THE HEAD MISTRESS,A.V.HIGH SCHOOL, PONNANNI,MALAPPURAM vs. THE ACIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

246A(1)(a), and, therefore, the CIT(A) ought to have examined legality of the adjustment made under this intimation in the light of the scope of the section 200A. Learned CIT(A) has not done so. He has justified the levy of fees on the basis of 6 I.T.A. Nos.236-242/C/2017 the provisions of Section 234E. That

THE HEAD MISTRESS,A.V.HIGH SCHOOL, PONNANNI,MALAPPURAM vs. THE ACIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

246A(1)(a), and, therefore, the CIT(A) ought to have examined legality of the adjustment made under this intimation in the light of the scope of the section 200A. Learned CIT(A) has not done so. He has justified the levy of fees on the basis of 6 I.T.A. Nos.236-242/C/2017 the provisions of Section 234E. That

THE HEAD MISTRESS,A.V.HIGH SCHOOL, PONNANNI,MALAPPURAM vs. THE ACIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

246A(1)(a), and, therefore, the CIT(A) ought to have examined legality of the adjustment made under this intimation in the light of the scope of the section 200A. Learned CIT(A) has not done so. He has justified the levy of fees on the basis of 6 I.T.A. Nos.236-242/C/2017 the provisions of Section 234E. That

THE HEAD MISTRESS,A.V.HIGH SCHOOL, PONNANNI,MALAPPURAM vs. THE ACIT, CALICUT

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: S/Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & George George K., Jm

246A(1)(a), and, therefore, the CIT(A) ought to have examined legality of the adjustment made under this intimation in the light of the scope of the section 200A. Learned CIT(A) has not done so. He has justified the levy of fees on the basis of 6 I.T.A. Nos.236-242/C/2017 the provisions of Section 234E. That

THE HEAD MISTRESS, AKILIYATH LP SCHOOL,KANNUR vs. THE ACIT, COCHIN

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee allowed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari, Am & Shri George George K, Jm

246A(1)(a), and, therefore, the CIT(A) ought to have examined legality of the adjustment made under this intimation in the light of the scope of the section 200A. Learned CIT(A) has not done so. He has justified the levy of fees on the basis of the provisions of Section 234E. That is not the issue here

SRI. GEORGE MATHEW,COCHIN vs. THE ITO, COCHIN

In the result, appeal of the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuteam Sustain Cr Building Vs. Plot No. 71, Mra I.S. Press Rod Kakkanadu, Kochi 682030 Kochi 682018 Pan – Adwpm1819L Appellant Respondent

TDS liability may arise if composite bills have been issued.” “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in sustaining the addition of Rs. 25,00,000/- made by the assessing officer treating Agricultural Income as Business Income. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in sustaining the addition of 10% of expenses amounting

THE ACIT, COCHIN vs. SRI. GEORGE MATHEW, COCHIN

In the result, appeal of the Revenue as well as the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri George George K. & Shri Laxmi Prasad Sahuteam Sustain Cr Building Vs. Plot No. 71, Mra I.S. Press Rod Kakkanadu, Kochi 682030 Kochi 682018 Pan – Adwpm1819L Appellant Respondent

TDS liability may arise if composite bills have been issued.” “1. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in sustaining the addition of Rs. 25,00,000/- made by the assessing officer treating Agricultural Income as Business Income. 2. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has erred in sustaining the addition of 10% of expenses amounting

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

TDS, Kochi Thodupuzh Idukki 685605 PAN –AAATN9216B Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Smt. Krishna K., Adv. Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 11.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 13.12.2022 O R D E R Per: S.S. Godara, J.M. The instant batch of above twenty twostay applications and twenty four main appeals pertains to a single assessee herein

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

TDS, Kochi Thodupuzh Idukki 685605 PAN –AAATN9216B Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Smt. Krishna K., Adv. Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 11.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 13.12.2022 O R D E R Per: S.S. Godara, J.M. The instant batch of above twenty twostay applications and twenty four main appeals pertains to a single assessee herein

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

TDS, Kochi Thodupuzh Idukki 685605 PAN –AAATN9216B Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Smt. Krishna K., Adv. Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 11.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 13.12.2022 O R D E R Per: S.S. Godara, J.M. The instant batch of above twenty twostay applications and twenty four main appeals pertains to a single assessee herein

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

TDS, Kochi Thodupuzh Idukki 685605 PAN –AAATN9216B Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Smt. Krishna K., Adv. Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 11.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 13.12.2022 O R D E R Per: S.S. Godara, J.M. The instant batch of above twenty twostay applications and twenty four main appeals pertains to a single assessee herein

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

TDS, Kochi Thodupuzh Idukki 685605 PAN –AAATN9216B Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Smt. Krishna K., Adv. Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 11.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 13.12.2022 O R D E R Per: S.S. Godara, J.M. The instant batch of above twenty twostay applications and twenty four main appeals pertains to a single assessee herein

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

TDS, Kochi Thodupuzh Idukki 685605 PAN –AAATN9216B Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Smt. Krishna K., Adv. Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 11.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 13.12.2022 O R D E R Per: S.S. Godara, J.M. The instant batch of above twenty twostay applications and twenty four main appeals pertains to a single assessee herein

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

TDS, Kochi Thodupuzh Idukki 685605 PAN –AAATN9216B Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Smt. Krishna K., Adv. Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 11.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 13.12.2022 O R D E R Per: S.S. Godara, J.M. The instant batch of above twenty twostay applications and twenty four main appeals pertains to a single assessee herein

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

TDS, Kochi Thodupuzh Idukki 685605 PAN –AAATN9216B Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Smt. Krishna K., Adv. Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 11.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 13.12.2022 O R D E R Per: S.S. Godara, J.M. The instant batch of above twenty twostay applications and twenty four main appeals pertains to a single assessee herein

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

TDS, Kochi Thodupuzh Idukki 685605 PAN –AAATN9216B Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Smt. Krishna K., Adv. Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 11.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 13.12.2022 O R D E R Per: S.S. Godara, J.M. The instant batch of above twenty twostay applications and twenty four main appeals pertains to a single assessee herein

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

TDS, Kochi Thodupuzh Idukki 685605 PAN –AAATN9216B Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Smt. Krishna K., Adv. Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 11.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 13.12.2022 O R D E R Per: S.S. Godara, J.M. The instant batch of above twenty twostay applications and twenty four main appeals pertains to a single assessee herein

M/S NOORUL ISLAM TRUST,THODUPUZHA vs. ACIT (TDS), KOCHI, KOCHI

Bench: Shri Satbeer Singh Godaraand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

TDS, Kochi Thodupuzh Idukki 685605 PAN –AAATN9216B Appellant Respondent Appellant by: Smt. Krishna K., Adv. Respondent by: Smt. J.M. Jamuna Devi, Sr. D.R. Date of Hearing: 11.11.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 13.12.2022 O R D E R Per: S.S. Godara, J.M. The instant batch of above twenty twostay applications and twenty four main appeals pertains to a single assessee herein