BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 80G(5)(vi)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai218Pune193Delhi181Kolkata126Jaipur113Ahmedabad98Bangalore85Chennai80Surat39Lucknow33Indore31Rajkot29Hyderabad27Chandigarh26Nagpur23Amritsar13Agra12Raipur11Cochin8Visakhapatnam7Karnataka7Jodhpur6Cuttack6Allahabad5Panaji5Jabalpur4Patna3Punjab & Haryana2Dehradun2Telangana2Varanasi2Rajasthan1SC1Calcutta1

Key Topics

Section 12A22Section 80G15Section 80G(5)(vi)14Exemption6Section 2(15)4

TRIDENT ACADEMY OF CREATIVE TECHNOLOGY,BHUBANESWAR vs. CIT(EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 177/CTK/2018[2017-08]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack17 Feb 2020AY 2017-08

Bench: Shri Chandra Mohan Garg & Laxmi Prasad Sahutrident Academy Of Creative Vs. Cit (Exemptions) Hyderabad Technology, Plot No.F2/B1, Chandaka Industrial Estate, Chandrasekharpur, Bhubaneswar. Pan/Gir No.Aabtt 0273 H (Appellant) .. ( Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Dillip Mohanty, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.K. Goutam, CIT DR
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(vi)

vi) of the Income tax Act, 1961. 2. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: “1. That the order of the Ld. CIT(E), rejecting the application for granting registration u/s 80G of the Act is void abinitio, against the natural justice, unjustified, erroneous, arbitrary, contrary to facts, bad in law, without jurisdiction and/or excess of jurisdiction

KALINGA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION TRUST,BHUBANESWAR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee trust are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 202/CTK/2019[2019-10]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack19 Nov 2019AY 2019-10

Bench: Shri Before Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Judicial & Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri G.Naik/Rajat KarFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Keshkamat
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G(5)(vi)

80G(5)(vi) of the Act on various frivolous and baseless grounds including a ground that the assessee is not a public trust but a private trust relying on clause 4 of the Trust deed as observed in para 4.6 of the impugned order of the ld CIT (E) dated 30.4.2019. Drawing our attention to pages

KALINGA INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION TRUST,BHUBANESWAR vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee trust are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 203/CTK/2019[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack19 Nov 2019AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Before Shri Chandra Mohan Garg, Judicial & Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Laxmi Prasad Sahu & Laxmi Prasad Sahu

For Appellant: Shri G.Naik/Rajat KarFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Keshkamat
Section 12ASection 2(15)Section 80G(5)(vi)

80G(5)(vi) of the Act on various frivolous and baseless grounds including a ground that the assessee is not a public trust but a private trust relying on clause 4 of the Trust deed as observed in para 4.6 of the impugned order of the ld CIT (E) dated 30.4.2019. Drawing our attention to pages

XAVIER UNIVERSITY,PIPILI vs. ITO(EEXEMPTIONS), BHUBANESWAR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 455/CTK/2019[2019-20]Status: HeardITAT Cuttack01 Jun 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Before S/Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpia & Arun Khodpiaassessment Year : 2019-2020 2020 Xavier University, Plot No.12(A0, Xavier University, Plot No.12(A0, Vs. Cit (Exemptions), Cit (Exemptions), Nijigarh, Kurki, Harirajpur, Pipili, Nijigarh, Kurki, Harirajpur, Pipili, Hyderabad Puri Pan/Gir No. No. (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri P.R.Mohanty P.R.Mohanty, Ar Revenue By : Shri M.K.Gautam, Cit (Dr) Date Of Hearing : 01 /6/ 20 / 2022 Date Of Pronouncement : 01 / /6/2022 O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri P.R.MohantyFor Respondent: Shri M.K.Gautam
Section 12ASection 80GSection 80G(5)(vi)

80G(5)(vi) of the Act for the assessment year 2019-2020 2020. 2. Shri P.R.Mohanty, ld AR appeared for the assessee and Shri Shri P.R.Mohanty, ld AR appeared for the assessee and Shri Shri P.R.Mohanty, ld AR appeared for the assessee and Shri M.K.Gautam, ld CIT DR appeared for the revenue M.K.Gautam, ld CIT DR appeared for the revenue

GRAMYA VIKAS SANGATHAN,NABARANGPUR vs. CIT (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 38/CTK/2019[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack08 Nov 2019AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri C.M. Garg, Jm & Shri L.P. Sahu, Am आयकर अपीऱ सं./Ita No.38/Ctk/2019 (नििाारण वषा / Assessment Year :Na) Gramya Vikas Sangathan, Vs. Cit(Exemptions), At-Tota Sahi, Hyderabad-500004 Po/Dist-Nabarangapur, Odisha-764059 स्थायी लेखा सं./Panno. : Aaatg 7179 A (अऩीलाथी /Appellant) (प्रत्यथी / Respondent) .. ननधाारिती की ओर से /Assessee By : Shri G.Naik/Rajat Kar,Advocates िाजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri S.M.Keshkamat, Citdr

For Appellant: Shri G.Naik/Rajat Kar,AdvocatesFor Respondent: Shri S.M.Keshkamat, CITDR
Section 11(1)(a)Section 143(3)Section 80GSection 80G(5)(vi)

Section 80G of the Act, the CIT(E) has erred in observing that the assessee has not carried out any charitable activities. To substantiate the activities, the assessee has filed the paper book containing pages 1 to 235 and prayed for grant of approval u/s.80G(5)(vi) of the Act for exemption. 5. Contra, ld. DR submitted the order

PEOPLES FORUM,BHUBANESWAR,ODISHA vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), CIT(EXEMPTION)HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed and the stay petition stands dismissed as withdrawn

ITA 358/CTK/2023[Not Applicable]Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack22 Apr 2024

Bench: Before Shri George Mathan, Judicial & Manish Agarwal Manish Agarwals.P. No.12/Ctk/2023 People People Forums Forums, Hig-97, Vs. Cit (Exemptions), Cit (Exemptions), Dharma Vihar, Khandagiri, Dharma Vihar, Khandagiri, Hyderabad Hyderabad Bhubaneswar Bhubaneswar Pan/Gir No Pan/Gir No.Aaatpo 2214 R (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee By : Shri S.K.Agrawala, Ca/S.K.Hota, Adv /S.K.Hota, Adv Revenue By : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Ld : Shri Sanjay Kumar, Ld Cit Dr

For Appellant: Shri S.K.Agrawala, CA/S.K.Hota, AdvFor Respondent: Shri Sanjay Kumar, ld
Section 12ASection 80G

5 | 19 S.P. No.12/CTK/2023 (iii)Thus, it shows that the Society in your case is not running as a charitable Society but as a Commercial entity and hence, not falling under the provisions of section 2(15) of the I T . Act, 1961. 4. Under the above circumstances, ie., when the Society in your case running