Search: condonation of delay

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 127clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(2)10 Section 2638 Addition to Income7 Section 153C5 Section 12A5 Section 153A4 Limitation/Time-bar4 Section 693 Section 40

BAITARANI GRAMYA BANK,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BALASORE

In the result, appeal is partly allowed

ITA 318/CTK/2013[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack24 Aug 2017AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri N.S Saini & Pavan Kumar Gadale

For Appellant: Shri B.K.Mohapatra, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Pradhan, DR

Section 36(1)(vii)Section 36(1)(viia)

condone the delay of 127 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and admit the appeal for hearing. 3. Ground No.1 is general in nature and hence, requires no separate adjudication by us. 4. Ground No.4 of the appeal is not pressed by ld A.R. of the assessee, hence, same is dismissed as not pressed. 5. In Ground No.2

M/S. BARIPADA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,BARIPADA vs. ACIT, BALASORE CIRCLE, BALASORE., BALASORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

BAITARANI GRAMYA BANK,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BALASORE

M/S. BARIPADA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,BARIPADA vs. ACIT, BALASORE CIRCLE, BALASORE., BALASORE

BAITARANI GRAMYA BANK,BHUBANESWAR vs. ACIT, BALASORE

M/S. BARIPADA URBAN COOPERATIVE BANK LTD.,BARIPADA vs. ACIT, BALASORE CIRCLE, BALASORE., BALASORE

TRISHNA REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD.,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BHUBANESWAR

SMT. MAMTA SHARMA,BARGARH vs. PRINCIPAL CIT (CENTRAL) , VISAKHAPATNAM

DCIT,CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(1), BHUBANESWAR vs. M/SD. SRB CONSULTANCY (P) LIMITED, BHUBANESWAR

M/S. ORISSA CRICKET ASSOCIATION,CUTTACK vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), CUTTACK

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), CUTTACK vs. SRI DIPENDRA BAHADUR SINGH, KEONJHAR

M/S. BAJRANGBALI STEEL INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD,ROURKLA vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE, SAMBALPUR