INTEGRATED SERVICE POINT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), CHENNAI

Accordingly, the assessee's appeals in ITA Nos.1881, 1882,\nand 1883/Chny/2025 for A.Ys.2016-17, 2019-20, and 2022-23 are\nallowed

disallowance: Rs.3,02,02,100/-\nb. Alleged bogus purchases: Rs.4,43,24,430/-\nc. Unexplained money under section 69A: Rs.39,22,000/- on account of\namounts received from Shri B.S. Prasad\nd. Unexplained expenditure under section 69C

ACIT, NUNAGAMBAKKAM vs. INTEGRATED SERVICE POINT LIMITED, ANNA NAGAR

disallowance: Rs.3,02,02,100/-\nb. Alleged bogus purchases: Rs.4,43,24,430/-\nc. Unexplained money under section 69A: Rs.39,22,000/- on account of\namounts received from Shri B.S. Prasad\nd. Unexplained expenditure under section 69C

INTEGRATED SERVICE POINT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-2(4), CHENNAI

Accordingly, the assessee's appeals in ITA Nos.1881, 1882,\nand 1883/Chny/2025 for A.Ys.2016-17, 2019-20, and 2022-23 are\nallowed

disallowance: Rs.3,02,02,100/-\nb. Alleged bogus purchases: Rs.4,43,24,430/-\nc. Unexplained money under section 69A: Rs.39,22,000/- on account of\namounts received from Shri B.S. Prasad\nd. Unexplained expenditure under section 69C

ACIT, NUNGAMBAKKAM vs. INTEGRATED SERVICE POINT LIMITED, ANNA NAGAR

Accordingly, the assessee's appeals in ITA Nos.1881, 1882,\nand 1883/Chny/2025 for A.Ys.2016-17, 2019-20, and 2022-23 are\nallowed

disallowance: Rs.3,02,02,100/-\nb. Alleged bogus purchases: Rs.4,43,24,430/-\nc. Unexplained money under section 69A: Rs.39,22,000/- on account of\namounts received from Shri B.S. Prasad\nd. Unexplained expenditure under section 69C

INCOMETAX OFFICER, THRIUVALLUR vs. GT60 ARUNGULAM PRIMARY AGRI COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY, TIRUTTANI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.2781/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 The Income Tax Officer, Vs. Gt60 Arungulam Primary Agri Ward 1, Cooperative Credit Society, Tiruvallur. No. 1, Periya Theru, Thumbikulam Village, Thalavedu Post & Taluk, Tiruvallur 631 212. [Pan: Aabag2568F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. R. Anita, Addl. Cit ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Malar Mannan, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 02.06.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 17.07.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Revenue Is Directed Against The Order Dated 26.07.2024 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi For The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. We Find That This Appeal Is Filed With A Delay Of 24 Days. The Ito, Ward 1, Tiruvallur Filed An Affidavit For Condonation Of Delay Stating The Reasons. Upon Hearing Both The Parties & On Examination Of The Said

section 69C of the Act. Before the ld. CIT(A), it was contended that there was no claim of expenditure and the question of disallowance

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. JAGATHRAKSHAKAN SRINISHA, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in I

disallow the claim of gift. The Ld.CIT(A) had reasoned out that\nthe assessee's brother had given a letter stating the fact of the gift and that stands as\nan evidence to show that gifts are indeed made. In our view, this is acceptable. At any\nrate, we find that the AO never brought out any material to disprove

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. JAGATHRAKSHAKAN SRINISHA, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by the Revenue in I

disallow the claim of gift. The Ld.CIT(A) had reasoned out that\nthe assessee's brother had given a letter stating the fact of the gift and that stands as\nan evidence to show that gifts are indeed made. In our view, this is acceptable. At any\nrate, we find that the AO never brought out any material to disprove

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. JAGATHRAKSKAN SRINISHA, CHENNAI

disallow the claim of gift. The Ld.CIT(A) had reasoned out that\nthe assessee's brother had given a letter stating the fact of the gift and that stands as\nan evidence to show that gifts are indeed made. In our view, this is acceptable. At any\nrate, we find that the AO never brought out any material to disprove

SUMERMAL KANTILAL JAIN,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by both the assessees in ITA

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1011/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22 Gautham Chand Jain, Assistant Commissioner Of No. 13, 3Rd Street, V. Income Tax, Balgota Villa, Central Circle 1(1), Sambier Street, Gandhi Salai, Chennai -600 034. Seven Wells, Sowcarpet, Chennai – 600 001. [Pan: Aahpg-0295-J] आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1012/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22 Sumermal Kantilal Jain, Assistant Commissioner Of 104/A6, Govindappa Naicken V. Income Tax, Street, George Town, Central Circle 1(1), Chennai – 600 001. Chennai -600 034. [Pan: Aaopj-1866-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Dr. Ca. Abhishek Murali, Fca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 17.04.2023 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 19.04.2023

disallowing the same. (iii) The Learned AO/CIT(A) has not provided any opportunity and has merely made the addition without issuing a show-cause notice or a 2° hearing, (iv) The Learned CIT(A) has also failed to adjudicate grounds raised in the Appeal. Cash already Recorded in Books - Addition_uls 69A Bad In Law: (v) Without Prejudice

GAUTHAM CHAND JAIN,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by both the assessees in ITA

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Dr. Manish Borad, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1011/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22 Gautham Chand Jain, Assistant Commissioner Of No. 13, 3Rd Street, V. Income Tax, Balgota Villa, Central Circle 1(1), Sambier Street, Gandhi Salai, Chennai -600 034. Seven Wells, Sowcarpet, Chennai – 600 001. [Pan: Aahpg-0295-J] आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1012/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22 Sumermal Kantilal Jain, Assistant Commissioner Of 104/A6, Govindappa Naicken V. Income Tax, Street, George Town, Central Circle 1(1), Chennai – 600 001. Chennai -600 034. [Pan: Aaopj-1866-H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Dr. Ca. Abhishek Murali, Fca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 17.04.2023 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 19.04.2023

disallowing the same. (iii) The Learned AO/CIT(A) has not provided any opportunity and has merely made the addition without issuing a show-cause notice or a 2° hearing, (iv) The Learned CIT(A) has also failed to adjudicate grounds raised in the Appeal. Cash already Recorded in Books - Addition_uls 69A Bad In Law: (v) Without Prejudice

PHOTON KATHAAS PRODUCTION PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CC-3(3),, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1642/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19 Deputy Commissioner Of Photon Kathaas Production V. Income-Tax, Private Limited, Central Circle -3(3), No.19, Avenue Road, Chennai. Nungambakkam, Chennai – 600 034. [Pan: Aafcp-2805-A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. Raghav Rajeev Menon, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Dr. Samuel Pitta, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 25.09.2024 आदेश /O R D E R Per S. R. Raghunatha:

disallowance of Rs.22,84,069/- made under section 69C of the Act. 3. The Learned CIT(Appeals) Ought to have

JEPPIAR EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for all four assessment years are allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 480, 481, 482 & 483/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21 Jeppiaar Educational Trust, The Deputy/Assistant 29A, Ganapathy Street, V. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Royapettah, Central Circle -1(3), Chennai – 600 014. Chennai. [Pan: Aaatj-0562-E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. B. Ramakrishnan, Fca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.07.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23.08.2023

69C of Rs.82,34,693/- (AY 2017-18); Rs.2,66,20,836/- (AY 2018-19); Rs.1,74,74,677/- (AY 2019-20) and Rs.57,86,895/- (AY 202021) respectively. d. The trustee Smt.Regeena Jeppiaar merely claimed that the inflated salary received back from employees in cash was utilized for the purpose of meeting day-to-day expenses of the trust

JEPPIAR EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for all four assessment years are allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 480, 481, 482 & 483/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21 Jeppiaar Educational Trust, The Deputy/Assistant 29A, Ganapathy Street, V. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Royapettah, Central Circle -1(3), Chennai – 600 014. Chennai. [Pan: Aaatj-0562-E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. B. Ramakrishnan, Fca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.07.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23.08.2023

69C of Rs.82,34,693/- (AY 2017-18); Rs.2,66,20,836/- (AY 2018-19); Rs.1,74,74,677/- (AY 2019-20) and Rs.57,86,895/- (AY 202021) respectively. d. The trustee Smt.Regeena Jeppiaar merely claimed that the inflated salary received back from employees in cash was utilized for the purpose of meeting day-to-day expenses of the trust

JEPPIAR EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for all four assessment years are allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 480, 481, 482 & 483/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21 Jeppiaar Educational Trust, The Deputy/Assistant 29A, Ganapathy Street, V. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Royapettah, Central Circle -1(3), Chennai – 600 014. Chennai. [Pan: Aaatj-0562-E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. B. Ramakrishnan, Fca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.07.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23.08.2023

69C of Rs.82,34,693/- (AY 2017-18); Rs.2,66,20,836/- (AY 2018-19); Rs.1,74,74,677/- (AY 2019-20) and Rs.57,86,895/- (AY 202021) respectively. d. The trustee Smt.Regeena Jeppiaar merely claimed that the inflated salary received back from employees in cash was utilized for the purpose of meeting day-to-day expenses of the trust

JEPPIAR EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1(3), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for all four assessment years are allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 480, 481, 482 & 483/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2017-18, 2018-19, 2019-20 & 2020-21 Jeppiaar Educational Trust, The Deputy/Assistant 29A, Ganapathy Street, V. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Royapettah, Central Circle -1(3), Chennai – 600 014. Chennai. [Pan: Aaatj-0562-E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. B. Ramakrishnan, Fca ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.07.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 23.08.2023

69C of Rs.82,34,693/- (AY 2017-18); Rs.2,66,20,836/- (AY 2018-19); Rs.1,74,74,677/- (AY 2019-20) and Rs.57,86,895/- (AY 202021) respectively. d. The trustee Smt.Regeena Jeppiaar merely claimed that the inflated salary received back from employees in cash was utilized for the purpose of meeting day-to-day expenses of the trust

CRAFTSMAN AUTOMATION LTD.,COIMBATORE vs. ACIT,CC-2, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.177/Chny/2021 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 Craftsman Automation Ltd., Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of ‘Senthel Towers’, 4Th Floor, Income Tax, 1078, Avinashi Road, Corporate Circle 2, Coimbatore 641 018. Coimbatore 641 018. [Pan:Aabcc2461K] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri R. Vijayaragahavan, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri M. Rajan, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 08.03.2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24.03.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Coimbatore, Dated 30.03.2021 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2015-16 Passed Under Section 263 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short].

disallowance. The Assessing Officer failed to examine the point mentioned above rendering the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue. 4 Further, in Note 10-Tangible and Intangible assets to the Balance sheet as on 31.03.2015, the addition towards freehold land during the previous year 2014-15 relevant to A.Y.2015-16 was exhibited at Rs.5

DAR E IMAAN WELFARE AND EDUCATIONAL TRUST,VELLORE vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri M. Balaganesh & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Raviआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.2259/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20 Dar E Imaan Welfare & Educational Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Trust, No. 434/1, G. Kayide Millath Exemption Ward, Nagar, Kathiyavadi, Melvisharam, Chennai. Vellore 632 509. [Pan: Aactd2327B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : None ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri C.P. Solomon, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 22.10.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 28.10.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 11.07.2025 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi For The Assessment Year 2019-20. 2. When The Appeal Was Taken Up For Hearing, None Appeared On Behalf Of The Assessee Nor Filed Any Adjournment Petition. Hence We

disallowance of claim of deduction and treating the same as unexplained expenditure under section 69C of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short

ARIHANT RETAIL PVT. LTD.,,CHENNAI vs. PCIT-1,, CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1308/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19 Arihant Retail Private Limited, Principal Commissioner Of 29, Namachivaya Chetty Street, V. Income Tax -1, Old Washermanpet, Chennai – 600 034. Chennai – 600 021. [Pan: Aaics-3648-F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : Shri. T. Banusekar, Advocate अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 07.08.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09.10.2024

69C of-the IT Act and the same is added back to the total income of the assessee under the head "Income from other sources". Penalty u/s 271AAC(1) is being initiated for under-reporting of income. Tax shall be calculated according to section 115BBE of the Income Tax Act, 1961. 6. Disallowances