BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

11 results for “condonation of delay”+ Unexplained Investmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai496Kolkata324Mumbai317Delhi289Hyderabad214Ahmedabad210Jaipur160Bangalore127Pune107Surat77Indore71Chandigarh61Amritsar60Visakhapatnam48Raipur47Cochin44Rajkot43Nagpur42Calcutta39Panaji34Lucknow32Patna24Cuttack18Guwahati16Allahabad12Dehradun11Agra10Jodhpur8Jabalpur6Varanasi5Karnataka2Ranchi1Orissa1SC1

Key Topics

Section 153A10Section 1448Addition to Income8Section 1327Condonation of Delay7Section 142(1)6Section 1475Section 1485Section 69B

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, DEHRADUN vs. SWARNGANGA CONSTRUCTION P.LTD, BHILWARA

In the result, both the appeals of the revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 186/DDN/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Dec 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri V.P. Rao

For Appellant: Sh. N.S. Jangpangi, CIT/DRFor Respondent: Sh. Kapil Goel, Advocate
Section 144Section 153CSection 249(3)Section 250(4)Section 271(1)(c)

condonation of delay afresh by speaking order. 6. Ground No. 4 to 14 are relating to admission of additional evidence by the ld. CIT(A) and deletion of additions made by the Assessing Officer on account of unexplained investment

5
Penalty5
Search & Seizure5
Unexplained Investment4

PANDITWARI SADHAN SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED,DEHRADUN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, DEHRADUN

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 87/DDN/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun02 Apr 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Satbeer Singh Godara(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Sushil Kumar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A. S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 144Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)Section 69

unexplained investment made under Section 69 of the Act read with Section 115BBE of the Act. The assessee preferred an appeal before the Learned NFAC with a delay of 261 days. The Learned NFAC observed that assessee had not shown sufficient cause for the delay in filing of appeal and accordingly dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. Aggrieved, the assessee

PANDITWARI SADHAN SAHKARI SAMITI LIMITED,DEHRADUN vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER , DEHRADUN

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 88/DDN/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun02 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri Satbeer Singh Godara(Through Video Conferencing)

For Appellant: Shri Sushil Kumar, AdvFor Respondent: Shri A. S. Rana, Sr. DR
Section 115BSection 144Section 147Section 148Section 271(1)Section 69

unexplained investment made under Section 69 of the Act read with Section 115BBE of the Act. The assessee preferred an appeal before the Learned NFAC with a delay of 261 days. The Learned NFAC observed that assessee had not shown sufficient cause for the delay in filing of appeal and accordingly dismissed the appeal as not maintainable. Aggrieved, the assessee

SSGR HOSPITAL & RESEARCH CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED,HALDWANI vs. DC/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRLCE, HALDWANI

In the result, appeals of the Assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 41/DDN/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Sept 2025AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 69B

delay of 18 days in filing the Appeals are hereby condoned. 4. Brief facts of the case are that, a search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) was carried out at M/s SSGR Hospital and Research Centre Pvt. Ltd. "Group of cases", Haldwani and other premises

SSGR HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED,HALDWANI vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI, HALDWANI

In the result, appeals of the Assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 70/DDN/2025[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Sept 2025AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 69B

delay of 18 days in filing the Appeals are hereby condoned. 4. Brief facts of the case are that, a search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) was carried out at M/s SSGR Hospital and Research Centre Pvt. Ltd. "Group of cases", Haldwani and other premises

SSGR HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED,HALDWANI vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI, HALDWANI

In the result, appeals of the Assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 71/DDN/2025[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Sept 2025AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 69B

delay of 18 days in filing the Appeals are hereby condoned. 4. Brief facts of the case are that, a search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) was carried out at M/s SSGR Hospital and Research Centre Pvt. Ltd. "Group of cases", Haldwani and other premises

SSGR HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED ,HALDWANI vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,HALDWANI, HALDWANI

In the result, appeals of the Assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 73/DDN/2025[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Sept 2025AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 69B

delay of 18 days in filing the Appeals are hereby condoned. 4. Brief facts of the case are that, a search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) was carried out at M/s SSGR Hospital and Research Centre Pvt. Ltd. "Group of cases", Haldwani and other premises

SSGR HOSPITAL AND RESEARCH CENTRE PRIVATE LIMITED,HALDWANI vs. DCIT/ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, HALDWANI, HALDWANI

In the result, appeals of the Assessee in ITA Nos

ITA 72/DDN/2025[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun17 Sept 2025AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwal

Section 132Section 142(1)Section 153ASection 69B

delay of 18 days in filing the Appeals are hereby condoned. 4. Brief facts of the case are that, a search and seizure operation u/s 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ('Act' for short) was carried out at M/s SSGR Hospital and Research Centre Pvt. Ltd. "Group of cases", Haldwani and other premises

SHRI K.N. SHARMA,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, DEHRADUN

In the result, ITA No.6908/Del/2014 filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes; ITA No

ITA 1687/DEL/2015[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Oct 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Rajat Sharma, CA &For Respondent: Shri S.K. Chatterjee, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)

unexplained investment by the assessee in cash and Rs.8 lakhs on account of receipt by the assessee on 04.04.2008. 5. Aggrieved with such order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. CO No.231/Del/2015 6. The ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee was not staying at Dehradun and was staying at Delhi

SH. KAMAL NARAYAN SHARMA,DEHRADUN vs. ITO, DEHRADUN

In the result, ITA No.6908/Del/2014 filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes; ITA No

ITA 6908/DEL/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun14 Oct 2020AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri R.K. Panda & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastava

For Appellant: Shri Rajat Sharma, CA &For Respondent: Shri S.K. Chatterjee, Sr. DR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)

unexplained investment by the assessee in cash and Rs.8 lakhs on account of receipt by the assessee on 04.04.2008. 5. Aggrieved with such order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. CO No.231/Del/2015 6. The ld. counsel for the assessee submitted that the assessee was not staying at Dehradun and was staying at Delhi

SHRI VIBHU GROVER,KOTDWARA vs. PCIT, DEHRADUN

In the result appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 110/DDN/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Dehradun26 Sept 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Yogesh Kumar U.S. & Shri Manish Agarwalvibhu Grover, Pcit, M/S Grover Sales Corporation, Dehradun. Garage Road, Kotdwara, Vs. Pauri-246169 Pan:Agdpg5842R (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By Shri Anil Jain, Adv. Department By Shri S.K. Chaterjee, Cit-Dr

Section 142(1)Section 147Section 148Section 263

Unexplained investments (Unsecured loans) - Assessment year 2013-14 - Assessee-company had received unsecured loans from two different companies - Commissioner noting that said loans were shown as investment in assessee's name in balance sheet of respective companies exercised revisionary powers and passed an order without giving an opportunity to assessee of being heard, invoking Explanation 2 to section 263 - High