BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “house property”+ Penny Stockclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai141Delhi66Jaipur48Kolkata37Calcutta35Indore23Ahmedabad20Guwahati18Bangalore15Pune14Hyderabad7Chandigarh7Cuttack6Rajkot6Surat4Nagpur3Ranchi3Lucknow3Raipur2Amritsar2Chennai2Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 10(38)3Section 43(5)3Section 682House Property2Penny Stock2Natural Justice2

SAMSON FOUNDATIONS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT NON CORPORATE CIRCLE 5(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2432/CHNY/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Jan 2020AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. G. Ramakrishnan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri.A.Sundararajan, Addl.CIT
Section 234BSection 43(5)Section 73

penny stocks and order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) in considering the same as Speculation Loss are contrary views. (c) Further as per Section 43(5) of The Income Tax Act, 1961 “Speculative transaction” means a transaction in which a contract for the purchase or sale of any commodity, including stocks and shares, is periodically

PRABHA SRISRIMAL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT NON CORPORATE WARD 10(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical

ITA 3513/CHNY/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Sept 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Ble

For Respondent: Mr.P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 10(38)Section 68

house property, income from business, income from capital gains and income from other sources, filed her return of income for the AY 2015-16 on 22.09.2015, declaring total income of Rs.29,31,200/-. The case has been selected for scrutiny and during the course of assessment proceedings, the AO noticed that the assessee has declared long term capital gains