BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

360 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 119clear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai360Mumbai276Delhi218Karnataka148Bangalore133Kolkata126Pune120Ahmedabad108Chandigarh102Hyderabad62Jaipur56Calcutta38Cuttack38Indore36Nagpur33Surat31Lucknow28Guwahati23Rajkot21Cochin18Agra14Varanasi14Amritsar13Visakhapatnam13Jodhpur11Raipur11Dehradun8SC7Patna6Jabalpur6Kerala4Panaji4Telangana4Allahabad3Himachal Pradesh1Andhra Pradesh1Punjab & Haryana1Rajasthan1Orissa1Ranchi1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)59Section 80P51Section 1145Section 139(1)45Section 119(2)(b)27Condonation of Delay26Section 12A25Deduction25Addition to Income

G2K TRUST,TRICHY vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), TRICHY

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 3114/CHNY/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Feb 2026AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.3113 & 3114/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 & 2018-19 G2K Trust, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No. 5, Abila Avenue, Santosh Garden, Ward 2(1), Kulumani Main Road, Woraiyur, Tiruchirappalli. Trichy 620 102. [Pan: Aactg4763G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. K. Abhirame, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. T. Mythili, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 02.02.2026 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24.02.2026 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders Dated 04.07.2025 & 15.07.2025 Passed By The Addl/Jcit(A), Panaji For The Assessment Years 2017-18 & 2018-19 Respectively.

For Appellant: Ms. K. Abhirame, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. T. Mythili, JCIT
Section 143(1)

condone such delay on the authorities concerned. Paragraphs 30 and 31 of Sarvodaya Charitable Trust (Supra) reads as under: “30. We may also refer to and rely upon a decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of G.V. Infosutions (P) Ltd. v. Dy: CIT [2019] 102 taxmann.com 397/261 Taxman 482. We may quote the relevant observations thus (page

Showing 1–20 of 360 · Page 1 of 18

...
24
Exemption21
Disallowance18
Section 80G17

G2K TRUST,TRICHY vs. ITO, WARD-2(1), TRICHY

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 3113/CHNY/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai24 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. Nos.3113 & 3114/Chny/2025 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18 & 2018-19 G2K Trust, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, No. 5, Abila Avenue, Santosh Garden, Ward 2(1), Kulumani Main Road, Woraiyur, Tiruchirappalli. Trichy 620 102. [Pan: Aactg4763G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Ms. K. Abhirame, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. T. Mythili, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 02.02.2026 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 24.02.2026 आदेश /O R D E R Per S.S. Viswanethra Ravi: Both The Appeals Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against Separate Orders Dated 04.07.2025 & 15.07.2025 Passed By The Addl/Jcit(A), Panaji For The Assessment Years 2017-18 & 2018-19 Respectively.

For Appellant: Ms. K. Abhirame, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. T. Mythili, JCIT
Section 143(1)

condone such delay on the authorities concerned. Paragraphs 30 and 31 of Sarvodaya Charitable Trust (Supra) reads as under: “30. We may also refer to and rely upon a decision of the Delhi High Court in the case of G.V. Infosutions (P) Ltd. v. Dy: CIT [2019] 102 taxmann.com 397/261 Taxman 482. We may quote the relevant observations thus (page

SRI LAKSHMINARAYAN EDUCATIONAL TRUST,DHARMAPURI vs. ACIT(EXEMPTIONS), COIMBATORE

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed for the statistical purposes

ITA 1435/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri S.R.Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.: 1435/Chny/2024 िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2018-19 Sri Lakshminarayan Assistant Commissioner Of Educational Trust, V. Income Tax (Exemptions), 14/1, Bye Pass Road Coimbatore. Dharmapuri, Dharmapuri – 636 701. [Pan: Aahts-0652-B] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. H. Yeshwanth Kumar, Ca : Smt. M.S. Deeptha, Jcit ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 08.08.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09.08.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. H. Yeshwanth Kumar, CA
Section 11Section 119Section 119(2)Section 12ASection 143Section 143(1)

condonation of delay in compliance with any provision of the Act. Section 119(2) reads as follows: Section 119(2) (a) (b) the Board

NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATION,MADURAI vs. ITO,EXEMPTION WARD, MADURAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 793/CHNY/2023[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai07 Sept 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri V. Durga Raoआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.793/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 Nephrology Association, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, 6/6-B2, Sivagangai Road, Exemption Ward, Madurai North, Madurai. Tamil Nadu 625 020. [Pan:Aaban7750J] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri G. Tarun, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Suresh Guduri, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 07.09.2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 07.09.2023

For Appellant: Shri G. Tarun, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Suresh Guduri, JCIT
Section 11(2)Section 11(5)Section 119Section 119(2)

delay in filing return of income and Form No. 10 for the assessment year: 2016 - 17 vide DIN & Order No. ITBA/COM/F/17/2022-23/1044549117(1) dated 08.08.2022. The Petitioner/Assessee hereafter was on the bonafide impression that the jurisdictional Assessing Officer would give effect to the condonation order passed under Section 119

K1444 METTUPALAYAM CO-OP. BUILDING SOCIETY LIMITED,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT CPC , BEGNALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 46/CHNY/2023[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Mar 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.46/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2018-19 K1444 Mettupalayam Co-Op. Building Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Society Limited, Co-Operative Colony, Income Tax - Cpc, Mettupalayam, Coimbatore 641 301. Bengaluru. [Pan: Aadam3770D] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate [Erode] ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 07.03.2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.03.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi, Dated 26.12.2022 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Filed The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2018-19 On 23.03.2019 Declaring Total Income At ₹.6,64,021/- After Claiming Deduction Under Section 80P Of 2

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate [Erode]For Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 80P

section 119(2)(b) of the Act before the CBDT requesting for condonation of delay in filing the return of income

S2754 SLM CORPORATION ELE AND MID SCHOOL TEACHERS COOP T 7C SOC LIMITED,SALEM vs. ADIT,CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 38/CHNY/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Mar 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.38/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20 S2754 Slm Corporation Ele & Mid Vs. The Assistant Director Of School Teachers Co-Op. T & C Soc. Income Tax - Cpc, Ltd., No. 22, Car Street, Bengaluru. Salem 636 001, Tamil Nadu. [Pan: Aaras6200L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate [Erode] ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 07.03.2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.03.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi, Dated 25.11.2022 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2019-20. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Filed The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2019-20 On 03.10.2020 Admitting Nil Income, After Claiming Deduction Under Section 80P Of The Income Tax

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate [Erode]For Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 80P

section 119(2)(b) of the Act before the CBDT requesting for condonation of delay in filing the return of income

THE NEDUNCHALAI NAGAR CO-OPERATIVE HOUSE BUILDING SOCIETY LIMITED,SALEM vs. ADIT-CPC,BENGALURU, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 608/CHNY/2023[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Aug 2023AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manjunatha, G.आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.608/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2021-22 The Nedunchalai Nagar Co-Operative Vs. The Income Tax Officer, House Building Society Limited, Ward 1(1), 177/9, Bangalow Street, Mustaj Salem. Towers, Suramangalam Main Road, Thiruvagoundanur, Salem 636 005. [Pan:Aactt0358G] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri Ar V Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 18.07.2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 30.08.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi Dated 15.03.2023 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2021-22. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Has Filed The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2021-22 On 16.03.2022 Admitting Nil

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri AR V Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT
Section 119(2)Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 80P

119(2) of the Act dated 16.03.2022 to condone the delay in filing the return of income. Neither the CPC nor the ld. CIT(A) considered the condonation petition filed by the assessee under section

THE PALLIPALAYAM FRMERS SERVICE CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED,NAMAKKAL vs. ITO CIRCLE 1, , ERODE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 964/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai21 Aug 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ss Viswanethra Ravi & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.964/Chny/2024 िनधा8रण वष8 /Assessment Year: 2018-19

For Appellant: Ms. G. Vardhini Karthik, AdvocateFor Respondent: Ms. R. Anita, Addl. CIT
Section 119(2)Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 143(3)Section 80ASection 80A(5)Section 80PSection 80P(2)

section 80AC of the Act, even though the application for :- 2 -: condonation of delay u/s 119(2)(b) as per CBDT

K1578 SENJERIPUTHUR PACCS,TIRUPUR vs. ITO,WARD-2(4), TIRUPUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 783/CHNY/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai25 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.783/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20 K1578 Senjeriputhur Primary Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Co-Operative Credit Ward 2(4), Society, Senjeriputhur, Senjeriputhur Tirupur. Post, Palladam, Tirupur 641 671. [Pan:Aabak0914F] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate (Erode) ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri D. Hema Bhupal, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 25.07.2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 25.07.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi Dated 04.05.2023 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2019-20. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Has Filed The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2019-20 On 30.09.2020 Admitting Nil Income After Claiming Deduction Under Section 80P Of The Income Tax Act

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate (Erode)For Respondent: Shri D. Hema Bhupal, JCIT
Section 119Section 119(2)Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 80P

section 119(2) of the Act to condone the delay in filing the return of income. It was further submission

THE ERODE CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION EMP CO-OP T& C LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ITO, WARD 1 (1), ERODE

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 510/CHNY/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jul 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.509 & 510/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2018-2019 & 2020-2021)

For Appellant: Ms. G. Vardini Karthik, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV Srinivasan, IRS, Addl. CIT
Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 2(6)Section 80ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

section 139(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Circular No. 13/2023 allows condonation of delay for deduction u/s 80P 4) The CIT(A) failed to see that CBDT had issued a Circular No. 13/2023 dated 26.07.2023 allowing the co-operative societies to claim deduction u/s 80P by filing condonation of delay Petition u/s 119

THE ERODE CITY MUNICIPAL CORPORATION EMP CO-OP T& C LIMITED,ERODE vs. ITO, WARD 1(1), ERODE

In the result, the appeal in ITA No

ITA 509/CHNY/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai22 Jul 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.509 & 510/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2018-2019 & 2020-2021)

For Appellant: Ms. G. Vardini Karthik, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri ARV Srinivasan, IRS, Addl. CIT
Section 119(2)(b)Section 139(1)Section 139(4)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 2(6)Section 80ASection 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

section 139(4) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Circular No. 13/2023 allows condonation of delay for deduction u/s 80P 4) The CIT(A) failed to see that CBDT had issued a Circular No. 13/2023 dated 26.07.2023 allowing the co-operative societies to claim deduction u/s 80P by filing condonation of delay Petition u/s 119

NO 779 VEERAGANUR PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO- OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY,SALEM vs. ITO, WARD-1(6),SALEM, SALEM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA 269/CHNY/2024 for assessment year 2021-2022 is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 269/CHNY/2024[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai17 Apr 2024AY 2021-22

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.269/Chny/2024 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2021-22) No.779 Veeraraganur Primary Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Co-Operative Credit Ward 1(6), Society, Salem. Veeragannur Post, Gangavalli, Attur Taluk, Salem. [Pan: Aaaan 3985A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. P. Sajit Kumar, Irs, Jcit. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 17.04.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 17.04.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Manu Kumar Giri ()

For Appellant: Shri. S. Sridhar, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. P. Sajit Kumar, IRS, JCIT
Section 119(2)Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(1)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(c)Section 80P(2)(d)

condonation of delay before the CBDT under section 119(2)(b) of the Act, it is opined that once the delay

SS-10 PUPM THRIFT SOCIETY,SALEM vs. ADIT-CPC, BENGALURU

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 47/CHNY/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Mar 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.47/Chny/2023 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2019-20 Ss 10 Pupm Thrift Society, Vs. The Assistant Director Of Harur Main Road, Ayothiyapattinam Income Tax - Cpc, Post, Valappady Taluk, Salem 636 103. Bengaluru. [Pan: Aavas3179A] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate [Erode] ""थ" की ओर से/Respondent By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 07.03.2023 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 29.03.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [Nfac], Delhi, Dated 19.12.2022 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2019-20. 2. Brief Facts Of The Case Are That The Assessee Has Not Filed The Return Of Income For The Assessment Year 2019-20 Within The Due Date. Therefore, In The Intimation Order Under Section 143(1) Of The Income Tax

For Appellant: Shri S. Sridhar, Advocate [Erode]For Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 119(2)(b)Section 143(1)Section 80P

condonation of delay filed before the CBDT under section 119(2)(b) of the Act, the ld. Counsel for the assessee

ADVOCATES WELFARE FUND OF THE BAR COUNCIL OF TAMIL NADU,CHENNAI vs. DDIT, OSD, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the assessees and the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1195/CHNY/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jul 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan

For Respondent: Sh. P. Radhakrishnan, JCIT
Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 4

Section 119(2)(b) of the Act praying for condonation of delay for the assessment year 2003-04 onwards till

ADVOCATES WELFARE FUND OF THE BAR COUNCIL OF TAMIL NADU,CHENNAI vs. DDIT, OSD, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the assessees and the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1198/CHNY/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jul 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan

For Respondent: Sh. P. Radhakrishnan, JCIT
Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 4

Section 119(2)(b) of the Act praying for condonation of delay for the assessment year 2003-04 onwards till

BAR COUNCIL OF TAMIL NADU,CHENNAI vs. DDIT, OSD, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the assessees and the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1200/CHNY/2014[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jul 2016AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan

For Respondent: Sh. P. Radhakrishnan, JCIT
Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 4

Section 119(2)(b) of the Act praying for condonation of delay for the assessment year 2003-04 onwards till

BAR COUNCIL OF TAMIL NADU,CHENNAI vs. DDIT, OSD, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the assessees and the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1201/CHNY/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jul 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan

For Respondent: Sh. P. Radhakrishnan, JCIT
Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 4

Section 119(2)(b) of the Act praying for condonation of delay for the assessment year 2003-04 onwards till

BAR COUNCIL OF TAMIL NADU,CHENNAI vs. DDIT, OSD, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the assessees and the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1204/CHNY/2014[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jul 2016AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan

For Respondent: Sh. P. Radhakrishnan, JCIT
Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 4

Section 119(2)(b) of the Act praying for condonation of delay for the assessment year 2003-04 onwards till

DDIT, CHENNAI vs. ADVOATES WELFARE FUND OF THE BAR COUNCIL OF TAMILNADU, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the assessees and the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1604/CHNY/2014[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jul 2016AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan

For Respondent: Sh. P. Radhakrishnan, JCIT
Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 4

Section 119(2)(b) of the Act praying for condonation of delay for the assessment year 2003-04 onwards till

ADVOCATES WELFARE FUND OF THE BAR COUNCIL OF TAMIL NADU,CHENNAI vs. DDIT, OSD, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the assessees and the Revenue are allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 1196/CHNY/2014[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai15 Jul 2016AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan

For Respondent: Sh. P. Radhakrishnan, JCIT
Section 119(2)(b)Section 12ASection 4

Section 119(2)(b) of the Act praying for condonation of delay for the assessment year 2003-04 onwards till