2,178 results for “section 68”+ Section 1(5)clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 2,178 · Page 1 of 109
Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Duvvuru R.L.Reddy)नधा+रण वष+ /Assessment Year: 2014-15 Heard Through Video Conferencing V. M/S.Srinivasa Fashions Pvt. Ltd., The Income Tax Officer, No.57G, Sidco Industrial Estate, Corporate Ward-6(4), Ambattur, Chennai. Chennai-600 098. [Pan: Aaics 9511 R] (अपीलाथ./Appellant) (/0यथ./Respondent) : अपीलाथ. क1 ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.N.Vijay Kumar, Ca : Mr.Ar.V.Sreenivasan, Jcit /0यथ. क1 ओर से /Respondent By : 28.09.2020 सुनवाई क1 तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 28.09.2020 घोषणा क1 तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement आदेश / O R D E R Per Ramit Kochar:
5. For that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred in upholding the addition of Rs.18,52,300/- as unexplained credit u/s.68. 6. For that the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) failed to appreciate that the provisions of section 68 are not invocable in the facts and circumstances of the case. 7. For that the Commissioner of Income