BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 144Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai80Chennai53Ahmedabad25Pune20Delhi18Hyderabad16Chandigarh14Bangalore13Jaipur9Surat8Agra6Indore6Kolkata6Cochin5Visakhapatnam5Rajkot4Nagpur3Cuttack2

Key Topics

Section 1122Section 12A21Section 139(1)18Section 14810Section 1475Section 272A(2)(e)5Charitable Trust5Exemption5Section 1394

S N D P YOGAM KOZHENCHERRY UNION,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. ITO, WARD 2, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 244/COCH/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am

For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 2Section 2(24)

144B of the Act at a total income of Rs.17,92,645/-. While doing so, the AO brought to tax a sum of Rs. 21,26,524/- being the amount of donations received towards building fund by holding that in the absence of certificate of registration u/s. 12AA of the Act exemption u/s. 11 cannot be granted. 4. Being aggrieved

Cash Deposit4
Section 42
Deduction2

S N D P YOGAM KOZHENCHERRY UNION,PATHANAMTHITTA vs. ITO, WARD 2, THIRUVALLA

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 243/COCH/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin30 Apr 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am

For Appellant: ------- None -------For Respondent: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 11Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 2Section 2(24)

144B of the Act at a total income of Rs.17,92,645/-. While doing so, the AO brought to tax a sum of Rs. 21,26,524/- being the amount of donations received towards building fund by holding that in the absence of certificate of registration u/s. 12AA of the Act exemption u/s. 11 cannot be granted. 4. Being aggrieved

ST JOSEPHS EDUCATIONAL AND CHARITABLE TRUST,KOTTAYAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION WARD), KOTTAYAM, KOTTAYAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed

ITA 641/COCH/2025[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin31 Oct 2025AY 2015-2016
For Appellant: \nShri P.V. Chacko, CAFor Respondent: \nSmt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R
Section 12ASection 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 272A(2)(e)

charitable trust, did not file a return of income under section 139(1) for AY 2014-15, but filed one in response to a notice under section 148. The assessment resulted in Nil income. A penalty was levied under section 272A(2)(e) for not filing the return within the prescribed time.", "held": "The Tribunal held that filing a return

INCOME TAX OFFICER, KOCHI vs. KERALA PROVINCE OF THE CONGREGATION OF THE CARMELITE SISTERS OF ST TERESA, COCHIN

In the result, the appeals filed by Revenue stand dismissed

ITA 241/COCH/2025[2015]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Jm

For Appellant: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.RFor Respondent: ------- None -------
Section 11Section 12ASection 139Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 4

144B of the Act at a total income of Rs. 2,13,98,026/-. While doing so, the AO denied the claim for exemption u/s. 11 of the Act solely on the ground that the return of income was not filed within the due date prescribed u/s. 139(1) of the Act. Accordingly, income applied towards charitable purposes

INCOME TAX OFFICER, ERNAKULAM vs. KERALA PROVINCE OF THE CONGREGATION OF THE CARMELITE SISTERS OF ST TERESA, COCHIN

In the result, the appeals filed by Revenue stand dismissed

ITA 242/COCH/2025[2016]Status: DisposedITAT Cochin27 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao, Am & Shri Prakash Chand Yadav, Jm

For Appellant: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.RFor Respondent: ------- None -------
Section 11Section 12ASection 139Section 139(1)Section 147Section 148Section 4

144B of the Act at a total income of Rs. 2,13,98,026/-. While doing so, the AO denied the claim for exemption u/s. 11 of the Act solely on the ground that the return of income was not filed within the due date prescribed u/s. 139(1) of the Act. Accordingly, income applied towards charitable purposes