ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CHENNAI vs. MANIKANDAN, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Ms. Padmavathy.Sआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2986/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष /Assessment Year: 2017-18 The Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Non Corporate Circle-4(1), Chennai. Manikandan, Vs. No.15/16/17, Vision Towers, 2Nd Floor, Yogam Garden, Valasarvakkam, Chennai - 600 087. Pan: Behpm 6583A (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से / Assessee By प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By Mr. R. Sivaraman, Advocate Ms. R. Anitha, Addl. Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement 11.02.2026 16.02.2026 Per Padmavathy.S, A.M: आदेश / Order This Appeal By The Revenue Is Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi, (In Short "Cit(A)") Passed U/S. 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short "The Act") Dated 26.08.2025 For Assessment Year (Ay) 2017-18. The Assessee Raised The Following Ground Of Appeal: “1. The Order Of The Ld Cit(A) Is Contrary To Law & Facts & Circumstances Of The Case. 2 The Ld Cit(A) Erred In Deleting The Addition Made By The Ao Of An Amount Of Rs.2,98,29,315/- Credited In Assessee'S Capital Account By M/S Crcl Llp, In Which Assessee Is A Partner, For Sacrificing / Relinquishing - 2 -:

2(47) of the Act as under- “transfer”, in relation to a capital asset, includes,- (i) the sale, exchange or relinquishment of the asset; or (ii) the extinguishment of any rights therein; or (iii) the compulsory acquisition thereof under any law; or - 6 -: ITA No.2986/Chny/2025 Manikandan (iv) in a case where the asset is converted by the owner thereof into

LATE S. YOGARATHINAM, REP. BY L/H Y. SHANMUGA DURAI,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1(2), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri George George Kand Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.:626/Chny/2024 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2010-11 Shri Y. Shanmuga Durai, L/H Of Acit Late S.Yogarathinam Vs. Circle -1(2) Old No.24, No.14, Chennai. 17/24, Ramanathan Street, T.Nagar, Chennai-600 017. Pan: Aakpy-9845-P (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Mr. N. Arjun Raj, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Mr. Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 06.03.2025 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 17.03.2025

vi) The deeds of settlement taken together exhibit clear case of 'exchange' and therefore, even on this count, it is a case of transfer' u/s 2(47) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. vii) As the impugned transactions through deeds of settlement are transfer as per section 2(47) of the Act, they would be chargeable to capital gains

AADARSH SURANA, CHENNAI,CHENNAI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CORPORATE CIRCLE 1(1), CHENNAI, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

gain arising on succession of the assessee's sole proprietorship concern by a company, namely M/s.Amar Prakaash Developers Private Limited, which the assessee contends is not chargeable to tax in view of the provisions of section 47(xiv) of the Act; and ii. a sum of Rs.19,83,67,287/- representing gifts and settlements received by the assessee from

N RAMASWAMY,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NON CORP WARD 2(3), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri S. Jayaramanआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.925/Chny/2019 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2014-15

47)(vi) read with Section 269UA(2)(iii)(f) of the Act, it has to be construed as acquisition of the property, hence, the assessee is eligible for exemption under Section 54F of the Act. 3. On the contrary, Shri S. Bharath, the Ld. Departmental Representative, submitted that admittedly the assessee entered into an agreement for perpetual lease for unlimited

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George

47. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. In respect of insurance companies, the profit has to be computed as per the provisions contained in the First Schedule of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 44 of the Act reads as follows:- Insurance business “44. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George

47. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. In respect of insurance companies, the profit has to be computed as per the provisions contained in the First Schedule of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 44 of the Act reads as follows:- Insurance business “44. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary

M/S. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George

47. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. In respect of insurance companies, the profit has to be computed as per the provisions contained in the First Schedule of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 44 of the Act reads as follows:- Insurance business “44. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary

M/S. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George

47. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. In respect of insurance companies, the profit has to be computed as per the provisions contained in the First Schedule of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 44 of the Act reads as follows:- Insurance business “44. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary

M/S. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George

47. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. In respect of insurance companies, the profit has to be computed as per the provisions contained in the First Schedule of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 44 of the Act reads as follows:- Insurance business “44. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George

47. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. In respect of insurance companies, the profit has to be computed as per the provisions contained in the First Schedule of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 44 of the Act reads as follows:- Insurance business “44. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary

M/S. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George

47. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. In respect of insurance companies, the profit has to be computed as per the provisions contained in the First Schedule of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 44 of the Act reads as follows:- Insurance business “44. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George

47. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. In respect of insurance companies, the profit has to be computed as per the provisions contained in the First Schedule of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 44 of the Act reads as follows:- Insurance business “44. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George

47. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. In respect of insurance companies, the profit has to be computed as per the provisions contained in the First Schedule of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 44 of the Act reads as follows:- Insurance business “44. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary

M/S. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George

47. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. In respect of insurance companies, the profit has to be computed as per the provisions contained in the First Schedule of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 44 of the Act reads as follows:- Insurance business “44. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. ROYAL SUNDARAM ALLIANCE INSURANCE CO. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George

47. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. In respect of insurance companies, the profit has to be computed as per the provisions contained in the First Schedule of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 44 of the Act reads as follows:- Insurance business “44. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1674, 1675, 1759 & 1676/Chny/2011 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04, 2004-05, 2006-07 & 2007-08 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.40/Chny/2009 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1366/Chny/2013 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2372/Chny/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S Cholamandalam Ms General Income Tax, V. Insurance Co. Ltd., Dare House, No.2, The Assistant Commissioner Of Nsc Bose Road, Income Tax. Chennai - 600 001. Large Taxpayer Unit, Chennai - 600 101. Pan : Aabcc 6633 K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

47. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. In respect of insurance companies, the profit has to be computed as per the provisions contained in the First Schedule of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 44 of the Act reads as follows:- Insurance business “44. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary

CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1674, 1675, 1759 & 1676/Chny/2011 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04, 2004-05, 2006-07 & 2007-08 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.40/Chny/2009 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1366/Chny/2013 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2372/Chny/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S Cholamandalam Ms General Income Tax, V. Insurance Co. Ltd., Dare House, No.2, The Assistant Commissioner Of Nsc Bose Road, Income Tax. Chennai - 600 001. Large Taxpayer Unit, Chennai - 600 101. Pan : Aabcc 6633 K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

47. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. In respect of insurance companies, the profit has to be computed as per the provisions contained in the First Schedule of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 44 of the Act reads as follows:- Insurance business “44. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary

CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1674, 1675, 1759 & 1676/Chny/2011 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04, 2004-05, 2006-07 & 2007-08 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.40/Chny/2009 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1366/Chny/2013 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2372/Chny/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S Cholamandalam Ms General Income Tax, V. Insurance Co. Ltd., Dare House, No.2, The Assistant Commissioner Of Nsc Bose Road, Income Tax. Chennai - 600 001. Large Taxpayer Unit, Chennai - 600 101. Pan : Aabcc 6633 K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

47. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. In respect of insurance companies, the profit has to be computed as per the provisions contained in the First Schedule of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 44 of the Act reads as follows:- Insurance business “44. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. M/S. CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the appeals filed by both the Revenue and the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. Georgeआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.1674, 1675, 1759 & 1676/Chny/2011 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2003-04, 2004-05, 2006-07 & 2007-08 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.40/Chny/2009 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2005-06 आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1366/Chny/2013 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2008-09 & आयकर अपील सं./Ita No.2372/Chny/2014 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2009-10 The Deputy Commissioner Of M/S Cholamandalam Ms General Income Tax, V. Insurance Co. Ltd., Dare House, No.2, The Assistant Commissioner Of Nsc Bose Road, Income Tax. Chennai - 600 001. Large Taxpayer Unit, Chennai - 600 101. Pan : Aabcc 6633 K (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

47. We have considered the rival submissions on either side and perused the relevant material available on record. In respect of insurance companies, the profit has to be computed as per the provisions contained in the First Schedule of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Section 44 of the Act reads as follows:- Insurance business “44. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary