ACIT, NUNAGAMBAKKAM vs. INTEGRATED SERVICE POINT LIMITED, ANNA NAGAR

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Hon'Ble Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos.1881, 1882 & 1883/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2019-20 & 2022-23 Integrated Service Point Ltd., (Formerly Integrated Service Point Vs. Income Tax, Pvt. Ltd.,) The Dy./Asst. Commissioner Of Central Circle-2(4), 6C, 6Th Floor, Gaiety Palace I/L, Blackers Road, Anna Road H.O., Chennai - 600 002. Pan: Aaaci 9527P Chennai. (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos.1874, 1876 & 1879/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2019-20 & 2022-23 The Dy./Asst. Commissioner Of Integrated Service Point Ltd., Income Tax, Central Circle-2(4), Chennai. (Formerly Integrated Service Point Vs. Pvt. Ltd.,) 6C, 6Th Floor, Gaiety Palace I/L, Blackers Road, Anna Road H.O., Chennai - 600 002. Pan: Aaaci 9527P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Mr. Y. Sridhar, Fca प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By Mr. Bipin C.N, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement 13.10.2025 30.12.2025 - : 2 -:

Bogus purchases 53,25,720 3,89,98,710 4,43,24,430 Unexplained money u/S 69A and unexplained expenditure u/S 69C Nil 39,22,000 42,30,000 39,22,000 42,30,000 Income on account of Palakol land sale 1,97,03,000 Nil 1,97,03,000 Misc. income on sale of scrap, car, candy

INTEGRATED SERVICE POINT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), CHENNAI

Accordingly, the assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos. 1881, 1882, and 1883/Chny/2025 for A.Ys. 2016-17, 2019-20, and 2022-23 are allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Hon’Ble Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos.1881, 1882 & 1883/Chny/2025 िनधा;रण वष; /Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2019-20 & 2022-23

Bogus purchases Unexplained money u/S Nil 39,22,000 39,22,000 69A and unexplained 42,30,000 42,30,000 expenditure u/S 69C Income on account of 1,97,03,000 Nil 1,97,03,000 Palakol land sale Misc. income on sale of 11,12,270 81,230 11,93,500 scrap, car, candy and pulp Total

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. INTEGRATED SERVICE POINT LIMITED, ANNA NAGAR

Accordingly, the assessee’s appeals in ITA Nos. 1881, 1882, and 1883/Chny/2025 for A.Ys. 2016-17, 2019-20, and 2022-23 are allowed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Hon’Ble Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos.1881, 1882 & 1883/Chny/2025 िनधा;रण वष; /Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2019-20 & 2022-23

Bogus purchases Unexplained money u/S Nil 39,22,000 39,22,000 69A and unexplained 42,30,000 42,30,000 expenditure u/S 69C Income on account of 1,97,03,000 Nil 1,97,03,000 Palakol land sale Misc. income on sale of 11,12,270 81,230 11,93,500 scrap, car, candy and pulp Total

INTEGRATED SERVICE POINT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CC-2(4), CHENNAI

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Hon'Ble Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos.1881, 1882 & 1883/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2019-20 & 2022-23 Integrated Service Point Ltd., (Formerly Integrated Service Point Vs. Pvt. Ltd.,) The Dy./Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(4), Chennai. 6C, 6Th Floor, Gaiety Palace I/L, Blackers Road, Anna Road H.O., Chennai - 600 002. Pan: Aaaci 9527P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos.1874, 1876 & 1879/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2019-20 & 2022-23 The Dy./Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(4), Chennai. Integrated Service Point Ltd., (Formerly Integrated Service Point Pvt. Ltd.,) Vs. 6C, 6Th Floor, Gaiety Palace I/L, Blackers Road, Anna Road H.O., Chennai - 600 002. Pan: Aaaci 9527P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Mr. Y. Sridhar, Fca प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Mr. Bipin C.N, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing घोषण की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 13.10.2025 : 30.12.2025 :- 2 -:

Bogus purchases 53,25,720 3,89,98,710 4,43,24,430 Unexplained money u/S 69A and unexplained expenditure u/S 69C Nil 39,22,000 42,30,000 39,22,000 42,30,000 Income on account of Palakol land sale 1,97,03,000 Nil 1,97,03,000 Misc. income on sale of scrap, car, candy

INTEGRATED SERVICE POINT LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(4), CHENNAI

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri Hon'Ble Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos.1881, 1882 & 1883/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2019-20 & 2022-23 Integrated Service Point Ltd., (Formerly Integrated Service Point Vs. Income Tax, Pvt. Ltd.,) The Dy./Asst. Commissioner Of Central Circle-2(4), 6C, 6Th Floor, Gaiety Palace I/L, Blackers Road, Anna Road H.O., Chennai - 600 002. Chennai. Pan: Aaaci 9527P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./ Ita Nos.1874, 1876 & 1879/Chny/2025 निर्धारण वर्ष / Assessment Years: 2016-17, 2019-20 & 2022-23 The Dy./Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle-2(4), Chennai. Integrated Service Point Ltd., (Formerly Integrated Service Point Vs. Pvt. Ltd.,) 6C, 6Th Floor, Gaiety Palace I/L, Blackers Road, Anna Road H.O., Chennai - 600 002. Pan: Aaaci 9527P (अपीलार्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Mr. Y. Sridhar, Fca प्रत्यर्थी की ओर से /Revenue By : Mr. Bipin C.N, Cit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 13.10.2025 घोषण की तारीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 30.12.2025 :- 2 -:

Bogus purchases 53,25,720 3,89,98,710 4,43,24,430 Unexplained money u/S 69A and unexplained expenditure u/S 69C Nil 39,22,000 42,30,000 39,22,000 42,30,000 Income on account of Palakol land sale 1,97,03,000 Nil 1,97,03,000 Misc. income on sale of scrap, car, candy

DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2(1), CHENNAI vs. RADIANCE REALTY DEVELOPERS INDIA LTD., CHENNAI

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Amitabh Shukla

Bogus purchase as stated by you, I request you to provide me 15 days time to reconcile the same.” request you to provide me 15 days time to reconcile the same.” request you to provide me 15 days time to reconcile the same.” 4.6 In light of the above seized electronic material, depositions of the In light of the above

KAMLESH SHANTILAL JAIN,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G.Manjunatha

purchased 10,00,000 equity shares of M/s. PS IT Infra & Services Ltd., on 16.08.2013 from M/s. Prem Sagar Vinimay Pvt .Ltd. through open offer @ ` 35 per equity share. These shares were subsequently demated and sold between 30.10.2014 and 03.12.2014 at rates ranging from ` 70 to 90 per equity share. The Assessing Officer after analyzing share price in stock market

M/S ENRICA ENTERPRISES PVT LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Manjunatha. G & Shri Manomohan Das

bogus bills from our suppliers of gift articles to generate unaccounted cash. However, we received back one third of the invoice value on an average in the form of cash from our gift article suppliers. Since this amounts to inflation of the expenditure in our books of account, we undertake to withdraw of claim towards expenditure in the respective years

M/S.ENRICA ENTERPRISES PVT LTD,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-3(4), CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

Bench: Shri Manjunatha. G & Shri Manomohan Das

bogus bills from our suppliers of gift articles to generate unaccounted cash. However, we received back one third of the invoice value on an average in the form of cash from our gift article suppliers. Since this amounts to inflation of the expenditure in our books of account, we undertake to withdraw of claim towards expenditure in the respective years

ANIL KUMAR GOEL,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, Ground Nos

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri A. Mohan Alankamony

249 ITR 306 (SC) re-assessment was based on the opinion of audit party was not permissible and was liable to be quashed. 7. At this point, it was informed to the Ld.AR that as the re-opening had two issues. One in regard to the treatment of the long term capital gains disclosed by the assessee as business income

ITO NON CORPORATE WARD 13 (5), CHENNAI vs. SHRI. G MARIA AUGUSTIN, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

purchase returns allowed by the suppliers not accounted in the books of account of the Assessee. 3.3. The CIT(A) was not correct and justified in deleting the addition towards bogus liability :: 3 :: I.T.A. No.847/Chny/2018 ignoring the ratio laid down in the following decisions: Bharat Dana Bera Vs. ITO (ITAT, Mum.) 153 ITD 421 Natural Gas Company

K.SURESH,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

bogus. Hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary.” He submitted that Supreme Court did not find that these were sufficient reasons for reopening the assessment. With regard to the sentence ‘hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary’, the Supreme Court observed that this - - 5 ITA 568 to 572/M/17 conclusion that there is a case for investigation

K.SURESH,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

bogus. Hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary.” He submitted that Supreme Court did not find that these were sufficient reasons for reopening the assessment. With regard to the sentence ‘hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary’, the Supreme Court observed that this - - 5 ITA 568 to 572/M/17 conclusion that there is a case for investigation

K.SURESH,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

bogus. Hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary.” He submitted that Supreme Court did not find that these were sufficient reasons for reopening the assessment. With regard to the sentence ‘hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary’, the Supreme Court observed that this - - 5 ITA 568 to 572/M/17 conclusion that there is a case for investigation

K.SURESH,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

bogus. Hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary.” He submitted that Supreme Court did not find that these were sufficient reasons for reopening the assessment. With regard to the sentence ‘hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary’, the Supreme Court observed that this - - 5 ITA 568 to 572/M/17 conclusion that there is a case for investigation

K.SURESH,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Chandra Poojari & Shri G. Pavan Kumar

bogus. Hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary.” He submitted that Supreme Court did not find that these were sufficient reasons for reopening the assessment. With regard to the sentence ‘hence, proper investigation regarding these loans is necessary’, the Supreme Court observed that this - - 5 ITA 568 to 572/M/17 conclusion that there is a case for investigation

NARESH PRASAD AGARWAL,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George]

bogus nor rejected by Revenue. All these, in our opinion indicate that credits in bullion margin money account could have been part of sale consideration. ITA Nos. 1447, 1448, 1988, :- 49 -: 1989, 1449 to 1455, 1485 to 1491/17. Section 68 of the Act is which apposite here is reproduced 54. hereunder:- ‘’Where any sum is found credited in the books

ACIT, CHENNAI vs. NARESH PRASAD AGARWAL, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George]

bogus nor rejected by Revenue. All these, in our opinion indicate that credits in bullion margin money account could have been part of sale consideration. ITA Nos. 1447, 1448, 1988, :- 49 -: 1989, 1449 to 1455, 1485 to 1491/17. Section 68 of the Act is which apposite here is reproduced 54. hereunder:- ‘’Where any sum is found credited in the books

SAHAI & SONS (I) LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Abraham P. George]

bogus nor rejected by Revenue. All these, in our opinion indicate that credits in bullion margin money account could have been part of sale consideration. ITA Nos. 1447, 1448, 1988, :- 49 -: 1989, 1449 to 1455, 1485 to 1491/17. Section 68 of the Act is which apposite here is reproduced 54. hereunder:- ‘’Where any sum is found credited in the books