BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

70 results for “house property”+ Section 164clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka462Delhi394Mumbai347Surat136Bangalore114Chandigarh83Jaipur78Chennai70Ahmedabad55Lucknow42Raipur36Kolkata35Telangana32Cochin28Pune24Hyderabad23Indore20Calcutta17Visakhapatnam16Patna8Nagpur6SC5Rajasthan5Allahabad4Orissa3Rajkot3Agra3Jodhpur2Dehradun2Panaji2Andhra Pradesh1Amritsar1Punjab & Haryana1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)61Section 14758Section 143(1)44Section 164(1)42Section 1140Section 14836Addition to Income36Section 13(1)(c)30Exemption20

DYNACON EQUIPMENTS PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(4), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee in ITA

ITA 2172/CHNY/2018[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Nov 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Duvvuru R.L.Reddy

For Appellant: Mr.Srinivasa Rao Vana, JCITFor Respondent: 21.11.2019
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 14 of the 1961 Act , so that Revenue gets its legitimate share of correct taxes due from tax- payer for every assessment year. Since, we have held that rental income from the said factory land , building constructed thereon and 2 generators installed thereon shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head ‘Income from House Property’ and hence

DYNACON EQUIPMENTS PVT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(4), CHENNAI

Showing 1–20 of 70 · Page 1 of 4

Section 25018
Reopening of Assessment18
Disallowance15

In the result, the appeal filed by assessee in ITA

ITA 2263/CHNY/2018[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Nov 2019AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Ramit Kochar & Shri Duvvuru R.L.Reddy

For Appellant: Mr.Srinivasa Rao Vana, JCITFor Respondent: 21.11.2019
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

Section 14 of the 1961 Act , so that Revenue gets its legitimate share of correct taxes due from tax- payer for every assessment year. Since, we have held that rental income from the said factory land , building constructed thereon and 2 generators installed thereon shall be chargeable to income-tax under the head ‘Income from House Property’ and hence

SHRIRAM OWNERSHIP TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for both

ITA 406/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 May 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 406 & 407/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2013-2014 & 2014-2015. Shriram Ownership Trust, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of No.4, Shriram House, I Floor, Income Tax, Burkit Road, T. Nagar, Non Corporate Circle 2, Chennai 600 017. Chennai 600 034. [Pan Aagts 2243H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. R. Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Shaji P. Jacob, IRS, Addl. CIT
Section 144ASection 14ASection 160(1)Section 161(1)Section 2(31)Section 56Section 56(1)Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(vii)

House, I floor, Income Tax, Burkit Road, T. Nagar, Non Corporate Circle 2, Chennai 600 017. Chennai 600 034. [PAN AAGTS 2243H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri. R. Sivaraman, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent by : Shri. Shaji P. Jacob, IRS, Addl. CIT. : 22-06-2017 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing घोषणा

SHRIRAM OWNERSHIP TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for both

ITA 407/CHNY/2017[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai05 May 2017AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 406 & 407/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2013-2014 & 2014-2015. Shriram Ownership Trust, Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of No.4, Shriram House, I Floor, Income Tax, Burkit Road, T. Nagar, Non Corporate Circle 2, Chennai 600 017. Chennai 600 034. [Pan Aagts 2243H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. R. Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Shaji P. Jacob, IRS, Addl. CIT
Section 144ASection 14ASection 160(1)Section 161(1)Section 2(31)Section 56Section 56(1)Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(vii)

House, I floor, Income Tax, Burkit Road, T. Nagar, Non Corporate Circle 2, Chennai 600 017. Chennai 600 034. [PAN AAGTS 2243H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri. R. Sivaraman, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent by : Shri. Shaji P. Jacob, IRS, Addl. CIT. : 22-06-2017 सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date of Hearing घोषणा

SHRI V. NATARAJAN (INDIVIDUAL),RASIPURAM vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, SALEM

In the result, both the appeals of assessee in ITA No

ITA 1801/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1535 & 1801/Chny/2024 ननिाारण वर्ा/Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2015-16 V. Varadappan Natarajan/ The Acit, V. Natarajan (Individual), Central Circle, No.64-C, Rotary Nagar, Salem. Rasipuram Tamil Nadu-637 408. [Pan: Acgpn1477Q] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Mr.T.S. Lakshmi Venkataraman, Fca (Virtual) प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.Shiva Srinivas, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09.10.2025 घोर्णाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.10.2025

For Appellant: Mr.T.S. LakshmiFor Respondent: Mr.Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 250(6)Section 37Section 68

house property. The AO held that same expenditure again can't be allowed as deduction against professional receipts. ITA Nos.1535 & 1801/Chny/2024 (AYs 2016-17 & 2015-16) Varadappan Natarajan/ V. Natarajan (Individual) :: 10 :: 7.3.4 During appeal proceedings, appellant claimed that the AO has allowed interest payment for Assessment years 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14, Rs.7,91,581/-, Rs.5

VARADAPPAN NATARAJAN,RASIPURAM vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, SALEM

In the result, both the appeals of assessee in ITA No

ITA 1535/CHNY/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Oct 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1535 & 1801/Chny/2024 ननिाारण वर्ा/Assessment Years: 2016-17 & 2015-16 V. Varadappan Natarajan/ The Acit, V. Natarajan (Individual), Central Circle, No.64-C, Rotary Nagar, Salem. Rasipuram Tamil Nadu-637 408. [Pan: Acgpn1477Q] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Mr.T.S. Lakshmi Venkataraman, Fca (Virtual) प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Respondent By : Mr.Shiva Srinivas, Cit सुनवाईकीतारीख/Date Of Hearing : 09.10.2025 घोर्णाकीतारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.10.2025

For Appellant: Mr.T.S. LakshmiFor Respondent: Mr.Shiva Srinivas, CIT
Section 115BSection 143(3)Section 153ASection 250Section 250(6)Section 37Section 68

house property. The AO held that same expenditure again can't be allowed as deduction against professional receipts. ITA Nos.1535 & 1801/Chny/2024 (AYs 2016-17 & 2015-16) Varadappan Natarajan/ V. Natarajan (Individual) :: 10 :: 7.3.4 During appeal proceedings, appellant claimed that the AO has allowed interest payment for Assessment years 2011-12, 2012-13 and 2013-14, Rs.7,91,581/-, Rs.5

LATE S. YOGARATHINAM, REP. BY L/H Y. SHANMUGA DURAI,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 626/CHNY/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Mar 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:626/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2010-11 Shri Y. Shanmuga Durai, L/H Of Acit Late S.Yogarathinam Vs. Circle -1(2) Old No.24, No.14, Chennai. 17/24, Ramanathan Street, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017. Pan: Aakpy-9845-P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Mr. N. Arjun Raj, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Mr. Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 06.03.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 17.03.2025

For Appellant: Mr. N. Arjun Raj, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. AR.V. Sreenivasan, CIT
Section 122Section 2(47)Section 250Section 45Section 47

house property - Rs.1,34,15,885/- b) Income from other sources (commission) - Rs. 15,000/- c) Income from other sources (agrl) - Rs. 1,50,000/- d) Short term capital gain - Rs.4,74,82,926/- e) Long term capital gain - Rs.6,48,31,420/- 4. In the said order, the AO has observed that the assessee and his brother Shri

MADHURIKA EDUCATIONAL & CHARITABLE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assesse is partly allowed

ITA 641/CHNY/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Oct 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.641/Chny/2024 ननिाारण वर्ा /Assessment Year: 2010-11 Madhurika Educational & Asst. Director Of Income Tax Charitable Trust, Vs. (Exemptions)-Iv, No.11, Millers Road, Kilpauk, Chennai-34 Chennai-600010. [Pan: Aaatm8627M] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri D.Anand, Advocate. प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Respondent By : Ms.Gouthami Manivasagam, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 30.07.2024 घोर्णा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 16.10.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Amitabh Shukla, A.M : This Appeal Is Filed Against The Order Bearing Din & Order No.Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023-24/1059541811(1) Dated 10.01.2024 Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax [Herein After “Cit(A), National Faceless Appeal Center[Nfac], Delhi, For The Assessment Years 2010- 11. Through The Aforesaid Appeal The Assesse Has Challenged Order U/S 250 Dated 10.01.2024 Passed By Nfac, Delhi. :- 2 -:

For Appellant: Shri D.Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms.Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 13Section 13(1)Section 13(1)(c)Section 13(2)(C)Section 13(3)(cc)Section 13(3)(d)Section 164(3)Section 250

section 164(3) of the Income Tax Act and taxed sum of Rs.70,00,000/- considered as excess security deposit at Maximum Marginal Rate. The assessing officer compared the :- 9 -: transactions to a standard rental agreements of Chennai and observed that the common practice in Chennai is only to collect 10 months rent as security deposit and hence restricted

M/S. ANISH KUMAR FEMALE CHILD TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

The appeals of the assessees stand allowed

ITA 2190/CHNY/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Dec 2016AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2177 & 2185/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 & 2013-14

Section 143(1)Section 164(1)

house property and interest income from fixed deposit with Suguna Industries. The CIT(Appeals) by placing reliance on the judgment of Apex Court in CWT v. Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam’s family (Remainder Wealth) Trust (108 ITR 555), found that the Revenue had the option to assess the beneficial interest either in the hands of the trustee in a representative

M/S. ANISH KUMAR EDUCATION TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

The appeals of the assessees stand allowed

ITA 2185/CHNY/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Dec 2016AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2177 & 2185/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 & 2013-14

Section 143(1)Section 164(1)

house property and interest income from fixed deposit with Suguna Industries. The CIT(Appeals) by placing reliance on the judgment of Apex Court in CWT v. Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam’s family (Remainder Wealth) Trust (108 ITR 555), found that the Revenue had the option to assess the beneficial interest either in the hands of the trustee in a representative

M/S. ANISH KUMAR MARRIAGE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

The appeals of the assessees stand allowed

ITA 2188/CHNY/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Dec 2016AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2177 & 2185/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 & 2013-14

Section 143(1)Section 164(1)

house property and interest income from fixed deposit with Suguna Industries. The CIT(Appeals) by placing reliance on the judgment of Apex Court in CWT v. Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam’s family (Remainder Wealth) Trust (108 ITR 555), found that the Revenue had the option to assess the beneficial interest either in the hands of the trustee in a representative

M/S. ANISH KUMAR WIFE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

The appeals of the assessees stand allowed

ITA 2186/CHNY/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Dec 2016AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2177 & 2185/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 & 2013-14

Section 143(1)Section 164(1)

house property and interest income from fixed deposit with Suguna Industries. The CIT(Appeals) by placing reliance on the judgment of Apex Court in CWT v. Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam’s family (Remainder Wealth) Trust (108 ITR 555), found that the Revenue had the option to assess the beneficial interest either in the hands of the trustee in a representative

M/S. ARCHANA MALE CHILD TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

The appeals of the assessees stand allowed

ITA 2180/CHNY/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Dec 2016AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2177 & 2185/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 & 2013-14

Section 143(1)Section 164(1)

house property and interest income from fixed deposit with Suguna Industries. The CIT(Appeals) by placing reliance on the judgment of Apex Court in CWT v. Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam’s family (Remainder Wealth) Trust (108 ITR 555), found that the Revenue had the option to assess the beneficial interest either in the hands of the trustee in a representative

M/S. ANISHKUMAR MALE CHILD TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

The appeals of the assessees stand allowed

ITA 2189/CHNY/2016[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Dec 2016AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2177 & 2185/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 & 2013-14

Section 143(1)Section 164(1)

house property and interest income from fixed deposit with Suguna Industries. The CIT(Appeals) by placing reliance on the judgment of Apex Court in CWT v. Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam’s family (Remainder Wealth) Trust (108 ITR 555), found that the Revenue had the option to assess the beneficial interest either in the hands of the trustee in a representative

M/S. ARCHANA FEMALE CHILD TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

The appeals of the assessees stand allowed

ITA 2179/CHNY/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Dec 2016AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2177 & 2185/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 & 2013-14

Section 143(1)Section 164(1)

house property and interest income from fixed deposit with Suguna Industries. The CIT(Appeals) by placing reliance on the judgment of Apex Court in CWT v. Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam’s family (Remainder Wealth) Trust (108 ITR 555), found that the Revenue had the option to assess the beneficial interest either in the hands of the trustee in a representative

M/S. ANISHKUMAR MALE CHILD TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

The appeals of the assessees stand allowed

ITA 2183/CHNY/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Dec 2016AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2177 & 2185/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 & 2013-14

Section 143(1)Section 164(1)

house property and interest income from fixed deposit with Suguna Industries. The CIT(Appeals) by placing reliance on the judgment of Apex Court in CWT v. Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam’s family (Remainder Wealth) Trust (108 ITR 555), found that the Revenue had the option to assess the beneficial interest either in the hands of the trustee in a representative

M/S. ANISH KUMAR EDUCATION TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

The appeals of the assessees stand allowed

ITA 2177/CHNY/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Dec 2016AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2177 & 2185/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 & 2013-14

Section 143(1)Section 164(1)

house property and interest income from fixed deposit with Suguna Industries. The CIT(Appeals) by placing reliance on the judgment of Apex Court in CWT v. Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam’s family (Remainder Wealth) Trust (108 ITR 555), found that the Revenue had the option to assess the beneficial interest either in the hands of the trustee in a representative

M/S. ANISHKUMAR WIFE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

The appeals of the assessees stand allowed

ITA 2181/CHNY/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Dec 2016AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2177 & 2185/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 & 2013-14

Section 143(1)Section 164(1)

house property and interest income from fixed deposit with Suguna Industries. The CIT(Appeals) by placing reliance on the judgment of Apex Court in CWT v. Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam’s family (Remainder Wealth) Trust (108 ITR 555), found that the Revenue had the option to assess the beneficial interest either in the hands of the trustee in a representative

M/S. ANISH KUMAR FEMALE CHILD TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

The appeals of the assessees stand allowed

ITA 2178/CHNY/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Dec 2016AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2177 & 2185/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 & 2013-14

Section 143(1)Section 164(1)

house property and interest income from fixed deposit with Suguna Industries. The CIT(Appeals) by placing reliance on the judgment of Apex Court in CWT v. Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam’s family (Remainder Wealth) Trust (108 ITR 555), found that the Revenue had the option to assess the beneficial interest either in the hands of the trustee in a representative

M/S. ANISHKUMAR MARRIAGE TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, BANGALORE

The appeals of the assessees stand allowed

ITA 2182/CHNY/2016[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 Dec 2016AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2177 & 2185/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2014-15 & 2013-14

Section 143(1)Section 164(1)

house property and interest income from fixed deposit with Suguna Industries. The CIT(Appeals) by placing reliance on the judgment of Apex Court in CWT v. Trustees of H.E.H. Nizam’s family (Remainder Wealth) Trust (108 ITR 555), found that the Revenue had the option to assess the beneficial interest either in the hands of the trustee in a representative