ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. M.CT. M GLOBAL INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, while the assessee’s appeals in I

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1873/Mds/2008 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.456/Mds/2009 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1102/Mds/2011 आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.115 & 1936/Mds/2012 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2009-10 M/S M.Ct.M. Global Investments Pvt. The Assistant Commissioner Of Ltd., V. Income Tax, 761, Anna Salai, Company Circle Iv(1), Chennai - 600 002. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aabcm 9738 K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

capital gain. This Tribunal further found that the income earned by the Malaysian branch of the assessee-company is taxable in India and not taxable in Malaysia. In view of the decision of this Tribunal in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 2000- 01, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S M.CT.M.GLOBAL INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, while the assessee’s appeals in I

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1873/Mds/2008 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.456/Mds/2009 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1102/Mds/2011 आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.115 & 1936/Mds/2012 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2009-10 M/S M.Ct.M. Global Investments Pvt. The Assistant Commissioner Of Ltd., V. Income Tax, 761, Anna Salai, Company Circle Iv(1), Chennai - 600 002. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aabcm 9738 K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

capital gain. This Tribunal further found that the income earned by the Malaysian branch of the assessee-company is taxable in India and not taxable in Malaysia. In view of the decision of this Tribunal in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 2000- 01, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order

M.CT.M. GLOBAL INVESTMENTS P LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, while the assessee’s appeals in I

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1873/Mds/2008 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.456/Mds/2009 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1102/Mds/2011 आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.115 & 1936/Mds/2012 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2009-10 M/S M.Ct.M. Global Investments Pvt. The Assistant Commissioner Of Ltd., V. Income Tax, 761, Anna Salai, Company Circle Iv(1), Chennai - 600 002. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aabcm 9738 K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

capital gain. This Tribunal further found that the income earned by the Malaysian branch of the assessee-company is taxable in India and not taxable in Malaysia. In view of the decision of this Tribunal in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 2000- 01, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order

M/S M.CT.M. GLOBAL INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, while the assessee’s appeals in I

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1873/Mds/2008 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.456/Mds/2009 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1102/Mds/2011 आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.115 & 1936/Mds/2012 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2009-10 M/S M.Ct.M. Global Investments Pvt. The Assistant Commissioner Of Ltd., V. Income Tax, 761, Anna Salai, Company Circle Iv(1), Chennai - 600 002. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aabcm 9738 K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

capital gain. This Tribunal further found that the income earned by the Malaysian branch of the assessee-company is taxable in India and not taxable in Malaysia. In view of the decision of this Tribunal in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 2000- 01, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. M CT M GLOBAL INVESTMENTS P. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, while the assessee’s appeals in I

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1873/Mds/2008 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.456/Mds/2009 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1102/Mds/2011 आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.115 & 1936/Mds/2012 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2009-10 M/S M.Ct.M. Global Investments Pvt. The Assistant Commissioner Of Ltd., V. Income Tax, 761, Anna Salai, Company Circle Iv(1), Chennai - 600 002. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aabcm 9738 K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

capital gain. This Tribunal further found that the income earned by the Malaysian branch of the assessee-company is taxable in India and not taxable in Malaysia. In view of the decision of this Tribunal in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 2000- 01, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order

M.CT.M.GLOBAL INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, while the assessee’s appeals in I

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1873/Mds/2008 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.456/Mds/2009 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1102/Mds/2011 आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.115 & 1936/Mds/2012 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2009-10 M/S M.Ct.M. Global Investments Pvt. The Assistant Commissioner Of Ltd., V. Income Tax, 761, Anna Salai, Company Circle Iv(1), Chennai - 600 002. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aabcm 9738 K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

capital gain. This Tribunal further found that the income earned by the Malaysian branch of the assessee-company is taxable in India and not taxable in Malaysia. In view of the decision of this Tribunal in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 2000- 01, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order

M/S M.CT.M. GLOBAL INVESTMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, while the assessee’s appeals in I

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1873/Mds/2008 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.456/Mds/2009 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1102/Mds/2011 आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.115 & 1936/Mds/2012 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2009-10 M/S M.Ct.M. Global Investments Pvt. The Assistant Commissioner Of Ltd., V. Income Tax, 761, Anna Salai, Company Circle Iv(1), Chennai - 600 002. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aabcm 9738 K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

capital gain. This Tribunal further found that the income earned by the Malaysian branch of the assessee-company is taxable in India and not taxable in Malaysia. In view of the decision of this Tribunal in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 2000- 01, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. M.CT.M.GLOBAL INVESTMENTS PVT. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, while the assessee’s appeals in I

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1873/Mds/2008 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.456/Mds/2009 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1102/Mds/2011 आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.115 & 1936/Mds/2012 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2009-10 M/S M.Ct.M. Global Investments Pvt. The Assistant Commissioner Of Ltd., V. Income Tax, 761, Anna Salai, Company Circle Iv(1), Chennai - 600 002. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aabcm 9738 K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

capital gain. This Tribunal further found that the income earned by the Malaysian branch of the assessee-company is taxable in India and not taxable in Malaysia. In view of the decision of this Tribunal in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 2000- 01, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. MCTM GLOBAL INVESTMENTS PVT LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, while the assessee’s appeals in I

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamonyआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1873/Mds/2008 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.456/Mds/2009 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1102/Mds/2011 आयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.115 & 1936/Mds/2012 "नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2004-05, 2005-06, 2007-08, 2008-09 & 2009-10 M/S M.Ct.M. Global Investments Pvt. The Assistant Commissioner Of Ltd., V. Income Tax, 761, Anna Salai, Company Circle Iv(1), Chennai - 600 002. Chennai - 600 034. Pan : Aabcm 9738 K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

capital gain. This Tribunal further found that the income earned by the Malaysian branch of the assessee-company is taxable in India and not taxable in Malaysia. In view of the decision of this Tribunal in the assessee's own case for the assessment year 2000- 01, this Tribunal do not find any reason to interfere with the order

IDFC LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT COMPANY CIRCLE II(3), CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.877/Chny/2018 & 677/Chny/2020 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years: 2010-11 Idfc Limited, (Erstwhile Known As Infrastructure Vs. Income Tax, Development Finance Company Circle-Ii(3), Limited), Krm Tower, 8Th Floor, No.1, Harrington Road, Chetpet, Chennai – 600 031. Pan: Aaaci 2663N (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) The Dy. Commissioner Of Chennai. (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./ Ita No.878/Chny/2018 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Year: 2010-11 The Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Corporate Circle-2(2), Chennai Idfc Limited, (Erstwhile Known As Infrastructure Development Finance Company Vs. Limited), Krm Tower, 8Th Floor, No.1, Harrington Road, Chetpet, Chennai – 600 031. Pan: Aaaci 2663N अपीलार्थी की ओर से / Assessee By प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By सुनवाई की तारीख /Date Of Hearing : Shri Farookh V. Irani, Advocate : Shri A. Sasikumar, Cit : 23.07.2024 घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 30.09.2024

234D of the Act 7. Non-adjudication on additional ground of appeal raised during the hearing relating to allocation of interest attributable to income considered under section 36(1)(vii) and computation of deduction under section 36(1) (vii) of the Act The learned CIT(A) erred in not adjudicating on the ground pertaining to the assessing officer adopting

IDFC LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CO. CIRCLE - II (3),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.877/Chny/2018 & 677/Chny/2020 िनधा&रण वष& /Assessment Years: 2010-11

234D of the Act 7. Non-adjudication on additional ground of appeal raised during the hearing relating to allocation of interest attributable to income considered under section 36(1)(vii) and computation of deduction under section 36(1) (vii) of the Act The learned CIT(A) erred in not adjudicating on the ground pertaining to the assessing officer adopting

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI vs. IDFC LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.877/Chny/2018 & 677/Chny/2020 िनधा&रण वष& /Assessment Years: 2010-11

234D of the Act 7. Non-adjudication on additional ground of appeal raised during the hearing relating to allocation of interest attributable to income considered under section 36(1)(vii) and computation of deduction under section 36(1) (vii) of the Act The learned CIT(A) erred in not adjudicating on the ground pertaining to the assessing officer adopting

ACIT NON CORP CIRCLE 1 (1) FORMERLY KNOWN AS BUSINESS CIRCLE 1, CHENNAI vs. M/S DEOLITE HASKINS & SELLS, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

gain lvi occupation or in the practice of the profession of accountancy in India after such retirement which is in competition with that of the assessee. Thus, it is clear that the amounts to be paid under Clause 22 are in lieu o their services rendered already to the firm and for restraining themselves to carry on any competing profession

ACIT NON CORP CIRCLE 1 (1) FORMERLY KNOWN AS BUSINESS CIRCLE 1, CHENNAI vs. M/S DEOLITE HASKINS & SELLS, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

gain lvi occupation or in the practice of the profession of accountancy in India after such retirement which is in competition with that of the assessee. Thus, it is clear that the amounts to be paid under Clause 22 are in lieu o their services rendered already to the firm and for restraining themselves to carry on any competing profession

ACIT NON CORP CIRCLE 1 (1) FORMERLY KNOWN AS BUSINESS CIRCLE 1, CHENNAI vs. M/S DEOLITE HASKINS & SELLS, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Joginder Singh & Shri A.Mohan Alankamony

gain lvi occupation or in the practice of the profession of accountancy in India after such retirement which is in competition with that of the assessee. Thus, it is clear that the amounts to be paid under Clause 22 are in lieu o their services rendered already to the firm and for restraining themselves to carry on any competing profession

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE CO. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee and the revenue are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S.Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.506/Mds/2016 "नधा+रण वष+ /Assessment Year: 2012-13

234D of the Act on the excess amount refunded to the assessee while processing a return under Section 143(1) of the Act. Even though it is an interest levied on the amount refunded to the assessee, in fact, it is an interest for delayed payment of tax. In other words, the amount refunded to the assessee while processing return

SHRIRAM CITY UNION FINANCE LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee and the revenue are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri D.S.Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.506/Mds/2016 "नधा+रण वष+ /Assessment Year: 2012-13

234D of the Act on the excess amount refunded to the assessee while processing a return under Section 143(1) of the Act. Even though it is an interest levied on the amount refunded to the assessee, in fact, it is an interest for delayed payment of tax. In other words, the amount refunded to the assessee while processing return