VANAVIL ESTATE,CHENNAI vs. PCIT(CENTRAL), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal for both AYs 2017

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.925 & 926/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 V. Vanavil Estate, The Pcit (Central), 4/20, Duraiswamy Reddy Street, Chennai-1. West Tambaram, Chennai-600 045. [Pan: Aalfv 0770 H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

reassessment order u/s 147 of the Act. On perusal of the framed the reassessment order u/s 147 of the Act. On perusal

VANAVIL ESTATE,CHENNAI vs. PCIT CENTRAL, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal for both AYs 2017

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.925 & 926/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2017-18 & 2018-19 V. Vanavil Estate, The Pcit (Central), 4/20, Duraiswamy Reddy Street, Chennai-1. West Tambaram, Chennai-600 045. [Pan: Aalfv 0770 H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

reassessment order u/s 147 of the Act. On perusal of the framed the reassessment order u/s 147 of the Act. On perusal

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

reassessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Act validity of the initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Act validity

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

reassessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Act validity of the initiation of reassessment proceedings u/s 147 of the Act validity

GOLDEN VATS PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed and the order passed by the Commissioner dated 14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri V. Durga Rao, Jm & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.416/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) M/S. Golden Vats Private Limited Acit बनाम New No.272, 3Rd Floor, Central Circle-3(2), Avvai Shanmugam Salai, Chennai. / Vs. Gopalapuram , Chennai-600 086. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaccg-9782-G (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (!"थ" / Respondent)

reassessment proceedings u/s 147 was pending against the assessee for this year. The assessment framed u/s 143(3) was already

TYSPL 100 ANDIMADAM PACCS LIMITED, ANDIMADAM vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX APPEAL, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon’Ble Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1428/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2019-20 Tyspl 100 Andimadam Paccs Income Tax Officer, Limited, Ward-1, Udiyarpalayam, Ariyalur, Kumbakonam. Perambalur, Tamil Nadu-621 801. [Pan: Aacat7731L] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : G.Reddi Prakash, C.A प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Mr.Krishna Kumar Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.08.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 20.08.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

reassessment u/s 148 can be issued by a faceless assessing officer only. It was urged that in the present case as the notice u/s 148 dated 31.03.2023 was issued by the jurisdictional assessing officer the same was invalid and consequently the assessment order u/s 147

SYED BATHRUDEEN MOHIDEEN AWLIYA,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-19(6), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1308/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2015-16 Syed Bathrudeen Mohideen Income Tax Officer, Awliya, Non-Corp Ward-19(6), No.8/13-C Kamaraj Nagar, Chennai. 3Rd Street, Pallavaram, Chennai-600 043. [Pan: Axrpm7549Q] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Ms.S.Sonali & Mr.S.P.Chidambaram, Advocates. प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Ms.V.Supraja, Addl.Cit

reassessment u/s 148 can be issued by a faceless assessing officer only. It was urged that in the present case as the notice u/s 148 dated 30.03.2022 was issued by the jurisdictional assessing officer the same was invalid and consequently the assessment order u/s 147

MANIMALA,PUDUCHERRY vs. ITO, WARD-3,, PUDUCHERRY

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2102/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2019-20 Manimala Income Tax Officer, 50A Saint Simone Pet, Ward-3, Muthialpet, Pondicherry Pondicherry-605 003. [Pan: Baspm8411L] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Mr.Suraj Nahar, C.A प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Mr.Saujanya Ranjan, Irs सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 25.09.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

reassessment u/s 148 can be issued by a faceless assessing officer only. It was urged that in the present case as the notice u/s 148 dated 29.03.2023 was issued by the jurisdictional assessing officer the same was invalid and consequently the assessment order u/s 147

ORUVANDUR PACB LTD,NAMAKKAL vs. ITO, WARD 2, NAMAKKAL, NAMAKKAL

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2117/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2019-20 Oruvandur Pacb Ltd, Income Tax Officer, Orunvandur Po, Ward-2, Namakkal, Namakkal Tamil Nadu-637015, [Pan: Aaaao0407C] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Mr.T.S.Lakshmi Venkataraman, C.A प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Mr.Saujanya Ranjan, Irs सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.09.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 25.09.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

reassessment u/s 148 can be issued by a faceless assessing officer only. It was urged that in the present case as Page - 2 - of 9 the notice u/s 148 dated 30.03.2023 was issued by the jurisdictional assessing officer the same was invalid and consequently the assessment order u/s 147

VENUGOPAL RAVICHANDRAN,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NON CORP WARD 19(6)M CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2121/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2016-17 Venugopal Ravichandran Income Tax Officer, Old No.5, New No.7, Bhavani Street, Non Corp Ward-19(6), Bharathi Nagar, Tharamani, Ttti, Chennai. Taramani S.O, Taramani, Chennai-600 113. [Pan: Adypr7701G] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Mr.T.S.Lakshmi Venkataraman,Fca प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Mr.Saujanya Ranjan, Irs सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.09.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 25.09.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

reassessment u/s 148 can be issued by a faceless assessing officer only. It was urged that in the present case as the notice u/s 148 dated 30.03.2023 was issued by the jurisdictional assessing officer the same was invalid and consequently the assessment order u/s 147

NEELAM DEVI GUPTA,AHMEDABAD vs. ASSESSMENT UNIT, INCOME TAX DEPARTMENT, ITO WARD-ERODE

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1310/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2018-19 Neelam Devi Gupta, Income Tax Officer, No.J-502, Safal Parivesh, Che-W-(65)(11). Prahladnagar, Chennai. Ahmedabad, Gujarat-380 015. [Pan: Acypg4898C] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : None प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Ms.V.Supraja, Addl.Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16.07.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 18.07.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

reassessment u/s 148 can be issued by a Page - 2 - of 9 faceless assessing officer only. It was urged that in the present case as the notice u/s 148 dated 31.03.2022 was issued by the jurisdictional assessing officer the same was invalid and consequently the assessment order u/s 147

MRS. ROOPA RATHI,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-10(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1707/Chny/2025 Assessment Years: 2018-19 Mrs.Roopa Rathi, Income Tax Officer, Door No.1, Damodar Murthy Street, Non-Corporate Ward-10(3), Kilpauk, Chennai. Chennai-600 010. [Pan: Ajapr6077R] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Mr.Hitesh, Advocate For Mr.D.Anand, Advocate. प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Ms.Gouthami Manivasagam, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 25.08.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.09.2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M :

reassessment u/s 148 can be issued by a Page - 2 - of 9 faceless assessing officer only. It was urged that in the present case as the notice u/s 148 dated 30.03.2022 was issued by the jurisdictional assessing officer the same was invalid and consequently the assessment order u/s 147

EKAMBARAM ELUMALAI,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-19(4), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

reassessment u/s 148 can be issued by a faceless assessing\nofficer only. It was urged that in the present case as the notice u/s 148\ndated 30.07.2022 was issued by the jurisdictional assessing officer the\nsame was invalid and consequently the assessment order u/s 147

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI vs. M/S THULASI & OTHERS, CHENNAI

The appeal stands dismissed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Mahavir Singh, Vp & Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.18/Chny/2021 (िनधा*रण वष* / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Dcit M/S. Thulasi & Others बनाम/ 32, (Old No.43), 2Nd Floor, Non-Corporate Circle-8(1) Chennai. K.Bharathidasan Salai, Siet College Road Vs. Alwarpet, Chennai-600 018. "थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./Pan/Gir No. Aaofm-9784-F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) : (" थ" / Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Appellant By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal (Jcit)- Ld. Dr " थ"कीओरसे/Respondent By : Shri S. Sridhar (Advocate)-Ld.Ar सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21-06-2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 08-09-2023 आदेश / O R D E R

reassess u/s 147 of the Act. The want of a valid notice affects the Jurisdiction of the A.O to proceed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. OASYS CYBERMATICS PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: MS. PADMAVATHY S (Accountant Member), SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI (Judicial Member)

reassessment u/s. 147 of the Act was completed on 31.03.2022 incorporating the above additions. 7. Aggrieved by the reassessment

M/S. ASHOK LEYLAND LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, NCC-8(1), LTU-II,, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

147 provides that where the Assessing Officer has reason to believe escapement of income [is the jurisdictional fact & law] he shall record his reasons for doing so and assess or reassess the income which has escaped assessment; and for exercising revisional jurisdiction u/s

EDWIN SELVARAJ SUNDRARAJ,SALEM vs. THE ITO, WARD -1(4), SALEM

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 783/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2014-15

reassessment order passed u/s 147 of the IT Act and has also argued that reassessment proceedings are bad in law. Based

THINGAL OLI MANIMEKALAI,THANJAVUR vs. ITO, WARD-1,, THANJAVUR

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

reassessment u/s 148 can be\nissued by a faceless assessing officer only. It was urged that in the present case as\nthe notice u/s 148 dated 31.03.2022 was issued by the jurisdictional assessing officer\nthe same was invalid and consequently the assessment order u/s 147