KGL NETWORK (P) LTD.,DELHI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE- 14(2), NEW DELHI

Bench: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu

TDS. Section 40(a)(i) of the I.T. Act is not applicable because the assessee- company has never claimed the airfreight as expenses in the Profit & Loss Account. Such type of payments are also exempt in consonance with India’s DTAA. Section 194C

INTERNATIONAL GREEN SCAPES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE 74(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes with the above observations

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2015-16] International Green Scapes Dcit, Ltd. B-16, Circle-74(1), Room No. 411, South Extn., Part-1, Vs 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, New Delhi-110024. Distt. Centre, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-110092. Pan- Aaaci0600F Assessee Revenue Assessee By Shri Sandeep Jain, Ca Revenue By Shri B.S. Anand, Sr. Dr [Assessment Year: 2015-16] International Green Scapes Cit(Tds), Ltd., B-16, Delhi-1, Room No. 610, 6Th South Extn., Part-1, Vs Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, New Delhi-110024. Distt. Centre, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-110092.. Pan- Aaaci0600F Assessee Revenue Assessee By Shri Sandeep Jain, Ca Revenue By Shri Shravan Kumar, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 25.06.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 19.09.2025

TDS) held that the impugned order passed by the AO under Section 201(1)/(1A) of the Act, invoking the provisions of section 194I of the Act instead of section 194C

INTERNATIONAL GREEN SCAPES LTD.,NEW DELHI vs. DCIT CIRCLE 74(1), NEW DELHI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes with the above observations

Bench: Shri Vikas Awasthy & Shri Brajesh Kumar Singh[Assessment Year: 2015-16] International Green Scapes Dcit, Ltd. B-16, Circle-74(1), Room No. 411, South Extn., Part-1, Vs 4Th Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, New Delhi-110024. Distt. Centre, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-110092. Pan- Aaaci0600F Assessee Revenue Assessee By Shri Sandeep Jain, Ca Revenue By Shri B.S. Anand, Sr. Dr [Assessment Year: 2015-16] International Green Scapes Cit(Tds), Ltd., B-16, Delhi-1, Room No. 610, 6Th South Extn., Part-1, Vs Floor, Aayakar Bhawan, New Delhi-110024. Distt. Centre, Laxmi Nagar, Delhi-110092.. Pan- Aaaci0600F Assessee Revenue Assessee By Shri Sandeep Jain, Ca Revenue By Shri Shravan Kumar, Cit(Dr) Date Of Hearing 25.06.2025 Date Of Pronouncement 19.09.2025

TDS) held that the impugned order passed by the AO under Section 201(1)/(1A) of the Act, invoking the provisions of section 194I of the Act instead of section 194C

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SAHARA INDIA MASS COMMUNICATION LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumar

section 194C (TDS for "work") and section 194J (TDS of income from "professional services"—the latter expression defined expansively by section

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SAHARA INDIA MASS COMMUNICATION LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumar

section 194C (TDS for "work") and section 194J (TDS of income from "professional services"—the latter expression defined expansively by section

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S SAHARA INDIA MASS COMMUNICATION LTD., MUMBAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are partly allowed

Bench: Shri S. Rifaur Rahman & Shri Vimal Kumar

section 194C (TDS for "work") and section 194J (TDS of income from "professional services"—the latter expression defined expansively by section

M/S. VARUN BEVERAGES LTD.,UTTAR PRADESH vs. ITO (TDS), NOIDA

In the result, both the appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

TDS u/s 194C on payments made to the Transporters. (b) That the Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the appellant assessee has complied the provisions of sub section

M/S. VARUN BEVERAGES LTD.,UTTAR PRADESH vs. ITO (TDS), NOIDA

In the result, both the appeals are partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri Anadee Nath Misshra

TDS u/s 194C on payments made to the Transporters. (b) That the Ld. CIT(A) has failed to appreciate that the appellant assessee has complied the provisions of sub section

HINDUSTAN COCA COLA BEVERAGES vs. JT.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

The appeal is allowed in the above terms, but in the circumstances, with

Bench: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR,HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

TDS was deducted by the Appellant @20% under Section 194-I of the Act was on the erroneous premise that Section 194C

ADDL. CIT, SPECIAL RANGE- 7, NEW DELHI vs. QUIPPO OIL AND GAS INFRASTRUCTURE LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result, the ground no

Bench: Shri Pradip Kumar Kedia & Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S.

section 194C by the payer in its quarterly TDS statement. In compliance of the same, the assessee had filed the TDS

DCIT, NEW DELHI vs. M/S. C L EDUCATE LTD., NEW DELHI

In the result ground number of the appeal of revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri A.T.Varkey & Shri Prashant Maharishi

TDS provision has been invoked by the income tax authorities in the present case. 42. For the above reasons we hold that the conclusion arrived at by the Tribunal cannot be disturbed. The Tribunal was right in law in holding that the provisions of Section 194C

CHANDIGARH FREIGHT CARRIER,MEERUT vs. PR. CIT , GHAZIABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is accordingly allowed

Bench: Shri N.K. Billaiya & Shri Anubhav Sharma[Assessment Year: 2015-16] Chandigarh Freight Carrier Vs. Pr. Cit 329, Uttam Nagar, Gupta Colony Ghaziabad Meerut, Uttar Pradesh-250 002 Pan No. Aahfc 1874 H [Appellant] [Respondent]

TDS on furnishing of Permanent Account Number (PAN). Thus the intention was to reduce the compliance burden on the small transporters. However, the language of sub section (6) of section 194C

M/S SPEARSEARCH SOLUTIONS,NEW DELHI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, NEW DELHI

Appeal is allowed

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara\Nand\Nshri S. Rifaur Rahman\Nita No.3216/Del/2025\N Assessment Year: 2014-15\Nm/S. Spearsearch Solutions,\Nf-4 & 5, Street No. 3, Near\Nnathu Sweets, Laxmi Nagar,\Nvikas Marg,\Nnew Delhi\Npan: Abofs7069J\N(Appellant)\Nvs.\Nincome Tax Officer,\Nward-77(3),\Nnew Delhi\N(Respondent)\Nassessee By\Ndepartment By\Nsh. P.D. Mittal, Ca\Nsh. Om Prakash, Sr. Dr\Ndate Of Hearing\Ndate Of Pronouncement\N25.09.2025\N25.09.2025\Norder\Nper Satbeer Singh Godara, Jm\Nthis Assessee'S Appeal For Assessment Year 2014-15, Arises\Nagainst The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/Addl./Jcit(A)-\N1, Mumbai'S Din & Order No.\Nitba/Apl/S/250/2024-\N25/1074646000(1), Dated 18.03.2025 Involving Proceedings Under\Nsection 201 Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (Hereinafter Referred To As\N'The Act').\N2.\Nheard Both The Parties. Case File Perused.\Ncoming To The Assessee'S Sole Substantive Ground That Both\Nthe Learned Lower Authorities Herein Have Erred In Law & On Facts\Nin Treating It As The Assessee In Default In Section 201(1)\Nproceedings We Note At The Outset That The Lower Appellate\Ndiscussion To This Effect Reads As Under:\N“Submission- The Submission Of The Assessee Is Reproduced As Under:\Nsub: Response To Notice U/S 250 Vide Din: Itba/Nfac/F/Apl\N1/2022-23/1050402744(1) Dated 04.03.2023 In Case Of M/S\Nspearsearch Solutions (Pan: Abofs7069] & Tan: Dels389078), F4\N& 5. 1 Fluor.

TDS deduction under Section 194C was appropriate. Therefore, the assessee was not in default for not deducting TDS under Section

M/S. SAAN GLOBAL,NOIDA vs. ITO (TDS), NOIDA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 4487/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 4488/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 4489/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 4490/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 4491/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Ita No. 4492/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 M/S Saan Global, Vs Income Tax Officer(Tds), C-56/18, Institutional Area, Noida Sector-62, G.B. Nagar, Noida-201301 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aahfs7473A Assessee By : Sh. S. Krishnan, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 19.08.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 20.08.2019 Order Per Bench: The Appeals Are Time Barred By A Period Of 11 Days. It Was Submitted That The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A) Dated 31.05.2016 Has Been Received On 13.06.2016 & Appeals Have Been Filed On 23.08.2016. The Assessee Has Filed Rectification Application U/S 154 Before The Ito For Correction Of The Amount Of Tax Demanded. It Was Submitted That The Assessee Was Under Bonafide Belief That The Appeal To Tribunal Does Not Lie At The Stage & Hence The Delay. We Find That The Delay Is Due To Bonafide Reasons & The Assessee Has Not Derived Or Sought To Ita Nos. 4487 To 4492/Del/2016 2 Saan Global

TDS on these payments are not made once the transporter submits his PAN to the deductor. 6. The Assessing Officer held that sub section (6) of Section 194C

M/S. SAAN GLOBAL,NOIDA vs. ITO (TDS), NOIDA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 4487/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 4488/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 4489/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 4490/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 4491/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Ita No. 4492/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 M/S Saan Global, Vs Income Tax Officer(Tds), C-56/18, Institutional Area, Noida Sector-62, G.B. Nagar, Noida-201301 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aahfs7473A Assessee By : Sh. S. Krishnan, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 19.08.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 20.08.2019 Order Per Bench: The Appeals Are Time Barred By A Period Of 11 Days. It Was Submitted That The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A) Dated 31.05.2016 Has Been Received On 13.06.2016 & Appeals Have Been Filed On 23.08.2016. The Assessee Has Filed Rectification Application U/S 154 Before The Ito For Correction Of The Amount Of Tax Demanded. It Was Submitted That The Assessee Was Under Bonafide Belief That The Appeal To Tribunal Does Not Lie At The Stage & Hence The Delay. We Find That The Delay Is Due To Bonafide Reasons & The Assessee Has Not Derived Or Sought To Ita Nos. 4487 To 4492/Del/2016 2 Saan Global

TDS on these payments are not made once the transporter submits his PAN to the deductor. 6. The Assessing Officer held that sub section (6) of Section 194C

M/S. SAAN GLOBAL,NOIDA vs. ITO (TDS), NOIDA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 4487/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 4488/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 4489/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 4490/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 4491/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Ita No. 4492/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 M/S Saan Global, Vs Income Tax Officer(Tds), C-56/18, Institutional Area, Noida Sector-62, G.B. Nagar, Noida-201301 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aahfs7473A Assessee By : Sh. S. Krishnan, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 19.08.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 20.08.2019 Order Per Bench: The Appeals Are Time Barred By A Period Of 11 Days. It Was Submitted That The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A) Dated 31.05.2016 Has Been Received On 13.06.2016 & Appeals Have Been Filed On 23.08.2016. The Assessee Has Filed Rectification Application U/S 154 Before The Ito For Correction Of The Amount Of Tax Demanded. It Was Submitted That The Assessee Was Under Bonafide Belief That The Appeal To Tribunal Does Not Lie At The Stage & Hence The Delay. We Find That The Delay Is Due To Bonafide Reasons & The Assessee Has Not Derived Or Sought To Ita Nos. 4487 To 4492/Del/2016 2 Saan Global

TDS on these payments are not made once the transporter submits his PAN to the deductor. 6. The Assessing Officer held that sub section (6) of Section 194C

M/S. SAAN GLOBAL,NOIDA vs. ITO (TDS), NOIDA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 4487/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 4488/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 4489/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 4490/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 4491/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Ita No. 4492/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 M/S Saan Global, Vs Income Tax Officer(Tds), C-56/18, Institutional Area, Noida Sector-62, G.B. Nagar, Noida-201301 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aahfs7473A Assessee By : Sh. S. Krishnan, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 19.08.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 20.08.2019 Order Per Bench: The Appeals Are Time Barred By A Period Of 11 Days. It Was Submitted That The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A) Dated 31.05.2016 Has Been Received On 13.06.2016 & Appeals Have Been Filed On 23.08.2016. The Assessee Has Filed Rectification Application U/S 154 Before The Ito For Correction Of The Amount Of Tax Demanded. It Was Submitted That The Assessee Was Under Bonafide Belief That The Appeal To Tribunal Does Not Lie At The Stage & Hence The Delay. We Find That The Delay Is Due To Bonafide Reasons & The Assessee Has Not Derived Or Sought To Ita Nos. 4487 To 4492/Del/2016 2 Saan Global

TDS on these payments are not made once the transporter submits his PAN to the deductor. 6. The Assessing Officer held that sub section (6) of Section 194C

M/S. SAAN GLOBAL,NOIDA vs. ITO (TDS), NOIDA

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Sh. Amit Shukladr. B. R. R. Kumarita No. 4487/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2010-11 Ita No. 4488/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2011-12 Ita No. 4489/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2012-13 Ita No. 4490/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2013-14 Ita No. 4491/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2014-15 Ita No. 4492/Del/2016 : Asstt. Year : 2015-16 M/S Saan Global, Vs Income Tax Officer(Tds), C-56/18, Institutional Area, Noida Sector-62, G.B. Nagar, Noida-201301 (Appellant) (Respondent) Pan No. Aahfs7473A Assessee By : Sh. S. Krishnan, Adv. Revenue By : Sh. S. S. Rana, Cit Dr Date Of Hearing: 19.08.2019 Date Of Pronouncement: 20.08.2019 Order Per Bench: The Appeals Are Time Barred By A Period Of 11 Days. It Was Submitted That The Order Of The Ld. Cit(A) Dated 31.05.2016 Has Been Received On 13.06.2016 & Appeals Have Been Filed On 23.08.2016. The Assessee Has Filed Rectification Application U/S 154 Before The Ito For Correction Of The Amount Of Tax Demanded. It Was Submitted That The Assessee Was Under Bonafide Belief That The Appeal To Tribunal Does Not Lie At The Stage & Hence The Delay. We Find That The Delay Is Due To Bonafide Reasons & The Assessee Has Not Derived Or Sought To Ita Nos. 4487 To 4492/Del/2016 2 Saan Global

TDS on these payments are not made once the transporter submits his PAN to the deductor. 6. The Assessing Officer held that sub section (6) of Section 194C