BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

195 results for “reassessment u/s 147”+ Penaltyclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai951Delhi814Jaipur341Ahmedabad325Pune197Chennai195Bangalore193Hyderabad179Kolkata163Rajkot99Raipur93Indore84Chandigarh81Surat72Cochin52Amritsar47Lucknow41Agra38Nagpur38Guwahati38Patna34Cuttack34Visakhapatnam30Dehradun27Allahabad26Jodhpur13Jabalpur10Karnataka10Telangana7SC4Varanasi3Ranchi2Orissa2Uttarakhand1Gauhati1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 14777Section 143(3)75Section 14861Addition to Income41Penalty38Section 271(1)(c)31Section 153C29Reassessment29Section 11

M/S. ANISHKUMAR MALE CHILD TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 3257/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 147Section 246A

u/s 147. 5. Before us, the ld.counsel for the assessee Shri J. Prabakar, FCA, first of all argued that CIT(A) has erred while holding that the impugned order of the AO i.e., the speaking order is not order passed u/s.147 of the Act and that an appeal against such order is legally untenable in the given facts and circumstances

M/S. ANISH KUMAR EDUCATION TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 3254/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Showing 1–20 of 195 · Page 1 of 10

...
24
Section 133A20
Section 26318
Disallowance18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 147Section 246A

u/s 147. 5. Before us, the ld.counsel for the assessee Shri J. Prabakar, FCA, first of all argued that CIT(A) has erred while holding that the impugned order of the AO i.e., the speaking order is not order passed u/s.147 of the Act and that an appeal against such order is legally untenable in the given facts and circumstances

M/S. ARCHANA FEMALE CHILD TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW - 11 (1),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 3250/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 147Section 246A

u/s 147. 5. Before us, the ld.counsel for the assessee Shri J. Prabakar, FCA, first of all argued that CIT(A) has erred while holding that the impugned order of the AO i.e., the speaking order is not order passed u/s.147 of the Act and that an appeal against such order is legally untenable in the given facts and circumstances

ANISH KUMAR WIFE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW - 11 (1),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 2849/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 147Section 246A

u/s 147. 5. Before us, the ld.counsel for the assessee Shri J. Prabakar, FCA, first of all argued that CIT(A) has erred while holding that the impugned order of the AO i.e., the speaking order is not order passed u/s.147 of the Act and that an appeal against such order is legally untenable in the given facts and circumstances

ANISH KUMAR MARRIAGE TRUST,,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCC - 11 (1),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 3259/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 147Section 246A

u/s 147. 5. Before us, the ld.counsel for the assessee Shri J. Prabakar, FCA, first of all argued that CIT(A) has erred while holding that the impugned order of the AO i.e., the speaking order is not order passed u/s.147 of the Act and that an appeal against such order is legally untenable in the given facts and circumstances

M/S. ANISH KUMAR EDUCATION TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 3255/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 147Section 246A

u/s 147. 5. Before us, the ld.counsel for the assessee Shri J. Prabakar, FCA, first of all argued that CIT(A) has erred while holding that the impugned order of the AO i.e., the speaking order is not order passed u/s.147 of the Act and that an appeal against such order is legally untenable in the given facts and circumstances

ANISH KUMAR MARRIAGE TRUST,,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCC - 11 (1),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 3258/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 147Section 246A

u/s 147. 5. Before us, the ld.counsel for the assessee Shri J. Prabakar, FCA, first of all argued that CIT(A) has erred while holding that the impugned order of the AO i.e., the speaking order is not order passed u/s.147 of the Act and that an appeal against such order is legally untenable in the given facts and circumstances

M/S. ANISHKUMAR MALE CHILD TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 3256/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 147Section 246A

u/s 147. 5. Before us, the ld.counsel for the assessee Shri J. Prabakar, FCA, first of all argued that CIT(A) has erred while holding that the impugned order of the AO i.e., the speaking order is not order passed u/s.147 of the Act and that an appeal against such order is legally untenable in the given facts and circumstances

ANISH KUMAR WIFE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW - 11 (1),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 3251/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 147Section 246A

u/s 147. 5. Before us, the ld.counsel for the assessee Shri J. Prabakar, FCA, first of all argued that CIT(A) has erred while holding that the impugned order of the AO i.e., the speaking order is not order passed u/s.147 of the Act and that an appeal against such order is legally untenable in the given facts and circumstances

M/S. ANISH KUMAR FEMALE CHILD TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 3253/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Mar 2021AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 147Section 246A

u/s 147. 5. Before us, the ld.counsel for the assessee Shri J. Prabakar, FCA, first of all argued that CIT(A) has erred while holding that the impugned order of the AO i.e., the speaking order is not order passed u/s.147 of the Act and that an appeal against such order is legally untenable in the given facts and circumstances

M/S. ANISH KUMAR FEMALE CHILD TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessees are dismissed

ITA 3252/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri G. Manjunatha

Section 147Section 246A

u/s 147. 5. Before us, the ld.counsel for the assessee Shri J. Prabakar, FCA, first of all argued that CIT(A) has erred while holding that the impugned order of the AO i.e., the speaking order is not order passed u/s.147 of the Act and that an appeal against such order is legally untenable in the given facts and circumstances

MERCY EDUCATION TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-19(6), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly-allowed

ITA 2231/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jan 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 2231/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 M/S. Mercy Education Trust, The Income Tax Officer, No.66, Sree Gokulam Towers, Vs. Non-Corporate Ward 19(6), Arcot Road, Chennai. Kodambakkam, Chennai – 600 024. Pan: Aactm 6190M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri N. Arjun Raj, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri N. Rajakumar, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 27.01.2026 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 29.01.2026

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri N. Rajakumar, Addl.CIT
Section 10Section 139Section 147Section 148Section 250Section 272A(2)(e)Section 273B

147 rws 144B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Penalty proceedings u/s 272A(2)(e) have been initiated separately for the year under consideration. Computation of income and demand notice u/s 156 of the Act is issued.” 10. The above reassessment

SHRI K.SRIKANTH,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the four appeals adjudicated by us in this order are partly allowed

ITA 307/CHNY/2010[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 May 2020AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Mr. S.Sridhar, AdvFor Respondent: Dr. M.Srinivasa Rao, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

reassessment proceedings objected to re-opening of the concluded assessment on jurisdictional ground, wherein, it was claimed that the formation of opinion later to the issuance of intimation u/s.143(1)(a) tantamount to change of opinion and hence only on fresh facts coming to the knowledge of the AO, the assessment can be re-opened. Secondly, it was submitted

SRI K.SRIKANTH,,CHENNAI vs. ACIT,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the four appeals adjudicated by us in this order are partly allowed

ITA 1016/CHNY/2012[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 May 2020AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Mr. S.Sridhar, AdvFor Respondent: Dr. M.Srinivasa Rao, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

reassessment proceedings objected to re-opening of the concluded assessment on jurisdictional ground, wherein, it was claimed that the formation of opinion later to the issuance of intimation u/s.143(1)(a) tantamount to change of opinion and hence only on fresh facts coming to the knowledge of the AO, the assessment can be re-opened. Secondly, it was submitted

ACIT,, CHENNAI vs. SRI. K.SRIKANTH,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the four appeals adjudicated by us in this order are partly allowed

ITA 1324/CHNY/2012[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 May 2020AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Mr. S.Sridhar, AdvFor Respondent: Dr. M.Srinivasa Rao, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

reassessment proceedings objected to re-opening of the concluded assessment on jurisdictional ground, wherein, it was claimed that the formation of opinion later to the issuance of intimation u/s.143(1)(a) tantamount to change of opinion and hence only on fresh facts coming to the knowledge of the AO, the assessment can be re-opened. Secondly, it was submitted

SRI K.SRIKANTH,,CHENNAI vs. ACIT,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the four appeals adjudicated by us in this order are partly allowed

ITA 1015/CHNY/2012[2001-02]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 May 2020AY 2001-02

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Ramit Kochar

For Appellant: Mr. S.Sridhar, AdvFor Respondent: Dr. M.Srinivasa Rao, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 263

reassessment proceedings objected to re-opening of the concluded assessment on jurisdictional ground, wherein, it was claimed that the formation of opinion later to the issuance of intimation u/s.143(1)(a) tantamount to change of opinion and hence only on fresh facts coming to the knowledge of the AO, the assessment can be re-opened. Secondly, it was submitted

THE KUMBAKONAM CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK,KUMBAKONAM vs. CIT (APPEALS), -

In the result the appeals of the assessee are decided as under:-

ITA 584/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Feb 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon’Ble Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.583/Chny/2024, Assessment Year: 2013-14 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.584/Chny/2024, Assessment Year: 2020-21 The Kumbakonam Central Cooperative Bank, Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of No.150, T.S.R. Big Street, Income Tax (Appeals), Kumbakonam, Circle-1, Kumbakonam. Tamil Nadu-612001. [Pan: Aaaat0148B] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/Appellant)

For Appellant: Mr.Varun Ranganathan,Advocate for Mr.Ravi Kannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: A.Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 250Section 36(1)(viia)

penalty. Thus, an order u/s 251 is passed by the Ld. First Appellate Authority qua an order appealed against u/s 246. The most essential ingredient for appeal to be filed u/s 246 and for the Ld. First Appellate Authority to pass an order u/s 251 is the presence of element of assessee being “aggrieved”. 5.3 Coming to the grounds

THE KUMBAKONAM CENTRAL COOPERATIVE BANK,KUMBAKONAM vs. CIT (APPEALS), -

In the result the appeals of the assessee are decided as under:-

ITA 583/CHNY/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Feb 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Hon’Ble Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.583/Chny/2024, Assessment Year: 2013-14 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.584/Chny/2024, Assessment Year: 2020-21 The Kumbakonam Central Cooperative Bank, Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of No.150, T.S.R. Big Street, Income Tax (Appeals), Kumbakonam, Circle-1, Kumbakonam. Tamil Nadu-612001. [Pan: Aaaat0148B] (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/Appellant)

For Appellant: Mr.Varun Ranganathan,Advocate for Mr.Ravi Kannan, AdvocateFor Respondent: A.Sasikumar, CIT
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 250Section 36(1)(viia)

penalty. Thus, an order u/s 251 is passed by the Ld. First Appellate Authority qua an order appealed against u/s 246. The most essential ingredient for appeal to be filed u/s 246 and for the Ld. First Appellate Authority to pass an order u/s 251 is the presence of element of assessee being “aggrieved”. 5.3 Coming to the grounds

S. ARAVIND,KARUR vs. ITO, WARD-1,, KARUR

In the result, all the appeals t, all the appeals stand allowed

ITA 2584/CHNY/2024[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Apr 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

147 of the Act and such concluded assessment is being sought to be reopened beyond four years, concluded assessment is being sought to be reopened beyond four years, concluded assessment is being sought to be reopened beyond four years, ITA No.2587/CHNY/2024 & 22 others 2587/CHNY/2024 & 22 others (AYs 2012 (AYs 2012-13 & 2013-14) Shri M. Velusamy & others Shri M. Velusamy

P. KARUNANITHI,KARUR vs. ITO, WARD-1,, KARUR

In the result, all the appeals t, all the appeals stand allowed

ITA 2685/CHNY/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Apr 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

147 of the Act and such concluded assessment is being sought to be reopened beyond four years, concluded assessment is being sought to be reopened beyond four years, concluded assessment is being sought to be reopened beyond four years, ITA No.2587/CHNY/2024 & 22 others 2587/CHNY/2024 & 22 others (AYs 2012 (AYs 2012-13 & 2013-14) Shri M. Velusamy & others Shri M. Velusamy