KK 168 NARIPALLI PACS LD.,NARIPALLI vs. ITO, WARD-1, DHARMAPURI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Ratnesh Nandan Sahayआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1619/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2022-23 Kk 168 Naripalli Primary Agri. Co- Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Operative Society Limited, Naripalli, Ward 1, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. Tamil Nadu 636 906. [Pan:Aabak5075F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S.P. Chidambaram, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Sandhya Rani Kure, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 18.09.2025 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 23.09.2025 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Dated 04.04.2025 Passed By The Addl/Jcit(A)-1, Bengaluru For The Assessment Year 2022-23. 2. We Find That This Appeal Is Filed With A Delay Of 2 Days. The Assessee Filed An Affidavit For Condonation Of Delay Stating The Reasons. Upon Hearing Both The Parties & On Examination Of The Said Affidavit, We Find The Reasons Stated By The Assessee Are Bonafide, Which Really

168 Naripalli Primary Agri. Co- Vs. The Income Tax Officer, operative Society Limited, Naripalli, Ward 1, Harur Taluk, Dharmapuri District, Dharmapuri. Tamil Nadu 636 906. [PAN:AABAK5075F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant by : Shri S.P. Chidambaram, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent by : Ms. Sandhya Rani Kure, JCIT सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of hearing : 18.09.2025 घोषणा

SHRI PACHAMUTHU RAVI,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(3), CHENNAI

168 days delay and explained the delay with support of an affidavit as well as application for condonation of delay. After perusal of the contents of the petition for condonation of delay as well as affidavit, we find the reasons stated therein are sufficient to condone the delay and accordingly, we condone the delay and proceed to decide the grounds

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM vs. THRIVENI EARTHMOVERS PVT. LTD., SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2280, 2281, 2282 & 2283/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. M/S. Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt Ltd, Of Income Tax, 22/110, Greenways Road, Central Circle, Fairlands, Salem Salem 636 016. [Pan Aabct 6759R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

condone the delay of two days in filing the appeals and admit the appeals for adjudication. Since, the identical facts and issues are involved in these 3. appeals, we proceed to dispose the same vide this common order. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant to 4. the appeal in ITA No.2280/Chny/2018 for assessment year

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM vs. THRIVENI EARTHMOVERS PVT. LTD., SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2280, 2281, 2282 & 2283/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. M/S. Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt Ltd, Of Income Tax, 22/110, Greenways Road, Central Circle, Fairlands, Salem Salem 636 016. [Pan Aabct 6759R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

condone the delay of two days in filing the appeals and admit the appeals for adjudication. Since, the identical facts and issues are involved in these 3. appeals, we proceed to dispose the same vide this common order. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant to 4. the appeal in ITA No.2280/Chny/2018 for assessment year

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM vs. THRIVENI EARTHMOVERS PVT. LTD., SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2280, 2281, 2282 & 2283/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. M/S. Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt Ltd, Of Income Tax, 22/110, Greenways Road, Central Circle, Fairlands, Salem Salem 636 016. [Pan Aabct 6759R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

condone the delay of two days in filing the appeals and admit the appeals for adjudication. Since, the identical facts and issues are involved in these 3. appeals, we proceed to dispose the same vide this common order. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant to 4. the appeal in ITA No.2280/Chny/2018 for assessment year

ACIT CENTRAL CIRCLE, SALEM vs. THRIVENI EARTHMOVERS PVT. LTD., SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos. 2280, 2281, 2282 & 2283/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years :2011-12, 2012-13, 2013-14 & 2014-15 The Assistant Commissioner Vs. M/S. Thriveni Earthmovers Pvt Ltd, Of Income Tax, 22/110, Greenways Road, Central Circle, Fairlands, Salem Salem 636 016. [Pan Aabct 6759R] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

condone the delay of two days in filing the appeals and admit the appeals for adjudication. Since, the identical facts and issues are involved in these 3. appeals, we proceed to dispose the same vide this common order. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant to 4. the appeal in ITA No.2280/Chny/2018 for assessment year

DCIT, CENTRAL CIR-1, MADURAI vs. LATE D CHANDRAN, TURICORIN

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.124, 130 & 131/Chny/2019 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14. The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. C. Nilavathy, Income Tax, No.137A, Pudurpandiapuram, Central Circle -1, Tuticorin 628 002. Madurai.

condone the delay of thirteen days in filing the appeals and admit the appeals for adjudication. 4. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant in ITA No.165/Chny/2019 in the case of late Shri. D. Chandran for assessment year 2009-10 are stated herein. The Revenue raised the following grounds of appeal: 5. ‘’1. The order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIR-1, MADURAI vs. LATE D CHANDRAN, TURICORIN

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.124, 130 & 131/Chny/2019 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14. The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. C. Nilavathy, Income Tax, No.137A, Pudurpandiapuram, Central Circle -1, Tuticorin 628 002. Madurai.

condone the delay of thirteen days in filing the appeals and admit the appeals for adjudication. 4. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant in ITA No.165/Chny/2019 in the case of late Shri. D. Chandran for assessment year 2009-10 are stated herein. The Revenue raised the following grounds of appeal: 5. ‘’1. The order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, MADURAI vs. C NILAVATHY, TUTICORIN

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.124, 130 & 131/Chny/2019 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14. The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. C. Nilavathy, Income Tax, No.137A, Pudurpandiapuram, Central Circle -1, Tuticorin 628 002. Madurai.

condone the delay of thirteen days in filing the appeals and admit the appeals for adjudication. 4. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant in ITA No.165/Chny/2019 in the case of late Shri. D. Chandran for assessment year 2009-10 are stated herein. The Revenue raised the following grounds of appeal: 5. ‘’1. The order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIR-1, MADURAI vs. LATE D CHANDRAN, TURICORIN

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.124, 130 & 131/Chny/2019 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14. The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. C. Nilavathy, Income Tax, No.137A, Pudurpandiapuram, Central Circle -1, Tuticorin 628 002. Madurai.

condone the delay of thirteen days in filing the appeals and admit the appeals for adjudication. 4. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant in ITA No.165/Chny/2019 in the case of late Shri. D. Chandran for assessment year 2009-10 are stated herein. The Revenue raised the following grounds of appeal: 5. ‘’1. The order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIR-1, MADURAI vs. LATE D CHANDRAN, TURICORIN

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.124, 130 & 131/Chny/2019 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14. The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. C. Nilavathy, Income Tax, No.137A, Pudurpandiapuram, Central Circle -1, Tuticorin 628 002. Madurai.

condone the delay of thirteen days in filing the appeals and admit the appeals for adjudication. 4. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant in ITA No.165/Chny/2019 in the case of late Shri. D. Chandran for assessment year 2009-10 are stated herein. The Revenue raised the following grounds of appeal: 5. ‘’1. The order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIR-1, MADURAI vs. LATE D CHANDRAN, TURICORIN

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.124, 130 & 131/Chny/2019 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14. The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. C. Nilavathy, Income Tax, No.137A, Pudurpandiapuram, Central Circle -1, Tuticorin 628 002. Madurai.

condone the delay of thirteen days in filing the appeals and admit the appeals for adjudication. 4. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant in ITA No.165/Chny/2019 in the case of late Shri. D. Chandran for assessment year 2009-10 are stated herein. The Revenue raised the following grounds of appeal: 5. ‘’1. The order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIR-1, MADURAI vs. LATE D CHANDRAN, TURICORIN

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.124, 130 & 131/Chny/2019 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14. The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. C. Nilavathy, Income Tax, No.137A, Pudurpandiapuram, Central Circle -1, Tuticorin 628 002. Madurai.

condone the delay of thirteen days in filing the appeals and admit the appeals for adjudication. 4. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant in ITA No.165/Chny/2019 in the case of late Shri. D. Chandran for assessment year 2009-10 are stated herein. The Revenue raised the following grounds of appeal: 5. ‘’1. The order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, MADURAI vs. C NILAVATHY, TUTICORIN

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.124, 130 & 131/Chny/2019 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14. The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. C. Nilavathy, Income Tax, No.137A, Pudurpandiapuram, Central Circle -1, Tuticorin 628 002. Madurai.

condone the delay of thirteen days in filing the appeals and admit the appeals for adjudication. 4. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant in ITA No.165/Chny/2019 in the case of late Shri. D. Chandran for assessment year 2009-10 are stated herein. The Revenue raised the following grounds of appeal: 5. ‘’1. The order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIR-1, MADURAI vs. LATE D CHANDRAN, TURICORIN

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.124, 130 & 131/Chny/2019 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14. The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. C. Nilavathy, Income Tax, No.137A, Pudurpandiapuram, Central Circle -1, Tuticorin 628 002. Madurai.

condone the delay of thirteen days in filing the appeals and admit the appeals for adjudication. 4. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant in ITA No.165/Chny/2019 in the case of late Shri. D. Chandran for assessment year 2009-10 are stated herein. The Revenue raised the following grounds of appeal: 5. ‘’1. The order

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, MADURAI vs. C NILAVATHY, TUTICORIN

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue in ITA

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Inturi Rama Rao] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.124, 130 & 131/Chny/2019 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2010-11, 2011-12 & 2013-14. The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. C. Nilavathy, Income Tax, No.137A, Pudurpandiapuram, Central Circle -1, Tuticorin 628 002. Madurai.

condone the delay of thirteen days in filing the appeals and admit the appeals for adjudication. 4. For the sake of convenience and clarity the facts relevant in ITA No.165/Chny/2019 in the case of late Shri. D. Chandran for assessment year 2009-10 are stated herein. The Revenue raised the following grounds of appeal: 5. ‘’1. The order

PALAM RURAL CENTRE,TIRUPPUR vs. ACIT, EXEMPTIONS,, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes and the Stay Application filed by the assessee is dismissed as infructuous

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R.Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:1560/Chny/2025 & S.A.No.51Chny/2025 [Arising In Ita No.: 1560/Chny/2025] िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year:2018-19 Palam Rural Centre, The Asst. Commissioner Of Pethampalayam, Vs. Income Tax (Exemptions), Veerapandi S.O., Coimbatore. Tiruppur – 641 605. [Pan: Aaatp-2929-F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. Edser Raj, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Sita Krishnamoorthy, J.C.I.T.

section 139(5) on 23/09/2020 vide Ack. No.576055421230920. The said return of income also remains unanswered from the side of the Income Tax Department. 7. Later, aggrieved by the Intimation u/s.143(1) of the Act, the assessee filed an appeal before the ADDL/JCIT(A)-2, Vishakhapatnam belatedly stating that the delay in filing the appeal was not intentional or deliberate

VICTORIA EDUCATIONAL TRUST,CHENNAI vs. ITO, EXEMPTION WARD-3,, CHENNAI

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George George K & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:946/Chny/2025 धनिाजरण वर्ज / Assessment Year: 2022-23 Victoria Educational Trust, Ito, 62, 6Th Street, Vs. Exemptions Ward 3, S.R.P.Colony, Chennai. Peravallur, Chennai – 600 082. [Pan:Aabtv-0115-A] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. N. Arjun Raj, Advocate प्रत्यथी की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Kumar Chandan, J.C.I.T.

condonation of delay in filing the audit report in Form No. 10B for the reasons stated thereon. 11. The assessee in the pending first appeal against the intimation order dated had assailed the adjustment of disallowance of entire claim of tax exemption in terms of Section 11 of the Act by the CPC, in the intimation order passed in terms

P & C CONSTRUCTION P. LTD.,ERODE vs. ACIT, ERODE

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri G. Manjunatha, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.3242 & 3243/Chny/2016 िनधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years: 2007-08 & 2008-09 M/S.P & C Constructions (P) Ltd., V. The Asst. Commissioner Of No.140, P & C Towers, Income Tax, Perundurai Road, Range-I, Erode-638 011. Erode [Pan: Aabcp 2483 L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) : अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By Mr.B.Parthasarathy, Adv. ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Ms.M.S.Deeptha, Jcit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 18.05.2022 घोषणा क" तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.05.2022

delay in filing of these appeals for both the assessment years, are condoned and appeals filed by the assessee are admitted for adjudication. 4. The brief facts of the case are that the assessee company is engaged in the business of civil engineering construction contract, had filed its return of income for the AY 2007-08 on 20.03.2008, admiting total