BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

26 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Raipur38Delhi28Cochin26Jaipur22Karnataka21Ahmedabad15Nagpur9Bangalore6Chandigarh5Mumbai5Visakhapatnam4Chennai3Kolkata2Surat2Lucknow2Guwahati1Panaji1SC1

Key Topics

Section 20127TDS25Section 123Section 220(2)23Section 246A23Section 201(1)23Section 271B5Section 44A4Section 271C4Penalty

M/S.VIJAYA HOSPITALITY AND RESORTS LTD,ERNAKULAM vs. THE ADCIT(TDS), COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 96/COCH/2015[2010-11]Status: HeardITAT Cochin24 Jun 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George George K, Jm & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahu, Am

For Appellant: Sri.Thomas Joseph, CAFor Respondent: Smt.J.M.Jamunna Devi, Sr.DR
Section 271CSection 273Section 273B

condone the delay in filing this appeal and proceed to dispose of this appeal on merits. 3. The solitary issue raised is whether the CIT(A) is justified in confirming the Assessing Officer’s order, wherein penalty 2 ITA No.96/Coch/2015. M/s.Vijaya Hospitality and Resorts Limited. has been imposed u/s 271C of the I.T.Act amounting to Rs.9

M/S.JEENA HOTEL & UDAYA BAR,ALAPPUZHA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-1,, ALAPPUZHA

Showing 1–20 of 26 · Page 1 of 2

2

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 265/COCH/2018[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin01 Aug 2019AY 2008-09

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

Section 271BSection 44A

condone the delay of 71 days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication. 3. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: 1. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals) erred in confirming the penalty of Rs.1 lakh levied u/s. 271B of the Income Tax Act. I.T.A. No.265/Coch/2018 2. The learned Commissioner of Income-tax(Appeals

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 465/COCH/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 459/COCH/2022[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 461/COCH/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 464/COCH/2022[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 445/COCH/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 452/COCH/2022[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 463/COCH/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 460/COCH/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 466/COCH/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 455/COCH/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 457/COCH/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 443/COCH/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 448/COCH/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 451/COCH/2022[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 449/COCH/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 450/COCH/2022[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 444/COCH/2022[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

ITA 458/COCH/2022[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin13 Dec 2022AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Smt. Krishna K., AdvFor Respondent: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R
Section 1Section 201Section 201(1)Section 220(2)Section 246A

delay with reasonable cause, we hold that the CIT(A) ought to have condoned the same followed by adequate opportunities for presenting it’s case(s) on merits. 6. Wereject the Revenue’s vehement contention supporting the CIT(A)’s reasoning therefore and restore these six quantum appeals ITA Nos. 461 to 446/Coch/2022 back