BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “disallowance”+ Section 268Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi40Mumbai27Bangalore9Ahmedabad7Kolkata7Chennai6Karnataka6Jaipur2Indore2Lucknow1Chandigarh1Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 14A12Disallowance6Section 364Section 56(2)(viia)4Section 143(3)4Section 564Section 36(1)4Section 354Addition to Income4Section 14A(2)

ACIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 2, MADURAI vs. TVS LOGISTICS SERVICES LTD., MADURAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is treated as

ITA 1927/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri G.Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.2906/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Tvs Logistics Services Ltd. Income Tax, 10, Jawahar Road, Chokkikulam, Corporate Circle-2 Madurai-625 002. Madurai. Pan: Aacct 1412E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.1927/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Vs M/S. Tvs Logistics Services The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ltd. Corporate Circle-2 10,Jawahar Road, Madurai. Chokkikulam, Madurai-625 002. Pan: Aacct 1412E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.G.Johnson, Addl.CIT
Section 14ASection 14A(2)

disallowances computed u/s.14A of the Act to the extent of exempt income by following decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court of Madras in TCA No.520 of 2016 dated 23.12.2016 in the case of M/s. Redington India Ltd. Vs. Addl. CIT, therefore, there is no merit in the arguments investments in overseas subsidiaries. However, he fairly agreed that issue

2
Condonation of Delay2
Natural Justice2

T vs. LOGISTICS SERVICES LIMITED,MADURAIVS.DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 2, MADURAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is treated as

ITA 2906/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Vice- & Shri G.Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.2906/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Vs The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Tvs Logistics Services Ltd. Income Tax, 10, Jawahar Road, Chokkikulam, Corporate Circle-2 Madurai-625 002. Madurai. Pan: Aacct 1412E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) & आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.1927/Chny/2018 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Vs M/S. Tvs Logistics Services The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Ltd. Corporate Circle-2 10,Jawahar Road, Madurai. Chokkikulam, Madurai-625 002. Pan: Aacct 1412E (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr.G.Johnson, Addl.CIT
Section 14ASection 14A(2)

disallowances computed u/s.14A of the Act to the extent of exempt income by following decision of the Hon'ble Jurisdictional High Court of Madras in TCA No.520 of 2016 dated 23.12.2016 in the case of M/s. Redington India Ltd. Vs. Addl. CIT, therefore, there is no merit in the arguments investments in overseas subsidiaries. However, he fairly agreed that issue

DCIT NON CORPORATE CIRCLE I, CHENNAI vs. JAIN HOUSING, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

ITA 337/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Aug 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. R. Clement RameshFor Respondent: Shri. M. Karunakaran, Adv
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36Section 36(1)Section 56Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(viia)

disallowance to the extent of ₹12,45,757/- and raised an addition of ₹9,80,44,618/- u/s.14A of the Act, was confirmed ITA Nos.337 & 338/19 :- 4 -: by the ld. CIT(A). Thus, the appeal filed by the assessee came to be partly allowed by the ld. CIT(A). Aggrieved by that part of the ld. CIT(A) order, which

DCIT NON CORPORATE CIRCLE I, CHENNAI vs. JAIN HOUSING, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

ITA 338/CHNY/2019[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai08 Aug 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. R. Clement RameshFor Respondent: Shri. M. Karunakaran, Adv
Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 36Section 36(1)Section 56Section 56(2)Section 56(2)(viia)

disallowance to the extent of ₹12,45,757/- and raised an addition of ₹9,80,44,618/- u/s.14A of the Act, was confirmed ITA Nos.337 & 338/19 :- 4 -: by the ld. CIT(A). Thus, the appeal filed by the assessee came to be partly allowed by the ld. CIT(A). Aggrieved by that part of the ld. CIT(A) order, which

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. I.P. RINGS LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

ITA 3538/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. R.Vijayaraghavan, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha, IRS, JCIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 35

Section 35(2AB). In view of the above, the action of the ITA Nos.3500 &3538/2018 :- 8 -: assessing officer in denying the deduction u/s 35(2AB) with respect to the expenses not approved by DSIR to the tune of Rs.11,31,458/- is held to be legally valid and thus upheld’’. The order of the ld. CIT(A) is well reasoned

I P RINGS LTD,KANCHEEPURAM vs. DCIT, CORP CIT-2(2), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

ITA 3500/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Nov 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao

For Appellant: Shri. R.Vijayaraghavan, AdvFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anitha, IRS, JCIT
Section 115JSection 143(3)Section 35

Section 35(2AB). In view of the above, the action of the ITA Nos.3500 &3538/2018 :- 8 -: assessing officer in denying the deduction u/s 35(2AB) with respect to the expenses not approved by DSIR to the tune of Rs.11,31,458/- is held to be legally valid and thus upheld’’. The order of the ld. CIT(A) is well reasoned