BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “disallowance”+ Section 272A(2)(e)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai48Bangalore26Delhi23Ahmedabad13Pune10Chandigarh10Chennai9Cuttack8Jaipur7Lucknow6Panaji5Kolkata4Surat4Raipur3Rajkot3Indore2Patna2Hyderabad2Nagpur2Agra2Visakhapatnam1Dehradun1Jabalpur1Jodhpur1SC1

Key Topics

Section 40A(3)10Section 80P9Section 408Penalty8Disallowance8Deduction5Addition to Income4Section 270A3Section 272(1)(d)3Section 144

P.SENTHIL KUMAR,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 3397/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Feb 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.3397 & 3398/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2012-13. Shri. P. Senthil Kumar, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, P-2, Hig Adyar Apartments, Non Corporate Ward 3(3) Kottur Gardens, Chennai. Circular Road, Kotturpuram, Chennai 600 086. [Pan Abbps 1019H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Durai Pandian, Sr. A.R
Section 271BSection 40A(3)

E R PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against orders dated 20.10.2016 of ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-4, Chennai for the impugned assessment year. ITA Nos.3397 & 3398/Mds/16 :- 2 -: 2. First appeal is against disallowance of "38,44,069/- u/s.40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short

3
Section 142(1)3
Section 683

P.SENTHIL KUMAR,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal of the assessee in ITA

ITA 3398/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Feb 2017AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.3397 & 3398/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2012-13. Shri. P. Senthil Kumar, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, P-2, Hig Adyar Apartments, Non Corporate Ward 3(3) Kottur Gardens, Chennai. Circular Road, Kotturpuram, Chennai 600 086. [Pan Abbps 1019H] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri. T. Vasudevan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. Durai Pandian, Sr. A.R
Section 271BSection 40A(3)

E R PER ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER These appeals filed by the assessee are directed against orders dated 20.10.2016 of ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-4, Chennai for the impugned assessment year. ITA Nos.3397 & 3398/Mds/16 :- 2 -: 2. First appeal is against disallowance of "38,44,069/- u/s.40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short

ACIT, NAGERCOIL vs. M/S. VILAVANCODE SELF RELIANCE CREDIT SERVICES LTD., NAGERCOIL

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 2651/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Feb 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri M. Balaganeshआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2651/Mds/2016 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2012-13

For Appellant: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCITFor Respondent: Sh. A.S. Sriraman, Advocate
Section 194ASection 272A(2)(f)Section 40

E R PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal of the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -3, Madurai, dated 13.06.2016 and pertains to assessment year 2012-13 deleting the disallowance made by the Assessing Officer. 2 I.T.A. No.2651/Mds/16 2. Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, the Ld. Departmental Representative, submitted that the assessee

ACIT, NAGERCOIL vs. M/S. KRISHNAVAKA BENEFIT FUND LTD., NAGERCOIL

In the result, both the appeal filed by the Revenue and the cross-objection filed by the assessee stand dismissed

ITA 2653/CHNY/2016[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Feb 2018AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri M. Balaganesh

For Appellant: Shri AR.V. Sreenivasan, JCITFor Respondent: Shri N. Subramonian, CA
Section 194Section 272A(2)(f)Section 40

E R PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal of the Revenue is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) -3, Madurai, dated 13.06.2016 and pertains to assessment year 2012-13 deleting the 2 I.T.A. No.2653/Mds/16 C.O. No.176/Mds/17 disallowance made by the Assessing Officer. The assessee has filed cross-objection in respect of the same order

AA 293 PANAHALLI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ERODE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 2(1), ERODE

In the result, the appeals filed in ITA Nos

ITA 2021/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.2020, 2021 & 2022/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21 Aa 293 Panahalli Primary Agricultural Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Cooperative Credit Society Limited, Ward 2(1), 1, Panakkahally, Thalavady Post, Erode. Erode 638 461. [Pan: Aacaa1566A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. A. Vijayalakshmi, C.A. (Virtual) ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 30.10.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 11.11.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per Bench: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders All Dated 27.06.2025 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi For The Assessment Year 2020-21 Towards Disallowance Of Deduction Claimed Under Section 80P Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short], Levy Of Penalty Under Section 270A Of The Act & Levy Of Penalty Under Section 272(1)(D) Of The Act By Rejecting The Prayer Of Condonation Of Delay In Filing The Appeals Before The Ld. Cit(A).

For Appellant: Ms. A. Vijayalakshmi, C.A. (Virtual)For Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 144Section 270ASection 272(1)(d)Section 80P

disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80P of the Act for the reason that the assessee did not furnish any explanation/documentary evidence in support of deduction claimed at ₹.27,88,155/- under section 80P of the Act. The ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee since the assessee failed to explain the sufficient cause in filing the appeal

AA 293 PANAHALLI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ERODE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), ERODE

In the result, the appeals filed in ITA Nos

ITA 2020/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.2020, 2021 & 2022/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21 Aa 293 Panahalli Primary Agricultural Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Cooperative Credit Society Limited, Ward 2(1), 1, Panakkahally, Thalavady Post, Erode. Erode 638 461. [Pan: Aacaa1566A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. A. Vijayalakshmi, C.A. (Virtual) ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 30.10.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 11.11.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per Bench: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders All Dated 27.06.2025 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi For The Assessment Year 2020-21 Towards Disallowance Of Deduction Claimed Under Section 80P Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short], Levy Of Penalty Under Section 270A Of The Act & Levy Of Penalty Under Section 272(1)(D) Of The Act By Rejecting The Prayer Of Condonation Of Delay In Filing The Appeals Before The Ld. Cit(A).

For Appellant: Ms. A. Vijayalakshmi, C.A. (Virtual)For Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 144Section 270ASection 272(1)(d)Section 80P

disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80P of the Act for the reason that the assessee did not furnish any explanation/documentary evidence in support of deduction claimed at ₹.27,88,155/- under section 80P of the Act. The ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee since the assessee failed to explain the sufficient cause in filing the appeal

AA 293 PANAHALLI PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,ERODE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), ERODE

In the result, the appeals filed in ITA Nos

ITA 2022/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.2020, 2021 & 2022/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21 Aa 293 Panahalli Primary Agricultural Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Cooperative Credit Society Limited, Ward 2(1), 1, Panakkahally, Thalavady Post, Erode. Erode 638 461. [Pan: Aacaa1566A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. A. Vijayalakshmi, C.A. (Virtual) ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 30.10.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 11.11.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per Bench: These Three Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders All Dated 27.06.2025 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi For The Assessment Year 2020-21 Towards Disallowance Of Deduction Claimed Under Section 80P Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short], Levy Of Penalty Under Section 270A Of The Act & Levy Of Penalty Under Section 272(1)(D) Of The Act By Rejecting The Prayer Of Condonation Of Delay In Filing The Appeals Before The Ld. Cit(A).

For Appellant: Ms. A. Vijayalakshmi, C.A. (Virtual)For Respondent: Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT
Section 144Section 270ASection 272(1)(d)Section 80P

disallowance of deduction claimed under section 80P of the Act for the reason that the assessee did not furnish any explanation/documentary evidence in support of deduction claimed at ₹.27,88,155/- under section 80P of the Act. The ld. CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee since the assessee failed to explain the sufficient cause in filing the appeal

MAHALINGAM SUNDARA MOORTHY,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CORPORATE WARD-4(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1682/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai02 Sept 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1682/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 Mahalingam Sundara Moorthy, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 602, Srithi Block, Chitra Avenue, Corporate Ward 4(1), Nungambakkam, Chennai 600 034. Chennai. [Pan:Afypm5382G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : None ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri N. Rajakumar, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 26.08.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 02.09.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi:

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri N. Rajakumar, Addl. CIT
Section 131Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 250Section 272A(1)(d)Section 274Section 68

E R PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER: This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 26.05.2025 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi for the assessment year 2017-18. 2. None appeared on behalf of the assessee and hence, we proceed to dispose the appeal on merits

SAI TELECOM,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 3(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 2534/CHNY/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Sept 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manjunatha. Gआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2534/Chny/2017 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Year: 2012-13 M/S. Sai Telecom, The Income Tax Officer, No.407, 4Th Floor, Kaveri Complex, Vs. Non Corporate Ward-3(3), Nungambakkam, Chennai. Chennai – 600 034. [Pan: Abrfs-4178-F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri N. Arjun Raj, C.A ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri Arv Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 24.07.2023 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 15.09.2023

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjun Raj, C.A ""For Respondent: Shri ARV Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 139Section 143(3)Section 68

E R Per Mahavir Singh, Vice President : This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-4, Chennai [hereinafter “CIT(A)”] in ITA No.63/2015-16/A.Y.2012-13/CIT(A)-4 dated 18.09.2017. The Assessment was framed by Income Tax Officer, Non Corporate Ward-3(3), Chennai for the relevant A.Y. 2012-13 vide order dated