COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-1 vs. ALLIED STRIPS LTD

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S JINDAL EXPORTS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. INDRAPRASTHA MEDICAL CORPORATION LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SURYA ROSHNI LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. NEHRU PLACE HOTELS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI vs. AJANTA OFFSET & PACKAGING LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX V vs. M/S NESTLE INDIA LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

CIT vs. OCL INDIA LTD

The appeals are dismissed

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. BRIJBASI ART PRESS LIMITED

The appeals are dismissed

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. BIOSEED RESEARCH (INDIA) PVT. LIMITED

The appeals are dismissed

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI II vs. LEROY SOMER & CONTROLS INDIA P.LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

THE COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX vs. NIS SPARTA LTD

The appeals are dismissed

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S JINDAL EXPORTS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

CIT vs. OCL INDIA LTD

The appeals are dismissed

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. NEHRU PLACE HOTELS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-1 vs. ALLIED STRIPS LTD

The appeals are dismissed

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS I.P.LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment