Search: condonation of delay | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 80Gclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai217 Pune212 Chennai207 Ahmedabad205 Jaipur145 Kolkata107 Delhi99 Bangalore69 Hyderabad60 Surat39 Lucknow26 Chandigarh26 Nagpur22 Amritsar16 Indore15 Rajkot14 Visakhapatnam8 Agra7 Jabalpur6 Jodhpur6 Panaji5 Raipur4 Cuttack4 Allahabad3 Cochin3 Ranchi3 Calcutta3 SC2 Guwahati2 Varanasi1 R.M. LODHA ANIL R. DAVE1 Patna1

Key Topics

Section 80G16 Section 12A9 Exemption4 Condonation of Delay3

SUSI CHARITABLE TRUST,KHURDA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 582/CTK/2025[2026-27]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack04 Dec 2025AY 2026-27

Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ashim Kumar Chakraborty, CIT-DR

Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

condonation of delay. It was the submission that provision of Section 80G of the Act does not exclude the power

RURAL EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES FOR DEVELOPMENT,BERHAMPUR vs. COMMISSIONER-OF-INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 107/CTK/2025[2025-26]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 Apr 2025AY 2025-26

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy(Kz) & Shri Rakesh Mishra

Section 80G

Section 80G. 5. That the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) has overlooked the documents submitted by the Appellant Viz. Cash book, Vouchers, Bank statement, Audited Balance Sheet, Activities Report, Registration certificate and Affidavit etc. 6. That the appeal be allowed on the above ground (s) or such other grounds if any will be urged at the time of hearing

PROJECT SWARAJYA,CUTTACK vs. COMMISSIONER-OF-INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 411/CTK/2025[2024-25]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack14 Aug 2025AY 2024-25

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Rajesh Kumarआयकर अपील सं/Ita No.411/Ctk/2025 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2024-2025) Project Swarajya, Vs Cit(Exemption), Hyderabad Ganesh Ghat, Chandini Chowk, Bhakhrabad, Cuttack-753002 Pan No. : Aaatp 3816 F (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri Ananta Narayan Singhbabu, Adv. राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri Ashim Kumar Chakraborty, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 14/08/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 14/08/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This Is An Appeal Filed By The Assessee Against The Order, Dated 25.06.2025 Passed By The Ld. Cit(Exemption), Hyderabad For The Assessment Year 2024-2025, Thereby Rejecting The Assessee’S Claim For Registration U/S.80G Of The Act. 2. It Was Submitted By The Ld. Ar That The Assessee Had Applied In Form 10Ab Seeking Registration U/S.80G Of The Act. It Was The Submission That The Ld.Cit(E) Has Rejected The Application For Registration On Account Of Delay In Filing Form 10Ab. It Was The Submission That No Opportunity Was Granted To The Assessee To Explain The Delay. It Was The Prayer That The Issues May Be Restored To The File Of Ld. Cit(E) So That The Assessee Could Explain The Delay.

For Appellant: Shri Ananta Narayan Singhbabu, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Ashim Kumar Chakraborty, CIT-DR

section code 80G(5)(i) instead of 80G(5)(iv) of the Act for which the ld. CIT(E) has rejected the application of the assessee treating the same as non-maintainable. Admittedly, the assessee has filed the application belatedly. When the power for granting the registration is available with an authority, the power to condone the delay

PEOPLES FORUM,BHUBANESWAR,ODISHA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), CIT(EXEMPTION)HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed and the stay petition stands dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 358/CTK/2023[Not Applicable]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Apr 2024

Bench: Before Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwals.P. No.12/Ctk/2023 People People Forums Forums, Hig-97, Vs. Cit (Exemptions), Cit (Exemptions), Dharma Vihar, Khandagiri, Dharma Vihar, Khandagiri, Hyderabad Hyderabad Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan/Gir No Pan/Gir No.Aaatpo 2214 R (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.K.Agrawala, Ca/S.K.Hota, Adv /S.K.Hota, Adv Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Ld : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Ld Cit Dr

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agrawala, CA/S.K.Hota, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, ld

Section 12ASection 80G

delay in filing of the appeal is condoned and the appeal disposed off on merits. 8. At the outset, it was submitted by ld AR that the order passed u/s.12AB(4) on 20.6.2023 did not contain the Document Identification Number (DIN No.) and consequently in view of the circular issued by CBDT in Circular No.19/2019 dated 14.8.2019, the order