D.A.V. EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD-4,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee for AY 2014-15,\n2017-18 & 2018-19 are allowed and the appeal for AY 2015-16 is partly\nallowed

5 of the questionnaire issued under\nsection 142(1) of the Act. Further, it is noted that the assessee replied\nthat no assets acquired during the year under consideration in respect of\nquestion No. 7 as details of capital assets acquired. Against question No.\n12 of the questionnaire, vide item No. 10 of its reply, the assessee stated\nthat

THAJUNNISSA BEGUM ,CHENNAI vs. ITO,NON CORPORATE WARD -10(4), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 196/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14 Mrs. Thajunnissa Begum, Income Tax Officer, No. 3, Prasanna Vinayagar V. Non Corporate Ward -10(4), Kovil St., Chennai. 235, Poonamalle High Road, Chennai – 600 029. [Pan: Adcpt-2186-K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. Y. Sridhar, Fca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. D. Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 16.02.2023 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.02.2023

5. The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal: “The order of the Commissioner of Income tax (Appeals)-12 Chennai dated 30/9/2019 is objected to on the following grounds of appeal Exemption under section 54/54F 1.The learned Commissioner (Appeals) erred in granting exemption under section 54 only in respect of one flat in the single building accommodating 13 self

RAMAKRISHNAN PRABHU JYOTHI,,COIMBATORE vs. ACOT, NCC-5, , COIMBATORE

In the result the appeal is dismissed

5 -:\nITA No.690/Chny/2020\n7\nValuation Report submitted (No valuation report\nsubmitted. Only comment submitted by\nValuation officer)\n09.08.2019\n8\nAssessment Order. No opportunity of being\nheard\n14.08.2019\nInterpretation and application of Section 54F\n4.\nThe CIT (Appeals) failed to take note of the fact that as per Section\n54F of the Act the requirement is that the 'assesse shall utilize

SMT. LINGAMMAL RAMARAJU SHASTRA PRATHISHTA TRUST,RAJAPALAYAM vs. ACIT (EXEMPTIONS), COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal stands allowed

5. The sense in which the word \"education\" has been used in section\n2(15) is the instruction, schooling or training given to the young in\npreparation for the work of life. It also connotes the whole course of\nscholastic instruction which a person has received. The word\n\"education\" has not been used in that wide and extended sense

DCIT NON CORPORATE CIRCLE 1, CHENNAI vs. MUTHU DANIEL RAJAN, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1675/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2013-14 Mr.Muthu Daniel Rajan, V. The Asst. Commissioner- No.10, Appar Street, Of Income Tax, Kalakshetra Colony, Non-Corporate Circle-1(1), Besant Nagar, Chennai. Chennai-600 090. [Pan: Aadpd 9713 A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

Section 54F, and had denied the benefit of claim of exemption U/s 54F, amounting to a value of Rs 2,60,54,377/-. 3. The appellant had purchased a residential house at Besant Nagar in the Assessment Year of 2012-13; and to meet out the costs of purchase; had sold his lands at Kunnakkadu in this Assessment Year

DCIT NON CORPORATE CIRCLE 1, CHENNAI vs. MUTHU DANIEL RAJAN, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1675/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2013-14 Mr.Muthu Daniel Rajan, V. The Asst. Commissioner- No.10, Appar Street, Of Income Tax, Kalakshetra Colony, Non-Corporate Circle-1(1), Besant Nagar, Chennai. Chennai-600 090. [Pan: Aadpd 9713 A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

Section 54F, and had denied the benefit of claim of exemption U/s 54F, amounting to a value of Rs 2,60,54,377/-. 3. The appellant had purchased a residential house at Besant Nagar in the Assessment Year of 2012-13; and to meet out the costs of purchase; had sold his lands at Kunnakkadu in this Assessment Year

MUTHU DANIEL RAJAN,CHENNAI vs. CIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA No

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1675/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2013-14 Mr.Muthu Daniel Rajan, V. The Asst. Commissioner- No.10, Appar Street, Of Income Tax, Kalakshetra Colony, Non-Corporate Circle-1(1), Besant Nagar, Chennai. Chennai-600 090. [Pan: Aadpd 9713 A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

Section 54F, and had denied the benefit of claim of exemption U/s 54F, amounting to a value of Rs 2,60,54,377/-. 3. The appellant had purchased a residential house at Besant Nagar in the Assessment Year of 2012-13; and to meet out the costs of purchase; had sold his lands at Kunnakkadu in this Assessment Year

TNCD LLP.,COIMBATORE vs. ITO, NCW-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the quantum appeal of the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.:2602 & 2603/Chny/2025 िनधा#रण वष# / Assessment Year: 2018-19 Tncd Llp, Ito, 126, Kg House, Vs. Non Corporate Ward -1(1), Arts College Road, Coimbatore. Coimbatore – 641 018. [Pan:Aagft-8799-R] (अपीलाथ%/Appellant) (&'थ%/Respondent) अपीलाथ% की ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. N. Arjun Raj, Advocate &'थ% की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. R. Anitha, Addl.C.I.T. सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 20.11.2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 11.02.2026 आदेश /O R D E R

5) of the Act after computing the estimated cost for unsold units of 57 as on 31st March 2018 (Estimated based on booking during 2017-18) at Rs.5,26,51,195/-, notional ALV at 8% on such estimated cost being Rs.42,12,096/-, providing a standard deduction at 30% in arriving at the deemed income from house property at Rs.29

THANUSHKODI NARAYANAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessees in ITA Nos

11 of 1922), or this Act (hereinafter in this section referred to as the undisclosed income or property)”\n\nThus, we find that the books of accounts of M/s.Annai Builders Real Estates Pvt.Ltd, return(s) of income filed for the Assessment Year(s) 2012-13 to 2016-17 were already in possession of the Income Tax Department much prior

M/S AVM CHARITIES,CHENNAI vs. ITO,EXEMPTION WARD, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2012-13 to 2014-15 are allowed and appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble

5. Consequent to survey u/s.133A of the Act, the assessment for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17, have been re-opened u/s.147 of the Act, for reasons ITA Nos.1632 to 1638/Chny/2023 :: 6 :: recorded, as per which, any income chargeable to tax had been escaped assessment on account of under assessment of rental income from letting out of property to M/s.CFD

M/S. A V M CHARITIES,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD-1, CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2012-13 to 2014-15 are allowed and appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble

5. Consequent to survey u/s.133A of the Act, the assessment for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17, have been re-opened u/s.147 of the Act, for reasons ITA Nos.1632 to 1638/Chny/2023 :: 6 :: recorded, as per which, any income chargeable to tax had been escaped assessment on account of under assessment of rental income from letting out of property to M/s.CFD

AVM CHARITIES,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2012-13 to 2014-15 are allowed and appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble

5. Consequent to survey u/s.133A of the Act, the assessment for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17, have been re-opened u/s.147 of the Act, for reasons ITA Nos.1632 to 1638/Chny/2023 :: 6 :: recorded, as per which, any income chargeable to tax had been escaped assessment on account of under assessment of rental income from letting out of property to M/s.CFD

M/S AVM CHARITIES ,CHENNAI vs. ITO,EXEMPTIONS WARD-1, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2012-13 to 2014-15 are allowed and appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble

5. Consequent to survey u/s.133A of the Act, the assessment for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17, have been re-opened u/s.147 of the Act, for reasons ITA Nos.1632 to 1638/Chny/2023 :: 6 :: recorded, as per which, any income chargeable to tax had been escaped assessment on account of under assessment of rental income from letting out of property to M/s.CFD

M/S AVM CHARITIES,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD-1, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2012-13 to 2014-15 are allowed and appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble

5. Consequent to survey u/s.133A of the Act, the assessment for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17, have been re-opened u/s.147 of the Act, for reasons ITA Nos.1632 to 1638/Chny/2023 :: 6 :: recorded, as per which, any income chargeable to tax had been escaped assessment on account of under assessment of rental income from letting out of property to M/s.CFD

AVM CHARITIES,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2012-13 to 2014-15 are allowed and appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble

5. Consequent to survey u/s.133A of the Act, the assessment for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17, have been re-opened u/s.147 of the Act, for reasons ITA Nos.1632 to 1638/Chny/2023 :: 6 :: recorded, as per which, any income chargeable to tax had been escaped assessment on account of under assessment of rental income from letting out of property to M/s.CFD

M/S AVM CHARITIES,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2012-13 to 2014-15 are allowed and appeals filed by the assessee for AYs 2015-16 to 2018-19 are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Ble

5. Consequent to survey u/s.133A of the Act, the assessment for AYs 2012-13 to 2016-17, have been re-opened u/s.147 of the Act, for reasons ITA Nos.1632 to 1638/Chny/2023 :: 6 :: recorded, as per which, any income chargeable to tax had been escaped assessment on account of under assessment of rental income from letting out of property to M/s.CFD

TITAN COMPANY LIMITED,HOSUR vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - LTU 2 (IC), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal raised by the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1742/Chny/2024 निर्धारण वर्ा /Assessment Years: 2011-12 Titan Company Limited, Assistant Commissioner Of No.3, Sipcot Industrial Complex, Income Tax, Hosur, Krishnagiri, Ltu-2, Tamil Nadu-635126 Chennai [Pan: Aaact5131A] (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) : Shri Abhay Kumar, C.A अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Ms.Komali Krishna, Cit प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 10.09.2024 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 04.12.2024

house property • Profits and gains of business and profession • Capital gains • Income from other sources 5.2 The income computed under various heads of income in accordance with the provisions of Chapter IV of the IT Act shall be aggregated in accordance with the provisions of Chapter VI of the IT Act, 1961. This means that first the income/loss from various

THANUSHKODI NARAYANAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(2), CHENNAI

11 of 1922), or this Act (hereinafter in this section\nreferred to as the undisclosed income or property)”\nThus, we find that the books of accounts of M/s.Annai Builders Real Estates\nPvt.Ltd, return(s) of income filed for the Assessment Year(s) 2012-13 to 2016-\n:-24-:\nITA Nos: 2569, 2570, 2571,\n2573 to 2577/Chny/2025\n17 were already