INCOME TAX OFFICER, ERNAKULAM vs. KERALA PROVINCE OF THE CONGREGATION OF THE CARMELITE SISTERS OF ST TERESA, COCHIN
Facts
The assessee, a charitable trust, did not file its income tax return for AY 2015-16 within the due date. The AO, after issuing a notice under Section 148, denied the exemption claimed under Section 11 solely on the ground of belated filing. The CIT(A) allowed the exemption, holding that Section 12A(ba) which makes timely filing mandatory, is prospective from AY 2018-19, leading to the Revenue's appeal before the Tribunal.
Held
The Tribunal concurred with the CIT(A), stating that Section 12A(ba), inserted by the Finance Act, 2017, and mandating timely return filing for Section 11 exemption, is prospective in application from AY 2018-19. Consequently, for the Assessment Years prior to 2018-19, the exemption under Section 11 cannot be denied merely due to non-filing of the return within the due date under Section 139(1).
Key Issues
Whether Section 12A(ba) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, requiring timely filing of return for claiming exemption under Section 11, applies retrospectively or prospectively, specifically for Assessment Years prior to 2018-19.
Sections Cited
11, 12A, 12A(ba), 139(1), 139(4A), 144B, 147, 148
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, COCHIN BENCH
Before: SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM & SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JM
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH BEFORE SHRI INTURI RAMA RAO, AM AND SHRI PRAKASH CHAND YADAV, JM ITA Nos. 241 & 242/Coch/2025 Assessment Years: 2015-16 & 2016-17 The Income Tax Officer .......... Appellant Aayakar Bhavan, Old. Rly. Stn., Kochi 682018 vs. Kerala Province of the Congregation .......... Respondent of the Carmelite Sisters of St. Teresa St. Theresas Provincial House, BMC P.O. Chembumukku, Thrikkara 682021 [PAN: AAATK3501G] Appellant by: Smt. Leena Lal, Sr. D.R. Respondent by: ------- None ------- Date of Hearing: 20.05.2025 Date of Pronouncement: 27.06.2025 O R D E R Per: Inturi Rama Rao, AM These appeals filed by the Revenue are directed against the different orders of the National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [CIT(A)], dated 03.02.2025 for Assessment Years (AY) 2015-16 & 2016-17.
Since identical issues and facts are involved in these appeals, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order.
2 ITA Nos. 241 & 242/Coch/2025 Kerala Province of the Congregation of the Carmelite Sisters of St. Teresa 3. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant to the appeal bearing ITA No. 241/Coch/2025 for AY 2015-16 are stated herein
Brief facts of the case are that the appellant is a charitable trust duly registered u/s. 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act). No regular return of income u/s. 139(1) of the Act was filed for the assessment year under consideration. The AO, on receipt of information that the appellant trust made cash deposit of Rs. 2,70,90,335/- and interest of Rs. 8,78,586/- was earned and made term deposit of Rs. 30,00,000/- with banking companies, formed an opinion that income escaped assessment to tax. Accordingly, notice u/s. 148 of the Act was issued to the appellant. In response to the notice the appellant filed return of income disclosing Nil income after claiming exemption u/s. 11 of the Act. Against the said return of income, the assessment was completed by the Income Tax Officer, Ernakulam (hereinafter called "the AO") vide order dated 01.03.2024 passed u/s. 147 r.w.s 144B of the Act at a total income of Rs. 2,13,98,026/-. While doing so, the AO denied the claim for exemption u/s. 11 of the Act solely on the ground that the return of income was not filed within the due date prescribed u/s. 139(1) of the Act. Accordingly, income applied towards charitable purposes was not treated as eligible for deduction and brought to tax a sum of Rs. 2,13,98,026/-.
3 ITA Nos. 241 & 242/Coch/2025 Kerala Province of the Congregation of the Carmelite Sisters of St. Teresa 5. Being aggrieved, an appeal was filed before the CIT(A), who vide the impugned order allowed the appeal by holding that filing the return of income within the due date prescribed u/s. 139(1) is not a condition precedent for claiming exemption u/s. 11 of the Act for the assessment years prior to 2018-19. Provisions of section 12A(ba) was inserted by Finance Act, 2017 have prospective application from AY 2018-19 onwards. Accordingly, allowed the claim for deduction u/s. 11 of the Act.
Being aggrieved, the appellant is in appeal before this Tribunal in the present appeal.
When the appeal was called on nobody appeared on behalf of the assessee despite due service of notice of hearing. Therefore, we proceed to dispose of the appeal after hearing the learned Sr. DR.
The learned Sr. DR submits that provisions of section 12A(ba) inserted by Finance Act, 2017 have retrospective effect. Non filing of return of income within the due date specified u/s. 139(1) is fatal for denial of exemption u/s. 11 of the Act.
The issue that arise for our consideration is whether the CIT(A) was justified in allowing exemption u/s. 11 of the Act by holding that provisions of section 12A(ba) have prospective application from AY 2018-19. On a mere perusal of the assessment order, it would reveal that the AO had denied exemption u/s. 11 solely on the ground that the appellant trust had failed to file return
4 ITA Nos. 241 & 242/Coch/2025 Kerala Province of the Congregation of the Carmelite Sisters of St. Teresa of income within the due date mentioned in section 139(1) of the Act. Provisions of section 12A(ba) were inserted by Finance Act, 2017 w.e.f. 01.04.2018 to provide that the person in receipt of income u/s. 11 should furnish return of income for the assessment year under consideration in accordance with the provisions of sub- section 4(a) of section 139 within the time allowed u/s. 139 otherwise exemption u/s. 11 cannot be allowed. These provisions were specifically made applicable from AY 2018-19 and subsequent years. This was clarified by the Board Circular. Therefore, for the period prior to AY 2018-19 provisions of section 12A(ba) have no application. In the circumstances, we do not find any illegality or perversity in the findings of the CIT(A).
Since identical issued are involved in all other appeal, ITA No. 242/Coch/2025, the above findings are mutatis mutandis apply to this appeals also.
In the result, the appeals filed by Revenue stand dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 27th June, 2025.
Sd/- Sd/- (PRAKASH CHAND YADAV) (INTURI RAMA RAO) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Cochin, Dated: 27th June, 2025 n.p.
5 ITA Nos. 241 & 242/Coch/2025 Kerala Province of the Congregation of the Carmelite Sisters of St. Teresa Copy to:
The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. The Pr. CIT concerned 4. The Sr. DR, ITAT, Cochin 5. Guard File By Order
Assistant Registrar ITAT, Cochin
6 ITA Nos. 241 & 242/Coch/2025 Kerala Province of the Congregation of the Carmelite Sisters of St. Teresa S.No. Details Date Initials Designation 1 Draft dictated on 19.05.2025 Sr. PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 22.05.2025 Sr. PS/PS Draft proposed & placed before the Second 3 JM/AM Member Draft discussed/approved by Second 4 AM/AM Member 5 Approved Draft comes to the Sr. PS/PS Sr. PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement Sr. PS/PS 7 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr. PS/PS 8 Date on which the file goes to Head Clerk 9 Date on which file goes to A.R. 10 Date of Dispatch of order
