Search: TDS | BharatTax

Search ITAT High Courts Supreme Court Phrases AI Research History

Filters

Sort by

Assessment Year

Order Date From

Order Date To

Judge Name

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

Search Judgments
Browse by Bench
Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2,750 results for “TDS”+ TDSclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai6,638 Delhi6,617 Bangalore3,128 Chennai2,750 Kolkata1,948 Pune1,347 Ahmedabad791 Patna790 Hyderabad786 Karnataka743 Jaipur532 Raipur423 Indore419 Chandigarh388 Cochin371 Nagpur321 Visakhapatnam223 Lucknow199 Cuttack181 Rajkot171 Surat169 Jodhpur128 Telangana98 Ranchi93 Panaji88 Dehradun87 Amritsar87 Agra81 Guwahati58 Jabalpur48 Kerala41 Calcutta31 SC29 Allahabad20 Varanasi12 Rajasthan10 Himachal Pradesh8 Punjab & Haryana7 Orissa5 J&K5 Uttarakhand3 A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1 Bombay1 Andhra Pradesh1 Gauhati1 KURIAN JOSEPH ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)87 Section 234E87 TDS59 Disallowance53 Addition to Income47 Section 14A43 Section 4043 Deduction32 Section 14725 Section 153A

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD-1, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3065/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025

Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

TDS Ward-1 ::3 :: applied to TDS statements pertaining to any period before applied to TDS statements

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD 1,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

Showing 1–20 of 2,750 · Page 1 of 138

...

23

Natural Justice23

ITA 3064/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025

Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

TDS Ward-1 ::3 :: applied to TDS statements pertaining to any period before applied to TDS statements

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD-1,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3061/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025

Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

TDS Ward-1 ::3 :: applied to TDS statements pertaining to any period before applied to TDS statements

PRAKASHCHAND,CHENNAI vs. ITO, TDS WARD-1,, CHENNAI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 3063/CHNY/2025[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai18 Dec 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: Mr. Hitesh, AdvocateFor Respondent: 17.12.2025

Section 154Section 200A(1)(c)Section 234ESection 3

TDS Ward-1 ::3 :: applied to TDS statements pertaining to any period before applied to TDS statements

M/S. T vs. AUTO ASSIST (INDIA) LTD.,,CHENNAIVS.ACIT, CORPORATE CIRCLE - 3 (1),, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee in I

ITA 1734/CHNY/2019[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai06 May 2022AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Mr. N.V. Balaji, AdvocateFor Respondent: Mr. ARV. Sreenivasan, Addl. CIT

Section 143(3)Section 199

TDS] amounting to Rs.6,76,061/-. For this, the following three facets were argued: I. According to the CIT(A), TDS

VNC STEEL DISTRIBUTORS,,KARUR vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(1), TRICHY

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1937/CHNY/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri S. R. Raghunatha, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./Ita No.: 1937/Chny/2024 & Stay Petition No: 40/Chny/2024 [In Ita No: 1937/Chny/2024)] िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18 Vnc Steel Distributors, Deputy Commissioner Of No.2, Industrial Estate, V. Income Tax, S. Vellalapatti, Circle -1(1), Karur – 639 004. Trichy. [Pan: Aadfv-9137-E] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/Appellant By : Shri. Abhinov Vaidyanathan, Advocate ""यथ"क"ओरसे/Respondent By : Shri. R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, Cit सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 21.08.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 14.11.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. Abhinov Vaidyanathan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri. R. Clement Ramesh Kumar, CIT

Section 194CSection 194HSection 2Section 250Section 253(1)Section 30Section 40

TDS on various expenses claimed by the assessee in respect of which TDS was not made. Subsequently, after

DCIT , TDS CIRCLE , COIMBATORE vs. M/S KOVAI MEDICAL CENTRE AND HOSPITAL LIMITED , COIMBATORE

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 1004/CHNY/2022[2015-2016]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Apr 2023AY 2015-2016

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singh, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 1004/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2015-16 Deputy Commissioner Of M/S. Kovai Medical Centre & Income Tax, V. Hospital Limited, Tds Circle, 99 Avinashi Road, Coimbatore. Coimbatore - 641 014. [Pan: Aaack-9192-L] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. M. Rajan, Cit -Dr ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By : Shri. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate

For Appellant: Shri. M. Rajan, CIT -DRFor Respondent: Shri. Vikram Vijayaraghavan, Advocate

Section 133ASection 192Section 194CSection 194JSection 201(1)

TDS has not been deducted u/s. 194J of the Act, for payment made to AMC Providers instead of TDS

M.V.A.SEETHARAMA RAJU,CHENNAI vs. DCIT NON CORPORATE CIRCLE 2, CHENNAI

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 795/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai31 Jan 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V.Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.795/Chny/2019 ("नधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2013-14) Vs Deputy Commissioner Of Income Mr. M.V.A. Seetharama Raju, Tax, Flat No.32, Rishikesh Apartments, Non-Corporate Circle-2, 38, G.N.Chetty Road, T.Nagar, Chennai. Chennai-600 017. Pan: Agopr 1931M (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: Dr. I.P.Roopa, JCIT

Section 139Section 192Section 201Section 40

TDS as per provisions of section 194A of the Act @ 10%, but not TDS @ 2% as applicable to contractors

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2017/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q4)-24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS statement, intimation is generated specifying the amount payable or refundable. This intimation generated after processing of TDS statement

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2016/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q3)-24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS statement, intimation is generated specifying the amount payable or refundable. This intimation generated after processing of TDS statement

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2018/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q2)-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS statement, intimation is generated specifying the amount payable or refundable. This intimation generated after processing of TDS statement

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2019/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q3)-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS statement, intimation is generated specifying the amount payable or refundable. This intimation generated after processing of TDS statement

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2020/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q3)-26Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS statement, intimation is generated specifying the amount payable or refundable. This intimation generated after processing of TDS statement

DOLLARS & POUNDS,CHENNAI vs. ACIT CPC TDS, GHAZIABAD

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are allowed

ITA 2015/CHNY/2018[2013-14(Q2)-24Q]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai30 Nov 2018

Bench: Shri A. Mohan Alankamony & Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy

For Respondent: Ms. G.D. Jayanthi Angayarkanni, JCIT

Section 200ASection 200A(1)Section 234E

TDS statement, intimation is generated specifying the amount payable or refundable. This intimation generated after processing of TDS statement

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD , MADURAI vs. MADURAI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK IYERBANGALOW MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 465/CHNY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS on cash withdrawals from their savings bank accounts. However, these Respondents have not deducted TDS as per law, and hence

G.VENKATESWARAN INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. M/S MADURAI DISTRIC CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 451/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS on cash withdrawals from their savings bank accounts. However, these Respondents have not deducted TDS as per law, and hence

G.VENKATESWARAN INCOMETAX OFFICER TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. M/S.MADURAI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 452/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS on cash withdrawals from their savings bank accounts. However, these Respondents have not deducted TDS as per law, and hence

G VENKATESWARAN INCOMETAX OFFICER TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. M/S MADURAI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 453/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS on cash withdrawals from their savings bank accounts. However, these Respondents have not deducted TDS as per law, and hence

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. MADURAI CO-OP BANK UTHANAMAPALAYAM BRANCH, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 454/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS on cash withdrawals from their savings bank accounts. However, these Respondents have not deducted TDS as per law, and hence

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD PALANGANATHAM BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 455/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS on cash withdrawals from their savings bank accounts. However, these Respondents have not deducted TDS as per law, and hence