncement On 12.12.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per Pawan Singh:

TDS u/s 1941 on lease rent. 12. The Revenue in its cross appeal has raised following grounds of appeal 1. That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts by ignoring the fact that the provisions of Section 10(46) of the I.T. Act, 1961 are applicable to the case of the assessee

ACIT, CIRCLE-2, NOIDA vs. NOIDA SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE AUTHORITY, NOIDA

In the result, the assessing officer is directed to allow both the disallowances

Bench: Shripawan Singhand Shribrajesh Kumar Singhआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6540/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2010-11 (Physical Hearing) Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, बनाम Dcit, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Circle-2, Vs. Uttar Pradesh. Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, A-Block, Sector-24, Pan No.Aaaln0639A Noida, Uttar Pradesh. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6541/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, बनाम Dcit,Circle-2, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, Vs. Uttar Pradesh. A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aaaln0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6732/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 Acit, बनाम Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, Circle-2, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Vs. Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, Uttar Pradesh. A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aaaln0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By Shri Ram Avtar Sharma, Ca & Shri Bhupesh Agarwal, Ca Revenue By Ms. Monika Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 26.11.2025 उ"ोषणाक"तारीख/Pronouncement On 12.12.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per Pawan Singh:

TDS u/s 1941 on lease rent. 12. The Revenue in its cross appeal has raised following grounds of appeal 1. That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts by ignoring the fact that the provisions of Section 10(46) of the I.T. Act, 1961 are applicable to the case of the assessee

NOIDA SPECIAL ECONOMIC ZONE AUTHORITY,NOIDA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-2, NOIDA

In the result, the assessing officer is directed to allow both the disallowances

Bench: Shripawan Singhand Shribrajesh Kumar Singhआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6540/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2010-11 (Physical Hearing) Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, बनाम Dcit, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Circle-2, Vs. Uttar Pradesh. Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, A-Block, Sector-24, Pan No.Aaaln0639A Noida, Uttar Pradesh. अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6541/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, बनाम Dcit,Circle-2, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, Vs. Uttar Pradesh. A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aaaln0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent आ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6732/Del/2018 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year:2012-13 Acit, बनाम Noida Special Economic Zone Authority, Circle-2, Phase-Ii, Dadri Road, Noida, Vs. Aayakar Bhawan, 2D, Uttar Pradesh. A-Block, Sector-24, Noida, Uttar Pradesh. Pan No.Aaaln0639A अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Assessee By Shri Ram Avtar Sharma, Ca & Shri Bhupesh Agarwal, Ca Revenue By Ms. Monika Singh, Cit-Dr सुनवाईक"तारीख/ Date Of Hearing: 26.11.2025 उ"ोषणाक"तारीख/Pronouncement On 12.12.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per Pawan Singh:

TDS u/s 1941 on lease rent. 12. The Revenue in its cross appeal has raised following grounds of appeal 1. That the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in law and on facts by ignoring the fact that the provisions of Section 10(46) of the I.T. Act, 1961 are applicable to the case of the assessee

HERO MOTOCORP LIMITED,NEW DELHI vs. JCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result appeal of the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Sh. I. C. Sudhir & Shri Prashant Maharishihero Motocorp Limited, Jcit, 34, Basant Lok, Vasant Range-1, New Delhi Vs. Vihar, New Delhi Pan: Aaach0812J (Appellant) (Respondent) Dcit, M/S. Hero Moto Corp. Circle-11(1), Ltd., 34, Community Vs. New Delhi Centre, Basant Lok, Vasant Vihar, New Delhi-110057 (Appellant) (Respondent) Dcit, M/S. Hero Moto Corp. Circle-11(1), Ltd., 34, Community

Section 92C(1) of the Income-tax Act. In view of the above, the decision of Hon‘ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Nestle India Ltd. (supra) would support the case of the assessee rather than the Revenue. In view of the totality of above facts, we are unable to uphold the view of the TPO that

DLF LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

TDS Rs.712257/-; 18. Deletion of addition on account of reclassification of income from income from house property to income from business and profession.- Rs.9,40,52,455/-; 19. Deletion of addition on account of disallowance of notional rent/additional annual letting value in respect of the vacant property. - Rs. 12,28,340/-; 20. Deletion of addition on account of disallowance

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. DLF LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu

TDS Rs.712257/-; 18. Deletion of addition on account of reclassification of income from income from house property to income from business and profession.- Rs.9,40,52,455/-; 19. Deletion of addition on account of disallowance of notional rent/additional annual letting value in respect of the vacant property. - Rs. 12,28,340/-; 20. Deletion of addition on account of disallowance

DCIT (TDS), GURGAON vs. THE SONIPAT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD., SONEPAT

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed

Bench: Shri H.S. Sidhua.Y. : 2011-12

TDS return on NSDL site. Hence, the assessee PR is treated to be an assessee-in-default uls 201(1) & 201(IA) of the LT. Act 1961 for violating the provisions of section 194A read with section 206AA of the LT. Act 1961. Hence the assessee PR is treated to be an assessee-in-default under section

DEV BHUMI DOLD CHAIN PVT. LTD,DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE-7(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of assessee is partly allowed as above

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Avdhesh Kumar Mishra

TDS provisions under section 194C of the Act did not get attracted here. The Ld. AR placed reliance reads as under: - i. Bhagyanagar Gas Ltd. 140 I.T.D. page 591 (Hydt.) ii. Gujrat Narmada Valley Fertilisers Co. Ltd. 361 ITR 192 (Guj.) iii. Dhaanya Seeds Pvt. Ltd. in (2014) 42 Taxman.com 277

GRANITE SERVICES INTERNATIONAL INDIA PVT. LTD.,GURGAON vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Sh. R. K. Panda & Sh. Sudhanshu Srivastavaassessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Granite Services Dcit International India Private Vs Circle-10(2), Limited, Building No.7A, New Delhi 5Th Floor, Dlf Cyber City, Phase-Iii, Sector -25A, Gurgaon-122002 Pan Aaccg3374Q (Appellant) (Respondent)

277,017 Total RPT / Sales (%) 41.56 10.1 He accordingly submitted that in view of the functional dissimilarities and significant RPT, this company should be excluded from the list of comparables. 11. So far as Mitcon Consultancy and Engineering services Limited is concerned he submitted that the above company provides services to banking division, entrepreneurship and vocational training division, E- schools

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. PURI CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri B.P. Jain & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava[Assessment Year: 2006-07] M/S Puri Construction Ltd Vs. The Dy. C.I.T W-82/A, Greater Kailash - Ii Circle - 18 New Delhi New Delhi Pan : Aaacp2760 K

TDS on payment so made to M/s Manami Construction Pvt. Ltd. (at page 277 of PB – I). (iv) Copy of Affidavit of Sh. Pramod Sharma (director of M/s Manami Construction Pvt. Ltd.) dated 24.12.2006. (v) Copy of annual accounts of M/s Manami Construction Pvt. Ltd. (at pages 280 to 286 of PB – I). 13.4 That in rebuttal, it was further

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S PURI CONSTRUCTION LTD., NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri B.P. Jain & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava[Assessment Year: 2006-07] M/S Puri Construction Ltd Vs. The Dy. C.I.T W-82/A, Greater Kailash - Ii Circle - 18 New Delhi New Delhi Pan : Aaacp2760 K

TDS on payment so made to M/s Manami Construction Pvt. Ltd. (at page 277 of PB – I). (iv) Copy of Affidavit of Sh. Pramod Sharma (director of M/s Manami Construction Pvt. Ltd.) dated 24.12.2006. (v) Copy of annual accounts of M/s Manami Construction Pvt. Ltd. (at pages 280 to 286 of PB – I). 13.4 That in rebuttal, it was further

M/S PURI CONSTRUCTION LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT, NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri B.P. Jain & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava[Assessment Year: 2006-07] M/S Puri Construction Ltd Vs. The Dy. C.I.T W-82/A, Greater Kailash - Ii Circle - 18 New Delhi New Delhi Pan : Aaacp2760 K

TDS on payment so made to M/s Manami Construction Pvt. Ltd. (at page 277 of PB – I). (iv) Copy of Affidavit of Sh. Pramod Sharma (director of M/s Manami Construction Pvt. Ltd.) dated 24.12.2006. (v) Copy of annual accounts of M/s Manami Construction Pvt. Ltd. (at pages 280 to 286 of PB – I). 13.4 That in rebuttal, it was further

DCIT CIRCLE-10(1), C.R. BUILDING vs. INFO EDGE (INDIA) LTD., NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Sudhir Pareeksl. Ita/Co No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 2014-15 M/S. Info Edge (India) Acit Ltd. Circle – 10(1) Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Delhi Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 2. 2015-16 -Do- -Do- 3. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 4. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 5. 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 6. 2014-15 Dy. Cit, Circle – 10(1) M/S. Info Edge (India) New Delhi Ltd. Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 7. 2015-16 -Do- -Do 8. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 9. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 10. Ita No.2648/Del/2023 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 11. Ita No.2649/Del/2023 2021-22 -Do- -Do- Assessee By Shri S. K. Aggarwal, C.A. & Ms. Jyoti Yadav, C.A. Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 19.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.11.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Captioned Eleven Appeals Arise From The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) - Delhi In Respective Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Tabulated Hereunder:

section 14A of the Act. ITA Nos.2581, 2658, 2659, 2660, 2661/Del/2023 (Assessee Appeal- Info Edge (India) Ltd. ITA Nos. 2657, 2645, 2646, 2647, 2648 & 2649/Del/2023 (Department Appeal-Dy.CIT) . 14.1 In consonance with the view expressed in A.Y. 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2017-18 (supra), the AO shall determine the disallowance excluding the investment not yielding exempt income subject to upper limit

INFO EDGE (INDIA) LIMITED,DELHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 10(1), DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Sudhir Pareeksl. Ita/Co No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 2014-15 M/S. Info Edge (India) Acit Ltd. Circle – 10(1) Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Delhi Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 2. 2015-16 -Do- -Do- 3. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 4. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 5. 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 6. 2014-15 Dy. Cit, Circle – 10(1) M/S. Info Edge (India) New Delhi Ltd. Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 7. 2015-16 -Do- -Do 8. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 9. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 10. Ita No.2648/Del/2023 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 11. Ita No.2649/Del/2023 2021-22 -Do- -Do- Assessee By Shri S. K. Aggarwal, C.A. & Ms. Jyoti Yadav, C.A. Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 19.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.11.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Captioned Eleven Appeals Arise From The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) - Delhi In Respective Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Tabulated Hereunder:

section 14A of the Act. ITA Nos.2581, 2658, 2659, 2660, 2661/Del/2023 (Assessee Appeal- Info Edge (India) Ltd. ITA Nos. 2657, 2645, 2646, 2647, 2648 & 2649/Del/2023 (Department Appeal-Dy.CIT) . 14.1 In consonance with the view expressed in A.Y. 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2017-18 (supra), the AO shall determine the disallowance excluding the investment not yielding exempt income subject to upper limit

DCIT, CIRCLE 10(1), NEW DELHI, C. R. BUILDING vs. INFO EDGE (INDIA) LTD., NEHRU PLACE, NEW DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Sudhir Pareeksl. Ita/Co No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 2014-15 M/S. Info Edge (India) Acit Ltd. Circle – 10(1) Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Delhi Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 2. 2015-16 -Do- -Do- 3. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 4. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 5. 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 6. 2014-15 Dy. Cit, Circle – 10(1) M/S. Info Edge (India) New Delhi Ltd. Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 7. 2015-16 -Do- -Do 8. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 9. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 10. Ita No.2648/Del/2023 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 11. Ita No.2649/Del/2023 2021-22 -Do- -Do- Assessee By Shri S. K. Aggarwal, C.A. & Ms. Jyoti Yadav, C.A. Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 19.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.11.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Captioned Eleven Appeals Arise From The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) - Delhi In Respective Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Tabulated Hereunder:

section 14A of the Act. ITA Nos.2581, 2658, 2659, 2660, 2661/Del/2023 (Assessee Appeal- Info Edge (India) Ltd. ITA Nos. 2657, 2645, 2646, 2647, 2648 & 2649/Del/2023 (Department Appeal-Dy.CIT) . 14.1 In consonance with the view expressed in A.Y. 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2017-18 (supra), the AO shall determine the disallowance excluding the investment not yielding exempt income subject to upper limit

INFO EDGE (INDIA) LIMITED,DELHI vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 10(1), DELHI

In the result, all the appeals of the Revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Sudhir Pareeksl. Ita/Co No(S) Asst. Appeal(S) By No Year(S) Appellant Vs. Respondent Appellant Respondent 1. 2014-15 M/S. Info Edge (India) Acit Ltd. Circle – 10(1) Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Delhi Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 2. 2015-16 -Do- -Do- 3. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 4. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 5. 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 6. 2014-15 Dy. Cit, Circle – 10(1) M/S. Info Edge (India) New Delhi Ltd. Gf-12A, 94, Meghdoot Building, Nehru Place, New Delhi – 110019 7. 2015-16 -Do- -Do 8. 2017-18 -Do- -Do- 9. 2018-19 -Do- -Do- 10. Ita No.2648/Del/2023 2020-21 -Do- -Do- 11. Ita No.2649/Del/2023 2021-22 -Do- -Do- Assessee By Shri S. K. Aggarwal, C.A. & Ms. Jyoti Yadav, C.A. Revenue By Shri Dayainder Singh Sidhu, Cit(D.R.) Date Of Hearing: 19.11.2024 Date Of Pronouncement: 29.11.2024 Order Per Pradip Kumar Kedia, Am : The Captioned Eleven Appeals Arise From The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac) - Delhi In Respective Assessment Orders Passed By The Assessing Officer Tabulated Hereunder:

section 14A of the Act. ITA Nos.2581, 2658, 2659, 2660, 2661/Del/2023 (Assessee Appeal- Info Edge (India) Ltd. ITA Nos. 2657, 2645, 2646, 2647, 2648 & 2649/Del/2023 (Department Appeal-Dy.CIT) . 14.1 In consonance with the view expressed in A.Y. 2014-15, 2015-16 & 2017-18 (supra), the AO shall determine the disallowance excluding the investment not yielding exempt income subject to upper limit