V.R.VENKAATACHALAM,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI
In the result, the appeals of the assessee in ITA Nos
ITA 2638/CHNY/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Jul 2015AY 2010-11
Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri Challa Nagendra Prasadआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos.2634, 2635, 2636, 2637, 2638 & 2639/Mds/2014 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2006-07, 2007-08, 2008-09, 2009- 10, 2010-11 & 2011-2012)
For Appellant: Ms. S. Vidya, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. Pathlavath Peerya, IRS, CIT
Section 132Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 153ASection 263
166/- +65,78,171/-+ 1,00,000/-+13,61,60,759/-) from ₹.21,06,23,375/- (difference ₹ 22,19,29,721/-) liable to be considered as un-explained investment.
6.2. Comparison of three statement of affairs for assessment year
2006-2007 has shown following discrepancies.
a) The first
SOA shows loan received
(balance) of ₹15,83,40,723/-, the second