TRISHNA REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD.,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, BHUBANESWAR

PDF · subscribers
ITA 156/CTK/2017Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack31 May 2017AY 2007-084 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals. It held that granting the assessee another opportunity to present its case before the CIT(A) would serve substantial justice.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeals were filed beyond the limitation period. The Assessing Officer made additions to the income based on a best judgment assessment due to the assessee's failure to provide required documents. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal ex-parte.

What were the issues?

Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without providing adequate opportunity to the assessee. Whether the delay in filing the appeals should be condoned.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 153C,Section 144,Section 143(2)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK

Before: S/SHRI N.S SAINI & PAVAN KUMAR GADALE

For Appellant: Shri P.R.Mohanty, AR
For Respondent: Shri B.N.Das, DR
Hearing: 30/05Pronounced: 31/05

Heard together (4 matters)

ITA No.156/CTK/2017
ITA No.157/CTK/2017
ITA No.158/CTK/2017
ITA No.159/CTK/2017

Read from the judgment's own cause title. This page is filed under one of them.

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK

BEFORE S/SHRI N.S SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER

ITA No.156/CTK/2017 : Assessment Year :2007-08 ITA No.157/CTK/2017 : Assessment Year :2008-09 ITA No.158/CTK/2017 : Assessment Year :2009-10 ITA No.159/CTK/2017 : Assessment Year :2010-11

Trishna Real Estate Pvt Ltd., Vs. DCIT, Central Circle-1, N-3/336, IRC Village, Bhubaneswar, Bhubaneswar. PAN/GIR No. AABCT 7854 M (Appellant) .. ( Respondent)

Assessee by : Shri P.R.Mohanty, AR Revenue by : Shri B.N.Das, DR

Date of Hearing : 30/05/ 2017 Date of Pronouncement : 31/05/ 2017

O R D E R Per Pavan Kumar Gadale, JM

These are appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders

of CIT(A)-3, Bhubaneswar, all dated 3.10.2016, for the assessment years

2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 & 2010-2011 .

2.

All these appeals filed by the assessee are barred by limitation by

138 days. The assessee has filed condonation petitions dated 30th May,

2017 for condoning the delay in filing the appeals. After going through

the condonation petitions, we find that the assessee had reasonable cause

2 ITA No. 156/CT K/ 2017 : Assessmen t Ye ar :2007- 08 ITA No. 157/CT K/ 2017 : Assessmen t Ye ar :2008- 09 ITA No. 158/CT K/ 2017 : Assessmen t Ye ar :2009- 10 ITA No. 159/CT K/ 2017 : Assessmen t Ye ar :2010- 11

for not filing the appeals within the stipulated time. Ld D.R. did not have

any serious objection for condoning the delay. We, therefore, condone the

delay of 138 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal and admit the

appeals for hearing.

3.

Since the facts and issue are common in all these appeals, for the

sake of convenience, we take up the appeal for the assessment year 2007-

08 in ITA n.156/ctk/2017 for our adjudication and the decision will apply

mutatis-mutandis to other assessment years.

4.

Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is engaged in the

business of Real Estate activities since 1998. There was search and seizure

operation in the case of Artha Tatwa Group on 11.4.2012 and certain

incriminating documents were seized. The Assessing Officer issued notice

u/s.153C of the Act dated 18.7.2014 to file the Return of income. However,

the assessee filed return of income on 13.3.2015 in compliance to notice

u/s.153C of the Act and further a notice u/s.143(2) was issued to the

assessee to produce documents and evidences in support of return of

income filed the assessee has produced books of account, Bills and

vouchers. The Assessing Officer found that inspite of providing sufficient

time and opportunities, the assessee could not submit the documents

required for assessment. Therefore, the Assessing Officer was not in a

position to verify the Bbooks of account and to Best judgment assessment

u/s.144 of the Act. Accordingly, made the addition of interest payment of

3 ITA No. 156/CT K/ 2017 : Assessmen t Ye ar :2007- 08 ITA No. 157/CT K/ 2017 : Assessmen t Ye ar :2008- 09 ITA No. 158/CT K/ 2017 : Assessmen t Ye ar :2009- 10 ITA No. 159/CT K/ 2017 : Assessmen t Ye ar :2010- 11

Rs.11,18,127 to the returned income and passed order under section

153C/144 of the Act.

5.

Aggrieved by the order of the Assessing Officer, the assessee has

filed appeals with the CIT(A). The CIT(A) has dismissed the assesse’s

appeal exparte. Against the order of the CIT(A), the assessee has filed

appeal with the Tribunal.

6.

Before us, ld A.R. of the assessee argued that the CIT(A) has not

provided adequate opportunities before passing the orders. The assessee

could not file the details and explanation in respect of additions due to

various reasons and delays. Therefore, ld A.R. of the assessee prayed that

one more opportunity be provided to the assessee to present its case before

the CIT(A). Ld D.R. opposed to the prayer of the ld A.R. of the assessee.

7.

We heard the rival submissions and perused the orders of lower

authorities and materials available on record. Prima facie, on perusal of

the order of the CIT(A), we find that the CIT(A) has passed exparte order

confirming the addition. We are of the opinion that no harm will be cause

to the revenue if one more opportunity is granted to the assessee to

substantiate its case before the CIT(A) and the Ld A.R. of the assessee

undertakes to appear before the CIT(A) alongwith all required details and

documents. We, in the interest of substantial justice, set aside the order

of the CIT(A) and restore the entire issue to the file of the CIT(A) to pass a

speaking order after affording reasonable and proper opportunities of

4 ITA No. 156/CT K/ 2017 : Assessmen t Ye ar :2007- 08 ITA No. 157/CT K/ 2017 : Assessmen t Ye ar :2008- 09 ITA No. 158/CT K/ 2017 : Assessmen t Ye ar :2009- 10 ITA No. 159/CT K/ 2017 : Assessmen t Ye ar :2010- 11

hearing to the assessee. The assessee is also directed to appear and

cooperate in submitting the information and disposal of the appeal.

Accordingly, we restore the appeal to the file of the CIT(A) for fresh

adjudication as per provisions of law. Similarly, appeal filed by the assessee

for the assessment years 2009-10, 2010-2011 are also restored to the file

of the CIT(A) for fresh adjudication as per the provisions of law.

9.

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for

statistical purposes.

Order pronounced on 31 /05/2017 Sd/- sd/- (N.S Saini) (Pavan Kumar Gadale) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIALMEMBER Cuttack; Dated 31 /05/2017 B.K.Parida, SPS Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : Trishna Real Estate Pvt Ltd., N-3/336, IRC Village, Bhubaneswar. 2. The Respondent. DCIT, Central Circle-1, Bhubaneswar,- 3. The CIT(A) 3, Bhubaneswar 4. Pr.CIT-3, Bhuabneswar 5. DR, ITAT, Cuttack 6. Guard file. //True Copy// BY ORDER,

SR.PRIVATE SECRETARY ITAT, Cuttack

More judgments on Section 153C

All 9,619 judgments and leading authorities on Section 153C →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →