BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

88 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai88Cochin40Jaipur28Pune23Karnataka21Delhi20Bangalore17Lucknow16Ahmedabad16Mumbai16Kolkata16Amritsar12Hyderabad12Indore10Visakhapatnam9Rajkot9Guwahati7Raipur4Allahabad4Patna3Jabalpur2Chandigarh1Cuttack1SC1

Key Topics

Section 271B113Penalty77Section 271A56Section 44A49Section 14848Section 153A42Section 14731Section 14426Addition to Income22

G2K TRUST,TRICHY vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), TRICHY

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 3114/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.3113 & 3114/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 & 2018-19 G2K Trust, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No. 5, Abila Avenue, Santosh Garden, Ward 2(1), Kulumani Main Road, Woraiyur, Tiruchirappalli. Trichy 620 102. [Pan: Aactg4763G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. K. Abhirame, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. T. Mythili, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 02.02.2026 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24.02.2026 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders Dated 04.07.2025 & 15.07.2025 Passed By The Addl/Jcit(A), Panaji For The Assessment Years 2017-18 & 2018-19 Respectively.

For Appellant: Ms. K. Abhirame, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. T. Mythili, JCIT
Section 143(1)

condoning the delay with reference to untimely demise of Auditor, as we held in the aforementioned paras that there was no link between the death of the auditor and filing of appeal of before the first appellate authority as there was gap of approximately six months between the death of the auditor and intimation u/section

Showing 1–20 of 88 · Page 1 of 5

Section 270A17
Condonation of Delay15
Limitation/Time-bar11

G2K TRUST,TRICHY vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), TRICHY

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 3113/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.3113 & 3114/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 & 2018-19 G2K Trust, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No. 5, Abila Avenue, Santosh Garden, Ward 2(1), Kulumani Main Road, Woraiyur, Tiruchirappalli. Trichy 620 102. [Pan: Aactg4763G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. K. Abhirame, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. T. Mythili, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 02.02.2026 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24.02.2026 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders Dated 04.07.2025 & 15.07.2025 Passed By The Addl/Jcit(A), Panaji For The Assessment Years 2017-18 & 2018-19 Respectively.

For Appellant: Ms. K. Abhirame, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. T. Mythili, JCIT
Section 143(1)

condoning the delay with reference to untimely demise of Auditor, as we held in the aforementioned paras that there was no link between the death of the auditor and filing of appeal of before the first appellate authority as there was gap of approximately six months between the death of the auditor and intimation u/section

M/S. MAHESHWARI BUILDERS,ADYAR vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, NON CORPORATE WARD-15(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 60/CHNY/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai27 May 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Girish Agrawal

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Chinthapalli Mehar Chand, JCIT
Section 143(3)Section 253(2)Section 271BSection 273BSection 44ASection 5

condoned in the light of reasonable cause that exists in the delay. He submitted that provisions of section 271B of the Act is not mandatory

S.KIRUBAKARAN,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 642/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Oct 2017AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddyआयकर अपील सं./I T.A. No. 642/Mds/2017 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2013-14 Shri S. Kirubakaran, The Income Tax Officer, No. 16/13, Masoodhi Street, Vs. Non Corporate Ward 5(1), 121, Royapuram, Chennai 600 013. Nungambakkam High Road, [Pan: Athpk6093P] Chennai 600 034. (Appellant) (Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से / Appellant By : Shri M. Narayanan, Retd. Addl. Cit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Smt. S. Vijayaprabha, Jcit सुनवाई क" तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 13.09.2017 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.10.2017 आदेश /O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 5, Chennai Dated 29.09.2016 For The Assessment Year 2013-14. The Only Effective Ground Raised In The Appeal Of The Assessee Is That The Ld. Cit(A) Has Erred In Confirming The Penalty Levied Under Section 271B Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short].

For Appellant: Shri M. Narayanan, Retd. Addl. CITFor Respondent: Smt. S. Vijayaprabha, JCIT
Section 271BSection 44A

section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short]. 2. The appeal of the assessee is found to have been filed late by 53 days before the Tribunal. The assessee filed petition for condonation of 2 I.T.A. No. 642/M/17 delay

DHANAPAL GIRIDHARAN,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 9(3), CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2547/CHNY/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Aug 2022AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2546 & 2547/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:2013-14 & 2015-16 Shri Dhanapal Giridharan, Vs. The Income Tax Officer No. 29, Thirumalaiappan Street, Non Corporate Ward 9(3) Purasawalkam, Chennai 600 007. Chennai 600 034. [Pan:Ahypg9179R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : None ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 04.08.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 26.08.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao:

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 271BSection 44A

section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short]. 2. Both the appeals filed by the assessee are delayed by three days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee filed petitions for 2 I.T.A. Nos.2546 & 2547/Chny/18 condonation

DHANAPAL GIRIDHARAN,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 9(3), CHENNAI

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2546/CHNY/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Aug 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2546 & 2547/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years:2013-14 & 2015-16 Shri Dhanapal Giridharan, Vs. The Income Tax Officer No. 29, Thirumalaiappan Street, Non Corporate Ward 9(3) Purasawalkam, Chennai 600 007. Chennai 600 034. [Pan:Ahypg9179R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : None ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 04.08.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 26.08.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao:

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 271BSection 44A

section 271B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short]. 2. Both the appeals filed by the assessee are delayed by three days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. The assessee filed petitions for 2 I.T.A. Nos.2546 & 2547/Chny/18 condonation

M/S PERFECT STONE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO NFAC, DELHI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 785/CHNY/2022[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Oct 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.785/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 M/S. Perfect Stone Limited, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of New No. 7, Lvr Centre, Seshadri Income Tax, National Faceless Road, Alwarpet, Chennai 600 006. Assessment Centre, New Delhi. [Pan:Aaacp1931G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri G. Tarun, Advocate For Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 27.10.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 28.10.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), New Delhi, Dated 30.08.2022 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2016-17. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessment Order For The Assessment Year 2016-17 Was Passed Under Section 143(43) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short] On 23.12.2018. Since The Audit

For Appellant: Shri G. Tarun, Advocate for Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 143(43)Section 271BSection 274Section 44A

section 271B of the Act. 3. On being aggrieved, the assessee is in appeal before the Tribunal. The ld. Counsel for the assessee has submitted that there was delay of 51 days in filing the tax audit report and the assessee has filed a petition for condonation

IYERGOPAL ASHOKKUMAR,COIMBATORE vs. ITO-CHE-W-(61)(11), COIMBATOE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 182/CHNY/2023[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.182/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 Iyergopal Ashokkumar, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 658, P.N. Palayam Road, Puliyakulam, Che-W-61(11), Coimbatore 641 045. Coimbatore. [Pan:Ahqpa2689G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri N. Arjunraj For Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 28.03.2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 12.04.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), (National Faceless Appeal Centre) [Nfac], Delhi Dated 14.12.2022 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2015-16. 2. The Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Delayed By Two Days In Filing The Appeal Before The Tribunal. The Ld. Counsel For The Assessee Has Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Against Which, The Ld. Dr Has Not 2

For Appellant: Shri N. Arjunraj for Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 271BSection 4Section 44A

condone the delay of two days in filing the appeal and admit the appeal for adjudication. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee has not filed his return of income for the assessment year 2015-16 under section 139 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short]. A recovery survey was conducted in the business premises

M.S.BALAKRISHNAN,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 4(5), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3094/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 May 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri B. Sagadevan, JCIT
Section 144Section 271(1)(b)Section 271B

section 271B of the Act, the assessee filed belated appeals before the ld. CIT(A). In the petition filed for condonation of delay

M.S.BALAKRISHNAN,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 4(5), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3093/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 May 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri B. Sagadevan, JCIT
Section 144Section 271(1)(b)Section 271B

section 271B of the Act, the assessee filed belated appeals before the ld. CIT(A). In the petition filed for condonation of delay

M.S.BALAKRISHNAN,CHENNAI vs. ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 4(5), CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 3092/CHNY/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 May 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri B. Sagadevan, JCIT
Section 144Section 271(1)(b)Section 271B

section 271B of the Act, the assessee filed belated appeals before the ld. CIT(A). In the petition filed for condonation of delay

S.SRIDHARAN,TRICHY vs. DCIT, TRICHY

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 1116/CHNY/2015[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai19 Aug 2015AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri V. Durga Raoआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1116/Mds/2015 Assessment Year : 2006-07 Shri S. Sridharan, The Deputy Commissioner Of Plot 6 Ii Main Road, V. Income Tax, Gnanam Colony, Ramalinganagar, Circle – Ii, Trichy – 620 003. Trichy.

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. B. Nischal, JCIT
Section 143(1)Section 271BSection 44A

delay of 10 days is condoned and the appeal is admitted. 5. Coming to the merits of the case, facts in brief are that the assessee is an individual and he filed the return of income for the year under consideration enclosing audit report in Form 3CD and 3CB dated 09.03.2007, on 13.03.2007. The return filed by the assessee

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2358/CHNY/2019[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

271B of the Act vide orders of even date 31.08.2015 / 10.09.2015 / 30.09.2015. 2. At the outset, it is noticed that all the appeals of assessees Shri Shanthilal D Jain and Smt. Sharmila S Jain are delayed by 7 days to 138 days. The assessees have filed condonation petitions supported by affidavits for condoning the delay and admitting the appeals

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2357/CHNY/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

271B of the Act vide orders of even date 31.08.2015 / 10.09.2015 / 30.09.2015. 2. At the outset, it is noticed that all the appeals of assessees Shri Shanthilal D Jain and Smt. Sharmila S Jain are delayed by 7 days to 138 days. The assessees have filed condonation petitions supported by affidavits for condoning the delay and admitting the appeals

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2359/CHNY/2019[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

271B of the Act vide orders of even date 31.08.2015 / 10.09.2015 / 30.09.2015. 2. At the outset, it is noticed that all the appeals of assessees Shri Shanthilal D Jain and Smt. Sharmila S Jain are delayed by 7 days to 138 days. The assessees have filed condonation petitions supported by affidavits for condoning the delay and admitting the appeals

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2362/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

271B of the Act vide orders of even date 31.08.2015 / 10.09.2015 / 30.09.2015. 2. At the outset, it is noticed that all the appeals of assessees Shri Shanthilal D Jain and Smt. Sharmila S Jain are delayed by 7 days to 138 days. The assessees have filed condonation petitions supported by affidavits for condoning the delay and admitting the appeals

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2360/CHNY/2019[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

271B of the Act vide orders of even date 31.08.2015 / 10.09.2015 / 30.09.2015. 2. At the outset, it is noticed that all the appeals of assessees Shri Shanthilal D Jain and Smt. Sharmila S Jain are delayed by 7 days to 138 days. The assessees have filed condonation petitions supported by affidavits for condoning the delay and admitting the appeals

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2361/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

271B of the Act vide orders of even date 31.08.2015 / 10.09.2015 / 30.09.2015. 2. At the outset, it is noticed that all the appeals of assessees Shri Shanthilal D Jain and Smt. Sharmila S Jain are delayed by 7 days to 138 days. The assessees have filed condonation petitions supported by affidavits for condoning the delay and admitting the appeals

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2363/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

271B of the Act vide orders of even date 31.08.2015 / 10.09.2015 / 30.09.2015. 2. At the outset, it is noticed that all the appeals of assessees Shri Shanthilal D Jain and Smt. Sharmila S Jain are delayed by 7 days to 138 days. The assessees have filed condonation petitions supported by affidavits for condoning the delay and admitting the appeals

SHANTHILAL D JAIN,,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE - 2 (1),, CHENNAI

2400/CHNY/2019

ITA 2396/CHNY/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai20 May 2022AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Dr. M.L. Meena

Section 153ASection 271A

271B of the Act vide orders of even date 31.08.2015 / 10.09.2015 / 30.09.2015. 2. At the outset, it is noticed that all the appeals of assessees Shri Shanthilal D Jain and Smt. Sharmila S Jain are delayed by 7 days to 138 days. The assessees have filed condonation petitions supported by affidavits for condoning the delay and admitting the appeals