BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

103 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 230clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai103Karnataka101Mumbai101Pune91Delhi77Bangalore66Jaipur48Hyderabad41Kolkata38Ahmedabad33Visakhapatnam31Cochin25Indore13Panaji11Surat11Lucknow8Nagpur8Raipur6Guwahati5Chandigarh5Dehradun5Jodhpur4Rajkot4Patna4Agra3Cuttack3SC3Calcutta2Allahabad2Amritsar2Rajasthan1Andhra Pradesh1Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)45Addition to Income45Disallowance38Section 1132Section 271(1)(c)28Section 14725Section 80P(2)(a)23Condonation of Delay20Exemption

SRI SORIMUTHAYANNAR TEMPLE ,TIRUNELVELI vs. ITO, EXEMPTIONS WARD,, TIRUNELVELI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1754/CHNY/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1754/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/S. Sri Sorimuthayannar The Income Tax Officer, Temple, Vs. Exemptions Ward, Sinvampatti Ambasamudram, Tirunelveli. Tirunelveli – 627 416. Pan: Aabth 0590D (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri V. Arunachalesh, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Smt. Anitha, Addl.Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 26.08.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 26.08.2025

For Appellant: Shri V. Arunachalesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Anitha, Addl.CIT
Section 250

section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called ‘the Act’). The relevant Assessment Year is 2015-16. 2. There is a delay of 201 days in filing the appeal. The appeal ought to have been filed before ITAT on or before 03.11.2024. However, the appeal was filed belatedly on 19.06.2025. The assessee Trust has filed a petition

Showing 1–20 of 103 · Page 1 of 6

19
Section 14818
Deduction16
Section 26314

JAYA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CENTRL CIRCLE 1 (2), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for the assessment years 2012-13 & 2013-14 are allowed and for the assessment years

ITA 3114/CHNY/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Jul 2021AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 2915, 3114, 3115/Chny/2019 & 916/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar, CAFor Respondent: Shri S. Bharath, CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(2)Section 13(2)(a)Section 13(3)Section 13(3)(e)Section 143(3)

230, where it was clearly 25 I.TA. Nos. 2915, 3114 & 3115/Chny/2019 916/Chny/2020 held that denial of exemption u/s.11 should be limited only to amount which was diverted to persons referred to u/s.13 (3) in violation of section 13(2) of the Act. The ld.AR has also referred Circular No.387 dated 06.07.1984 issued by CBDT and submitted that the CBDT

JAYA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CENTRL CIRCLE 1 (2), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for the assessment years 2012-13 & 2013-14 are allowed and for the assessment years

ITA 2915/CHNY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Jul 2021AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 2915, 3114, 3115/Chny/2019 & 916/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar, CAFor Respondent: Shri S. Bharath, CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(2)Section 13(2)(a)Section 13(3)Section 13(3)(e)Section 143(3)

230, where it was clearly 25 I.TA. Nos. 2915, 3114 & 3115/Chny/2019 916/Chny/2020 held that denial of exemption u/s.11 should be limited only to amount which was diverted to persons referred to u/s.13 (3) in violation of section 13(2) of the Act. The ld.AR has also referred Circular No.387 dated 06.07.1984 issued by CBDT and submitted that the CBDT

JAYA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CENTRL CIRCLE 1 (2), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for the assessment years 2012-13 & 2013-14 are allowed and for the assessment years

ITA 3115/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Jul 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 2915, 3114, 3115/Chny/2019 & 916/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar, CAFor Respondent: Shri S. Bharath, CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(2)Section 13(2)(a)Section 13(3)Section 13(3)(e)Section 143(3)

230, where it was clearly 25 I.TA. Nos. 2915, 3114 & 3115/Chny/2019 916/Chny/2020 held that denial of exemption u/s.11 should be limited only to amount which was diverted to persons referred to u/s.13 (3) in violation of section 13(2) of the Act. The ld.AR has also referred Circular No.387 dated 06.07.1984 issued by CBDT and submitted that the CBDT

M/S JAYA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,THIRUVALLUR vs. DCIT, CC1(2), CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee for the assessment years 2012-13 & 2013-14 are allowed and for the assessment years

ITA 916/CHNY/2020[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai16 Jul 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.: 2915, 3114, 3115/Chny/2019 & 916/Chny/2020 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2017-18

For Appellant: Shri Y. Sridhar, CAFor Respondent: Shri S. Bharath, CIT
Section 11Section 12ASection 13(1)(c)Section 13(2)Section 13(2)(a)Section 13(3)Section 13(3)(e)Section 143(3)

230, where it was clearly 25 I.TA. Nos. 2915, 3114 & 3115/Chny/2019 916/Chny/2020 held that denial of exemption u/s.11 should be limited only to amount which was diverted to persons referred to u/s.13 (3) in violation of section 13(2) of the Act. The ld.AR has also referred Circular No.387 dated 06.07.1984 issued by CBDT and submitted that the CBDT

KELLER (M) SDN BHD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT INTL TAX 1(2), CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee stands allowed

ITA 1319/CHNY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai28 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.1319/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2018-2019) Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Keller (M) Sdn Bhd, Income Tax, 7Th Floor, Centennial Square, International Taxation 1(2) No.6A, Dr. Ambedkar Road, Chennai. Kodambakkam, Chennai 600 024. [Pan: Aagck 8014M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. Ashik Shah, C.A. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. Nilay Baran Som, Irs, Cit.

For Appellant: Shri. Ashik Shah, C.AFor Respondent: Shri. Nilay Baran Som, IRS, CIT
Section 133(6)Section 139Section 143(3)Section 147Section 154Section 239Section 263

condonation of delay 1 filed before the CBDT 1.1. Form 26AS of the Appellant for AY 2018-19 5 1.2. Form 26AS of the Appellant for AY 2019-20 9 1.3. Tax Audit Report in Form 3CA and 3CD of the Appellant 13 for AY 2018-19 1.4. Tax Audit Report in Form 3CA and 3CD of the Appellant

C JAYASINGH,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NON CORP WARD -1(2), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is treated as

ITA 608/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Apr 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.608/Chny/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2011-12) Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Mr. C. Jayasingh, 68/1A, Minisha Cars, Non-Corporate Ward-1(2) Greenways Road, R.A.Puram, Chennai-600 034. Chennai-600 028. Pan: Aibpc 4506A (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Mr. AR V.Sreenivasan, Addl.CITFor Respondent: 30.03.2022
Section 68

delay in filing of appeal is condoned and appeal filed by the assessee is admitted for adjudication. 3 5. The assessee has raised following grounds of appeal:- “1. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) went wrong in confirming the addition of Rs.52,07,880/- made by the Assessing Officer invoking the provisions of Section 68 of the Income

PONMUDI MUTHUSAMY GOUNDER TRUST,TIRUPPUR vs. DCIT (E), COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 2043/CHNY/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Aug 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Respondent: Ms. R. Anita, Addl.CIT

230/- 05.02.2020 01136 Rs.91,611/- 21.06.2019 15797 Rs.1,39,750/- 10.01.2018 02051 Rs.25,00,000/- 10.01.2018 40498 Rs.10,00,000/- 08.12.2017 01755 Rs.5,00,000/- Total demand paid Rs.51,77,330/- (20.37% of demand) Assessment Year: 2014-15 Demand raised: Rs.1,25,19,620/- Date of assessment order: 29.12.2016 Date Challan No Amount Paid 05.08.2024 02900 Rs.1

PONMUDI MUTHUSAMY GOUNDER TRUST,TIRUPPUR vs. DCIT (E), COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 2042/CHNY/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Aug 2024AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Respondent: Ms. R. Anita, Addl.CIT

230/- 05.02.2020 01136 Rs.91,611/- 21.06.2019 15797 Rs.1,39,750/- 10.01.2018 02051 Rs.25,00,000/- 10.01.2018 40498 Rs.10,00,000/- 08.12.2017 01755 Rs.5,00,000/- Total demand paid Rs.51,77,330/- (20.37% of demand) Assessment Year: 2014-15 Demand raised: Rs.1,25,19,620/- Date of assessment order: 29.12.2016 Date Challan No Amount Paid 05.08.2024 02900 Rs.1

PONMUDI MUTHUSAMY GOUNDER TRUST,TIRUPPUR vs. DCIT(E), COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 2044/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Aug 2024AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Respondent: Ms. R. Anita, Addl.CIT

230/- 05.02.2020 01136 Rs.91,611/- 21.06.2019 15797 Rs.1,39,750/- 10.01.2018 02051 Rs.25,00,000/- 10.01.2018 40498 Rs.10,00,000/- 08.12.2017 01755 Rs.5,00,000/- Total demand paid Rs.51,77,330/- (20.37% of demand) Assessment Year: 2014-15 Demand raised: Rs.1,25,19,620/- Date of assessment order: 29.12.2016 Date Challan No Amount Paid 05.08.2024 02900 Rs.1

PONMUDI MUTHUSAMY GOUNDER TRUST,TIRUPPUR vs. DCIT(E), COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 2045/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Amitabh Shukla

For Respondent: Ms. R. Anita, Addl.CIT

230/- 05.02.2020 01136 Rs.91,611/- 21.06.2019 15797 Rs.1,39,750/- 10.01.2018 02051 Rs.25,00,000/- 10.01.2018 40498 Rs.10,00,000/- 08.12.2017 01755 Rs.5,00,000/- Total demand paid Rs.51,77,330/- (20.37% of demand) Assessment Year: 2014-15 Demand raised: Rs.1,25,19,620/- Date of assessment order: 29.12.2016 Date Challan No Amount Paid 05.08.2024 02900 Rs.1

ALAMELU MEMORIAL CHARITABLE TRUST,THIRUVALLUR vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 814/CHNY/2025[-]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Jun 2025

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Amitabh Shuklaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.814/Chny/2025 Alamelu Memorial Charitable Trust, Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Tax No. 46, 2Nd Street, Sp Munusamy [Exemptions], Nagar, Gnt Road, Thervazhi, Chennai. Gummidipoondi, Thiruvallur 601 201. [Pan:Aaita6393E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri K. Vishva Padmanabhan, C.A. ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri G. Nandha Kumar, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 04.06.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.06.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 11.03.2024 Passed By The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemption), Chennai In Rejecting The Application Filed In Form 10Ab Under Clause (Iii) Of First Proviso To Section 80G(5) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” In Short].

For Appellant: Shri K. Vishva Padmanabhan, C.AFor Respondent: Shri G. Nandha Kumar, CIT
Section 10Section 12ASection 4Section 80GSection 80G(5)Section 80G(5)(iii)Section 80G(5)(iv)

condoning the delay in filing Form 10AB. 4. We note that the assessee filed online application on 09.10.2023 in Form No. 10AB seeking approval under clause (iii) of first proviso to section 80G(5) of the Act. The ld. CIT(E), while processing the application, asked the assessee to show-cause as to why its application should not be rejected

P.P. ENTERPRISES,BENGALURU vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, COIMBATORE

ITA 3382/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17

condoned. In respect of the remaining assessees, there is no delay in filing the appeals, and proof of receipt of the orders of the ld. CIT(A) has been duly enclosed with Form No. 36. Further, since all the 61 appeals arise out of the same search proceedings, and the issues involved therein are common, identical, and interconnected, the appeals

M/S. P.P. ENTERPRISES,BENGALURU vs. ACIT< CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, COIMBATORE

ITA 3383/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17

condoned. In respect of the remaining assessees, there is no delay in filing the appeals, and proof of receipt of the orders of the ld. CIT(A) has been duly enclosed with Form No. 36. Further, since all the 61 appeals arise out of the same search proceedings, and the issues involved therein are common, identical, and interconnected, the appeals

P. PALANISAMY,BENGALURU vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, COIMBATORE

ITA 1121/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17

condoned. In respect of the remaining assessees, there is no delay in filing the appeals, and proof of receipt of the orders of the ld. CIT(A) has been duly enclosed with Form No. 36. Further, since all the 61 appeals arise out of the same search proceedings, and the issues involved therein are common, identical, and interconnected, the appeals

M/S. P.P. FINANCIERS,KARUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, COIMBATORE

ITA 3392/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17

condoned. In respect of the remaining assessees, there is no delay in filing the appeals, and proof of receipt of the orders of the ld. CIT(A) has been duly enclosed with Form No. 36. Further, since all the 61 appeals arise out of the same search proceedings, and the issues involved therein are common, identical, and interconnected, the appeals

P. PALANISAMY,BENGALURU vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3, COIMBATORE

ITA 213/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17

condoned. In respect of the remaining assessees, there is no delay in filing the appeals, and proof of receipt of the orders of the ld. CIT(A) has been duly enclosed with Form No. 36. Further, since all the 61 appeals arise out of the same search proceedings, and the issues involved therein are common, identical, and interconnected, the appeals

M/S. P.P. FINANCIERS,KARUR vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, COIMBATORE

ITA 3389/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Feb 2026AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17

condoned. In respect of the remaining assessees, there is no delay in filing the appeals, and proof of receipt of the orders of the ld. CIT(A) has been duly enclosed with Form No. 36. Further, since all the 61 appeals arise out of the same search proceedings, and the issues involved therein are common, identical, and interconnected, the appeals

L KARUPPUSAMY,BENGALURU vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-3,, COIMBATORE

ITA 224/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17

condoned. In respect of the remaining assessees, there is no delay in filing the appeals, and proof of receipt of the orders of the ld. CIT(A) has been duly enclosed with Form No. 36. Further, since all the 61 appeals arise out of the same search proceedings, and the issues involved therein are common, identical, and interconnected, the appeals

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRLCE -3, COIMBATORE, COIMBATORE vs. P P ENTERPRISES, BENGALURU

ITA 2530/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1119, 1120 & 1121/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.209 To 213 & 214/Chny/2025 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2010-11 To 2014-15 & 2016-17

condoned. In respect of the remaining assessees, there is no delay in filing the appeals, and proof of receipt of the orders of the ld. CIT(A) has been duly enclosed with Form No. 36. Further, since all the 61 appeals arise out of the same search proceedings, and the issues involved therein are common, identical, and interconnected, the appeals