BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

385 results for “TDS”+ Section 234Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai516Delhi385Bangalore241Hyderabad77Kolkata71Ahmedabad65Pune51Chennai34Jaipur31Karnataka27Raipur23Agra17Chandigarh15Indore15Dehradun11Visakhapatnam9Jodhpur7Nagpur6Lucknow6Surat6Cochin5Rajkot5Allahabad4Cuttack3Ranchi3Jabalpur3Guwahati2Telangana2SC1Amritsar1Patna1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)66Addition to Income54TDS34Double Taxation/DTAA33Disallowance31Section 234B29Penalty27Section 234A21Section 80I19Transfer Pricing

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S JINDAL EXPORTS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/402/2005HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

CIT vs. NEGOLICE INDIA PVT LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/986/2007HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

Showing 1–20 of 385 · Page 1 of 20

...
19
Section 271(1)(c)18
Section 115J17

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. MITSUBISHI CORPORATION INDIA P

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/969/2007HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI III vs. SAMTEL COLOR LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/701/2008HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX V vs. M/S NESTLE INDIA LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/1474/2006HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

CIT vs. OCL INDIA LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/1063/2007HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI vs. AJANTA OFFSET & PACKAGING LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/476/2008HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-1 vs. ALLIED STRIPS LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/791/2007HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. NEHRU PLACE HOTELS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/546/2008HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. SURYA ROSHNI LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/802/2008HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. INDRAPRASTHA MEDICAL CORPORATION LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA/344/2008HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

Bench: CASES PERTAINING TO SPL.DIVISION BENCHES

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

THE COMMISSIONR OF INCOME TAX vs. NIS SPARTA LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA - 907 / 2007HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. CADENCE DESIGN SYSTEMS I.P.LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA - 992 / 2007HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DEL vs. M/S JINDAL EXPORTS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA - 402 / 2005HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. NEHRU PLACE HOTELS LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA - 546 / 2008HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. BIOSEED RESEARCH (INDIA) PVT. LIMITED

The appeals are dismissed

ITA - 719 / 2007HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

CIT vs. OCL INDIA LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA - 1063 / 2007HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI II vs. LEROY SOMER & CONTROLS INDIA P.LTD.

The appeals are dismissed

ITA - 407 / 2008HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. BRIJBASI ART PRESS LIMITED

The appeals are dismissed

ITA - 708 / 2007HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX DELHI-1 vs. ALLIED STRIPS LTD

The appeals are dismissed

ITA - 791 / 2007HC Delhi06 Feb 2009

TDS. 6. Similarly, it was contended, in respect of section 234C that it stipulated charging of interest for deferment of payment