Search: condonation of delay

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 246clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 80I13 Section 26312 Section 14A6 Section 80G4 Deduction4 Disallowance4 Section 143(3)3 Exemption3 Condonation of Delay

SUSI CHARITABLE TRUST,KHURDA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 582/CTK/2025[2026-27]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack04 Dec 2025AY 2026-27

Bench: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN (Judicial Member)

For Appellant: Shri P.K.Mishra, ARFor Respondent: Shri Ashim Kumar Chakraborty, CIT-DR

Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)

condone the delay and to consider the assessee’s prayer for registration u/s.80G of the Act. 3. In reply, ld. CIT-DR submitted that he had no objection if the issue is restored to the file of ld. CIT(E) to consider the reasons for the delay and to consider the prayer of the assessee. 4. We have considered

SUSI CHARITABLE TRUST,KHURDA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

PUJA AGARWAL,ROURKELA vs. ITO WARD 1, ROURKELA

SUSI CHARITABLE TRUST,KHURDA vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD

PUJA AGARWAL,ROURKELA vs. ITO WARD 1, ROURKELA

MUKESH AGARWAL,ROURKELA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICE, WARD 1, ROURKELA

M/S- SBEP-GRIL(JOINT VENTURE),JHARSUGUDA vs. PRINCIPAL CIT, SAMBALPUR

M/S- RAWAT BALAJI (JOINT VENTURE),JHARSUGUDA vs. PRILNCIPAL, CIT, SAMBALPUR

SHREE BALAJI ENGICONS PVT. LTD,JHARSUGUDA vs. PRINCIPAL CIT, SAMBALPUR

DCIT,CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/SD. SRB CONSULTANCY (P) LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR