BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “section 68”+ Section 254(2)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,190Delhi1,042Karnataka451Surat374Bangalore284Chennai194Ahmedabad185Jaipur180Kolkata156Chandigarh111Cochin101Pune100Hyderabad81Raipur72Indore69Calcutta51Rajkot39Lucknow32Nagpur22Jodhpur15Guwahati15SC15Agra12Jabalpur11Cuttack10Telangana10Amritsar10Visakhapatnam8Dehradun7Varanasi5Rajasthan5Allahabad4Panaji3Patna3ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI2Uttarakhand1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 6812Section 153D12Section 143(3)8Section 144C6Section 16Section 254(1)6Cash Deposit6Addition to Income6

DCIT, CIRCLE- I, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, DEHRADUN vs. EXPRESS DRILLING SYSTEMS LLC, DEHRADUN

In the result, cross objection filed by the assessee is partly

ITA 6114/DEL/2017[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Sept 2023AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Challa Nagendra Prasad & Shri M. Balaganeshआ.अ.सं/.I.T.A No.6114/Del/2017 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 बनाम Dcit, Express Drilling Circle-1, Vs. Systems Llc, International Taxation, C/O Nangia & Co., 1St Floor, Ida, 46, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. E.C. Road, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Pan No.Aabce6891R अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent & Cross Objection No. 13/Del/2018 (In I.T.A No.6114/Del/2017) िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Year: 2009-10 बनाम Express Drilling Systems Llc, Dcit, Vs. C/O Nangia & Co., Circle-1, 1St Floor, Ida, 46, International Taxation, E.C. Road, Dehradun, Dehradun, Uttarakhand. Uttarakhand. Pan No. Aabce6891R अपीलाथ" Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 234BSection 40

2) by the eligible assessee. (14A) The provisions of this section shall not apply to any assessment or reassessment order passed by the Assessing Officer with the prior approval of the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner as provided in sub-section (12) of section 144BA. (15) For the purposes of this section,— (a) "Dispute Resolution Panel" means

VEDVATI SINGH,DEHRADUN vs. ACIT, HALDWANI

ITA 29/DDN/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Mar 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Sh. K. K. Juneja, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. K. Chaterjee, CIT-DR
Section 1Section 143(3)Section 153DSection 254(1)Section 68

2. Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused. 3. This assessee’s raises a common additional ground in all these six appeals i.e. ITA Nos. 27 to 32/DDN/2023 which are as under: “That in facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing Officer has erred in law in making addition being cash deposits in the bank accounts

VEDVATI SINGH,DEHRADUN vs. ACIT,CC, HALDWANI, HALDWANI

ITA 30/DDN/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Sh. K. K. Juneja, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. K. Chaterjee, CIT-DR
Section 1Section 143(3)Section 153DSection 254(1)Section 68

2. Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused. 3. This assessee’s raises a common additional ground in all these six appeals i.e. ITA Nos. 27 to 32/DDN/2023 which are as under: “That in facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing Officer has erred in law in making addition being cash deposits in the bank accounts

VEDVATI SINGH ,DEHRADUN vs. ACIT, HALDWANI

ITA 27/DDN/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Mar 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Sh. K. K. Juneja, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. K. Chaterjee, CIT-DR
Section 1Section 143(3)Section 153DSection 254(1)Section 68

2. Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused. 3. This assessee’s raises a common additional ground in all these six appeals i.e. ITA Nos. 27 to 32/DDN/2023 which are as under: “That in facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing Officer has erred in law in making addition being cash deposits in the bank accounts

VEDVATI SINGH,DEHRADUN vs. ACIT, CC, HALDWANI, HALDWANI

ITA 28/DDN/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Mar 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Sh. K. K. Juneja, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. K. Chaterjee, CIT-DR
Section 1Section 143(3)Section 153DSection 254(1)Section 68

2. Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused. 3. This assessee’s raises a common additional ground in all these six appeals i.e. ITA Nos. 27 to 32/DDN/2023 which are as under: “That in facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing Officer has erred in law in making addition being cash deposits in the bank accounts

VEDVATI SINGH,DEHRADUN vs. ACIT, HALDWANI

ITA 32/DDN/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Sh. K. K. Juneja, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. K. Chaterjee, CIT-DR
Section 1Section 143(3)Section 153DSection 254(1)Section 68

2. Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused. 3. This assessee’s raises a common additional ground in all these six appeals i.e. ITA Nos. 27 to 32/DDN/2023 which are as under: “That in facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing Officer has erred in law in making addition being cash deposits in the bank accounts

VEDVATI SINGH,DEHRADUN vs. ACIT, DEHRADUN

ITA 31/DDN/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun28 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Sh. Satbeer Singh Godara & Sh. M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Sh. K. K. Juneja, AdvFor Respondent: Sh. S. K. Chaterjee, CIT-DR
Section 1Section 143(3)Section 153DSection 254(1)Section 68

2. Heard both the parties at length. Case files perused. 3. This assessee’s raises a common additional ground in all these six appeals i.e. ITA Nos. 27 to 32/DDN/2023 which are as under: “That in facts and circumstances of the case, the Assessing Officer has erred in law in making addition being cash deposits in the bank accounts