BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

46 results for “disallowance”+ Section 928clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai296Delhi178Bangalore78Ahmedabad75Kolkata62Chennai46Hyderabad37Chandigarh20Jaipur19Pune15Cuttack9Indore8Cochin7Surat7Jodhpur6Visakhapatnam5Guwahati5Panaji4Karnataka3Amritsar3Rajkot3Lucknow2Ranchi2Nagpur2Patna1Punjab & Haryana1Telangana1Raipur1SC1

Key Topics

Section 4037Section 143(3)35Section 14A33Section 14730Disallowance26Section 14824Addition to Income16Deduction16Section 195(2)14Section 153C

IDFC LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT COMPANY CIRCLE II(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA\nNo

ITA 877/CHNY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Sept 2024AY 2010-11
Section 14ASection 36(1)(vi)Section 36(1)(vii)

section 43B relating to loans and\nadvances from a scheduled bank is also not applicable in the instant\ncase. In the above circumstances, in our considered view, neither\nwas the Assessing Officer justified in disallowing the deduction\nclaimed for the provision made in respect of interest accrued but not\ndue on the deep discount bonds issued by the assessee

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI vs. IDFC LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 878/CHNY/2018[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai

Showing 1–20 of 46 · Page 1 of 3

14
Section 69A13
Double Taxation/DTAA9
30 Sept 2024
AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.877/Chny/2018 & 677/Chny/2020 िनधा&रण वष& /Assessment Years: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Farookh V. Irani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 14ASection 36(1)Section 36(1)(vi)Section 36(1)(vii)

section 43B relating to loans and advances from a scheduled bank is also not applicable in the instant ITA No.877, 878/Chny/2018 & 677/Chny/2020 :- 20 -: case. In the above circumstances, in our considered view, neither was the Assessing Officer justified in disallowing the deduction claimed for the provision made in respect of interest accrued but not due on the deep discount bonds

IDFC LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CO. CIRCLE - II (3),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 677/CHNY/2020[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Sept 2024AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.877/Chny/2018 & 677/Chny/2020 िनधा&रण वष& /Assessment Years: 2010-11

For Appellant: Shri Farookh V. Irani, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 14ASection 36(1)Section 36(1)(vi)Section 36(1)(vii)

section 43B relating to loans and advances from a scheduled bank is also not applicable in the instant ITA No.877, 878/Chny/2018 & 677/Chny/2020 :- 20 -: case. In the above circumstances, in our considered view, neither was the Assessing Officer justified in disallowing the deduction claimed for the provision made in respect of interest accrued but not due on the deep discount bonds

KUMARASAMY MARTHANDAN SUBRAMANIAN,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE 3(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is partly-allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 633/CHNY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai10 Apr 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri S.P. Chidambaram, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri A. Sasikumar, CIT
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 69A

section 40A(3) of the Act and disallowance of interest expenses u/s.40(a)(ia) of the Act needs verification. Hence, we set aside the order of the AO and that of the CIT(A) on these two issues and remand these two matters back to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication. 10. Coming to partially confirming

M.ARUNACHALAM AND COMPANY,CHENNAI vs. JCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1352/CHNY/2015[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Apr 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1352 & 1353/Mds/2015 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10 & 2010-11 M/S M. Arunachalam & Company, The Joint / Assistant No.117/79, Lloyds Road, V. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Royapettah, Chennai - 600 014. Business Range Viii, Chennai - 600 006. Pan : Aaafm 6851 F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri J. Chandrasekaran, CAFor Respondent: Sh. P. Radhakrishnan, JCIT

disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act is contrary to the scheme of Income-tax Act. In case the assessee gives credit in the books of account and the amount was not actually paid, then the assessee has to naturally deduct tax and claim the amount as expenditure in mercantile system of accounting. 12 I.T.A. Nos.1352 & 1353/Mds/15

M.ARUNACHALAM AND COMPANY,CHENNAI vs. JCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 1353/CHNY/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Apr 2016AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1352 & 1353/Mds/2015 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2009-10 & 2010-11 M/S M. Arunachalam & Company, The Joint / Assistant No.117/79, Lloyds Road, V. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Royapettah, Chennai - 600 014. Business Range Viii, Chennai - 600 006. Pan : Aaafm 6851 F (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri J. Chandrasekaran, CAFor Respondent: Sh. P. Radhakrishnan, JCIT

disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act is contrary to the scheme of Income-tax Act. In case the assessee gives credit in the books of account and the amount was not actually paid, then the assessee has to naturally deduct tax and claim the amount as expenditure in mercantile system of accounting. 12 I.T.A. Nos.1352 & 1353/Mds/15

TAMIL NADU WATER INVESTMENT COMPANY LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 696/CHNY/2017[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 May 2022AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.694/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Tamil Nadu Water Investment Co. Ltd., 1St Floor, Poly Hose Towers, Income Tax, Corporate Circle 3(1), New Block, 4Th Floor, 121, Mahatma No. 86, Mount Road, Guindy, Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 32. Chennai 600 034. [Pan: Aabct8153B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.696/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Tamil Nadu Water Investment Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Co. Ltd., 1St Floor, Poly Hose Towers, Income Tax, Corporate Circle 3(1), No. 86, Mount Road, Guindy, Chennai 600 034. Chennai – 32. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) Department By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit Assessee By : Shri R. Viswanathan, C.A. सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 18.04.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 06.05.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: Both The Cross Appeals Filed By The Revenue & The Assessee Are Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)13, Chennai Dated 27.12.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2

For Appellant: Shri R. Viswanathan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 14A

928, 929 & 941 of 2015, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has observed and held as under: “6. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed before this court. 7. In order to appreciate the submissions made on both sides, it is but necessary to refer to the relevant provisions of law, viz., Section 43 and Explanation 3C, which

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. TAMIL NADU WATER INVESTMENT CO. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 694/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.694/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Tamil Nadu Water Investment Co. Ltd., 1St Floor, Poly Hose Towers, Income Tax, Corporate Circle 3(1), New Block, 4Th Floor, 121, Mahatma No. 86, Mount Road, Guindy, Gandhi Road, Nungambakkam, Chennai – 32. Chennai 600 034. [Pan: Aabct8153B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.696/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Tamil Nadu Water Investment Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Co. Ltd., 1St Floor, Poly Hose Towers, Income Tax, Corporate Circle 3(1), No. 86, Mount Road, Guindy, Chennai 600 034. Chennai – 32. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) Department By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit Assessee By : Shri R. Viswanathan, C.A. सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 18.04.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 06.05.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: Both The Cross Appeals Filed By The Revenue & The Assessee Are Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)13, Chennai Dated 27.12.2016 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2

For Appellant: Shri R. Viswanathan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 14A

928, 929 & 941 of 2015, wherein, the Hon’ble High Court has observed and held as under: “6. Heard both sides and perused the materials placed before this court. 7. In order to appreciate the submissions made on both sides, it is but necessary to refer to the relevant provisions of law, viz., Section 43 and Explanation 3C, which

RECKITT BENCKISER SCHOLL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KANCHEEPURAM vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 756/CHNY/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Feb 2017AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.756/Mds/2016 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2011-12 M/S. Reckitt Benckiser Scholl The Deputy Commissioner Of India Private Limited V. Income Tax, (Formerly Known As M/S. Corporate Circle – V (1), Reckitt Benekiser Scholl India Chennai Limited). Plot F 73/74, Sipcot Industrial Park, Irungattukottai, Sriperumbudur, Kancheepuram – 602 117

For Appellant: Shri S.P. Chidambaram, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Milind Madhukar Bhusari, CIT
Section 10BSection 143(3)

disallowance under Section 14A of the Act and the DRP has rejected. vii) The assessee objected for excluding of income, interest dividend, provision for foreign exchange, etc., for deduction u/s.10B which was rejected by the DRP and upheld the order of the TPO. Consequent to the DRP order, the Assessing Officer passed the assessment order under Section 143(3) r.w.s

LIFECELL INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 3334/CHNY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai04 Jan 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 3334/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/S. Lifecell International Assistant Commissioner Of Private Ltd., V. Income Tax, No. 26, Vandalur Corporate Circle 4(1), Kelambakkam Main Road, Chennai. Keelakkottaiyur, Chennai. [Pan: Aaeca-7997-B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. Ajith Kumar Choradia, Ca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. S. Senthil Kumaran, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 23.11.2022 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 04.01.2023 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. Ajith Kumar Choradia, CAFor Respondent: Shri. S. Senthil Kumaran, CIT

Section 35(1)(iv) of the Act d. Pass such other orders it may deem fit.” 3. The brief facts of the case are that, the appellant M/s. Life Cell International Private Ltd is engaged in the business of processing, preservation and storage of stem cells obtained from umbilical cord, menstrual blood. The appellant company had filed its return

NATIONAL AGRO FOODS,TIRUPPUR vs. ITO, TIRUPPUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 2554/CHNY/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Apr 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2554/Mds/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 M/S National Agro Foods, The Income Tax Officer, 141, Mangalam Road, Avinashi, V. Ward – I(2), Tirupur – 641 654. Tirupur. Pan : Aahfn 1444 L (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G. Baskar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. B. Nischal, JCIT
Section 69C

disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act is contrary to the scheme of Income-tax Act. In case the assessee gives credit in the books of account and the amount was not actually paid, then the assessee has to naturally deduct tax and claim the amount as expenditure in mercantile system of accounting. 10. We have carefully gone

DCIT , CORPORATE RANGE - 1 (1), CHENNAI vs. M/S ASPIRE SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED , CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment

ITA 315/CHNY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Dec 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1069, 1070 & 1071/Chny/2022, 159 & 315/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2017-18, 2016-17, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Dcit/Jcit(Osd), M/S. Aspire Systems India Corporate Circle -1(1), V. Private Limited, Chennai – 600 034. Old No. 4, New No. 7, Ii Trust Link Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai – 600 028. [Pan: Aacca-4543-M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 39 & 40/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14

For Appellant: Ms. Jharna B. Harilal, FCA
Section 195Section 195(2)Section 197Section 37Section 40Section 9(1)(vii)Section 9(2)

disallowing a sum of Rs. 28,93,928 towards provision made for expenses on accrual basis for professional charges under section

JCIT(OSD),CORPORATE CIRCLE-1(10, CHENNAI vs. ASPIRE SYSTEMS INDIALTD., CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment

ITA 159/CHNY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Dec 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1069, 1070 & 1071/Chny/2022, 159 & 315/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2017-18, 2016-17, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Dcit/Jcit(Osd), M/S. Aspire Systems India Corporate Circle -1(1), V. Private Limited, Chennai – 600 034. Old No. 4, New No. 7, Ii Trust Link Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai – 600 028. [Pan: Aacca-4543-M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 39 & 40/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14

For Appellant: Ms. Jharna B. Harilal, FCA
Section 195Section 195(2)Section 197Section 37Section 40Section 9(1)(vii)Section 9(2)

disallowing a sum of Rs. 28,93,928 towards provision made for expenses on accrual basis for professional charges under section

DCIT , CORPORATE CIRCLE - 1 (1), CHENNAI vs. M/S ASPIRE SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED , CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment

ITA 1069/CHNY/2022[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Dec 2023AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1069, 1070 & 1071/Chny/2022, 159 & 315/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2017-18, 2016-17, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Dcit/Jcit(Osd), M/S. Aspire Systems India Corporate Circle -1(1), V. Private Limited, Chennai – 600 034. Old No. 4, New No. 7, Ii Trust Link Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai – 600 028. [Pan: Aacca-4543-M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 39 & 40/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14

For Appellant: Ms. Jharna B. Harilal, FCA
Section 195Section 195(2)Section 197Section 37Section 40Section 9(1)(vii)Section 9(2)

disallowing a sum of Rs. 28,93,928 towards provision made for expenses on accrual basis for professional charges under section

DCIT , CORPORATE CIRCLE - 1 (1), CHENNAI vs. M/S ASPIRE SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED , CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment

ITA 1071/CHNY/2022[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Dec 2023AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1069, 1070 & 1071/Chny/2022, 159 & 315/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2017-18, 2016-17, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Dcit/Jcit(Osd), M/S. Aspire Systems India Corporate Circle -1(1), V. Private Limited, Chennai – 600 034. Old No. 4, New No. 7, Ii Trust Link Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai – 600 028. [Pan: Aacca-4543-M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 39 & 40/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14

For Appellant: Ms. Jharna B. Harilal, FCA
Section 195Section 195(2)Section 197Section 37Section 40Section 9(1)(vii)Section 9(2)

disallowing a sum of Rs. 28,93,928 towards provision made for expenses on accrual basis for professional charges under section

M/S ASPIRE SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,CHENNAI vs. DCIT , CORPORATE RANGE - 1 (1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment

ITA 40/CHNY/2023[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Dec 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1069, 1070 & 1071/Chny/2022, 159 & 315/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2017-18, 2016-17, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Dcit/Jcit(Osd), M/S. Aspire Systems India Corporate Circle -1(1), V. Private Limited, Chennai – 600 034. Old No. 4, New No. 7, Ii Trust Link Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai – 600 028. [Pan: Aacca-4543-M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 39 & 40/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14

For Appellant: Ms. Jharna B. Harilal, FCA
Section 195Section 195(2)Section 197Section 37Section 40Section 9(1)(vii)Section 9(2)

disallowing a sum of Rs. 28,93,928 towards provision made for expenses on accrual basis for professional charges under section

DCIT , CORPORATE CIRCLE - 1 (1), CHENNAI vs. M/S ASPIRE SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED , CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment

ITA 1070/CHNY/2022[2017-2018]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Dec 2023AY 2017-2018

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1069, 1070 & 1071/Chny/2022, 159 & 315/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2017-18, 2016-17, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Dcit/Jcit(Osd), M/S. Aspire Systems India Corporate Circle -1(1), V. Private Limited, Chennai – 600 034. Old No. 4, New No. 7, Ii Trust Link Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai – 600 028. [Pan: Aacca-4543-M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 39 & 40/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14

For Appellant: Ms. Jharna B. Harilal, FCA
Section 195Section 195(2)Section 197Section 37Section 40Section 9(1)(vii)Section 9(2)

disallowing a sum of Rs. 28,93,928 towards provision made for expenses on accrual basis for professional charges under section

M/S ASPIRE SYSTEMS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED ,CHENNAI vs. DCIT , CORPORATE RANGE - 1 (1), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue for assessment

ITA 39/CHNY/2023[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Dec 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 1069, 1070 & 1071/Chny/2022, 159 & 315/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2010-11, 2017-18, 2016-17, 2012-13 & 2013-14 Dcit/Jcit(Osd), M/S. Aspire Systems India Corporate Circle -1(1), V. Private Limited, Chennai – 600 034. Old No. 4, New No. 7, Ii Trust Link Road, Raja Annamalaipuram, Chennai – 600 028. [Pan: Aacca-4543-M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 39 & 40/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2012-13 & 2013-14

For Appellant: Ms. Jharna B. Harilal, FCA
Section 195Section 195(2)Section 197Section 37Section 40Section 9(1)(vii)Section 9(2)

disallowing a sum of Rs. 28,93,928 towards provision made for expenses on accrual basis for professional charges under section

ITO, CHENNAI vs. XERAGO CRM SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed

ITA 1543/CHNY/2015[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2015AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1543/Mds/2015 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 The Income Tax Officer, M/S Xerago Crm Solutions Pvt. Ltd., New No.3, 17Th Avenue, Corporate Ward – 3(3), V. Chennai - 600 034. Harrington Road, Chetpet, Chennai - 600 031. Pan : Aaacx 0348 K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri A.V. Sreekanth, JCITFor Respondent: Shri R. Badreenath, CA
Section 40

Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act clearly provides for disallowance of amount paid by the assessee if tax was not deducted as required under the scheme of Income-tax Act. The point for deduction of tax is at the time when the payment was made or the amount is credited in the books of accounts. Therefore, the scheme

ITO, CHENNAI vs. D.UMAPATHY, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is allowed

ITA 2435/CHNY/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Aug 2015AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2435/Mds/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09

For Appellant: Shri S. Dasgupta, JCITFor Respondent: Shri K. Balasubramanian
Section 40

disallowance under Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act. According to the Ld. D.R., tax has to be deducted on the amount paid by the assessee and not only the amount payable by the assessee. 3. On the contrary, Shri K. Balasubramanian, the Ld.counsel for the assessee, submitted that this Tribunal by interpreting Section