SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

10 ::\n153C could not have been issued at that time on account of being\nbeyond the time limit specified under the provisions of clause (b) of sub-\nsection (1) of this section or section 153A or section 153C, as the case\nmay be, as they stood immediately before the commencement of the\nFinance Act, 2021:\nProvided further that the provisions

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT.. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

10 ::\n153C could not have been issued at that time on account of being\nbeyond the time limit specified under the provisions of clause (b) of sub-\nsection (1) of this section or section 153A or section 153C, as the case\nmay be, as they stood immediately before the commencement of the\nFinance Act, 2021:\nProvided further that the provisions

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

10 ::\n153C could not have been issued at that time on account of being\nbeyond the time limit specified under the provisions of clause (b) of sub-\nsection (1) of this section or section 153A or section 153C, as the case\nmay be, as they stood immediately before the commencement of the\nFinance Act, 2021:\nProvided further that the provisions

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the\nassessee are dismissed

10 ::\n153C could not have been issued at that time on account of being\nbeyond the time limit specified under the provisions of clause (b) of sub-\nsection (1) of this section or section 153A or section 153C, as the case\nmay be, as they stood immediately before the commencement of the\nFinance Act, 2021:\nProvided further that the provisions

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, NUMGAMBAKKAM vs. JSR INFRA DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadish

10. The reliance on the decision of the Apex Court in Sun Engineering Works (P.) Ltd. (supra) by the Revenue is misplaced. The ) by the Revenue is misplaced. The above case dealt with re above case dealt with re-opening of an assessment under Section 147 of the Act. It was in that context that the of an assessment under

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

10 ::\n153C could not have been issued at that time on account of being\nbeyond the time limit specified under the provisions of clause (b) of sub-\nsection (1) of this section or section 153A or section 153C, as the case\nmay be, as they stood immediately before the commencement of the\nFinance Act, 2021:\nProvided further that the provisions

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 2 (2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

10 ::\n153C could not have been issued at that time on account of being\nbeyond the time limit specified under the provisions of clause (b) of sub-\nsection (1) of this section or section 153A or section 153C, as the case\nmay be, as they stood immediately before the commencement of the\nFinance Act, 2021:\nProvided further that the provisions

SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(2),, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

reassessment to the six assessment years will be examined with reference to such d examined with reference to such date." 9. It is evident on a plain interpretation of section 153C(1) that the 9. It is evident on a plain interpretation of section 153C(1) that the 9. It is evident on a plain interpretation of section 153C(1

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

In the result, both the both the appeals filed by the Revenue and the Revenue and the

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

reassessment to the six assessment years will be examined with reference to such d examined with reference to such date." 9. It is evident on a plain interpretation of section 153C(1) that the 9. It is evident on a plain interpretation of section 153C(1) that the 9. It is evident on a plain interpretation of section 153C(1

UNITED INDIA INSUANCE CO LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. PCIT 3, CHENNAI

reassessment order was not justified. Grounds related to provisions for diminution in the value of investments were also discussed.", "result": "Partly Allowed", "sections": [ "10(38)", "263", "143(3)", "142(1

JESUDASON BIJI ,CHENNAI vs. OFFICE OF INCOME TAX OFFICER INT. TAXN WARD1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

1 st April, 2021, according to learned ASG, the Revenue issued approximately 90,000 reassessment notices to the respective assessees under the erstwhile sections 148 to 151 thereof by relying on explanations in the Notifications dated 31st March, 2021 and 27th April, 2021. The said reassessment notices were the subject matter of writ petitions before the various High Courts

ST. JOHN FREIGHT SYSTEMS LTD.,TUTICORIN vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, MADURAI

In the result appeals filed in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Arun Khodpia, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.188 & 2898 To 2900/Chny/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08 To 2010-11 V. M/S.St.John Freight – The Dy. Commissioner- Systems Pvt. Ltd., Of Income Tax, C-98, Sipcot Complex, Central Circle-1, Harbour Express Road, Madurai. Tuticorin-628 008. [Pan:Aaacs 4697 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, Adv. ""थ" की ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.S.Senthil Kumaran, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 13.03.2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 06.04.2023

reassessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147, were as under: - 1. As per provisions of section 80AC, no deduction u/s 80IA shall be allowed unless the assessee furnishes a Return of Income for such Assessment Year on or before the due date of filing of return u/s 139 (1) of the Act. 2. The assessee has failed to enclose the certificate

ST. JOHN FREIGHT SYSTEMS PVT. LTD.,,TUTUCORIN vs. DCIT, CC-1,, MADURAI

In the result appeals filed in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Arun Khodpia, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.188 & 2898 To 2900/Chny/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08 To 2010-11 V. M/S.St.John Freight – The Dy. Commissioner- Systems Pvt. Ltd., Of Income Tax, C-98, Sipcot Complex, Central Circle-1, Harbour Express Road, Madurai. Tuticorin-628 008. [Pan:Aaacs 4697 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, Adv. ""थ" की ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.S.Senthil Kumaran, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 13.03.2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 06.04.2023

reassessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147, were as under: - 1. As per provisions of section 80AC, no deduction u/s 80IA shall be allowed unless the assessee furnishes a Return of Income for such Assessment Year on or before the due date of filing of return u/s 139 (1) of the Act. 2. The assessee has failed to enclose the certificate

ST. JOHN FREIGHT SYSTEMS LTD.,TUTICORIN vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, MADURAI

In the result appeals filed in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Arun Khodpia, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.188 & 2898 To 2900/Chny/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08 To 2010-11 V. M/S.St.John Freight – The Dy. Commissioner- Systems Pvt. Ltd., Of Income Tax, C-98, Sipcot Complex, Central Circle-1, Harbour Express Road, Madurai. Tuticorin-628 008. [Pan:Aaacs 4697 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, Adv. ""थ" की ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.S.Senthil Kumaran, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 13.03.2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 06.04.2023

reassessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147, were as under: - 1. As per provisions of section 80AC, no deduction u/s 80IA shall be allowed unless the assessee furnishes a Return of Income for such Assessment Year on or before the due date of filing of return u/s 139 (1) of the Act. 2. The assessee has failed to enclose the certificate

ST. JOHN FREIGHT SYSTEMS LTD.,TUTICORIN vs. DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 1, MADURAI

In the result appeals filed in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Arun Khodpia, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita Nos.188 & 2898 To 2900/Chny/2019 िनधा"रणवष"/Assessment Years: 2007-08 To 2010-11 V. M/S.St.John Freight – The Dy. Commissioner- Systems Pvt. Ltd., Of Income Tax, C-98, Sipcot Complex, Central Circle-1, Harbour Express Road, Madurai. Tuticorin-628 008. [Pan:Aaacs 4697 N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/ Appellant By : Mr.R.Vijayaraghavan, Adv. ""थ" की ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.S.Senthil Kumaran, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 13.03.2023 घोषणाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 06.04.2023

reassessment u/s 143(3) r.w.s. 147, were as under: - 1. As per provisions of section 80AC, no deduction u/s 80IA shall be allowed unless the assessee furnishes a Return of Income for such Assessment Year on or before the due date of filing of return u/s 139 (1) of the Act. 2. The assessee has failed to enclose the certificate

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

Section 153C(1) that the\nParliamentary intent to enact the proviso was to cater not merely to\nthe question of abatement but also with regard to the date from\nwhich the six year period was to be reckoned, in respect of which the\nreturns were to be filed by the third party (whose premises are not\nsearched and in respect

DCIT CC 2 2 , CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. SOUTHERN AGRIFURANE INDUSTRIES PVT LTD, CHENNAI

Section 153C(1) that the\nParliamentary intent to enact the proviso was to cater not merely to\nthe question of abatement but also with regard to the date from\nwhich the six year period was to be reckoned, in respect of which the\nreturns were to be filed by the third party (whose premises are not\nsearched and in respect

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE 1(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI vs. BONDALAPATI SHIVAJI RAO, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee stands allowed and appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1044/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20 V. Shri Bondalapati Shivaji Rao, The Dcit, 121, Shankar Nagar, M.G. Road, Central Circle-1(2), Pammal, Chennai-600 075. Chennai. [Pan: Aahpb 0083 D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1103/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20 V. The Dcit, Shri Bondalapati Shivaji Rao, Central Circle-1(2), 121, Shankar Nagar, Chennai. M.G. Road, Pammal, Chennai-600 075. [Pan: Aahpb 0083 D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent)

reassessment, as the case may be, would have to be undertaken in accordance with the provisions of section 153A. In terms of Finance Act, 2005, inter-alia the first proviso came to be inserted in section 153C(1) in the following terms:- ITA No.1103/Chny/2023 (AY 2019-20) Bondalapati Shivaji Rao :: 10