BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “TDS”+ Section 56(2)(viib)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh52Mumbai26Delhi22Chennai9Bangalore5Visakhapatnam4Jaipur3Ahmedabad3Hyderabad2Agra2Indore2Kolkata2Cuttack1Pune1Raipur1Rajkot1Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)10Section 56(2)(viib)8Addition to Income8TDS7Deduction6Section 56(2)(viia)5Section 194A5Condonation of Delay5Disallowance2

M/S. AMBATTUR DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CORPORATE WARD-1(1), CHENNAI

In the result the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 2601/CHNY/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai11 Nov 2025AY 2015-16
Section 50CSection 56(2)(vii)

section 56(2)(viib) in the statute is to\ndeter generation and use of black money. The Finance Minister, while\npresenting the Budget, made it explicit that this provision, along with several\nrelated amendments, was intended to address only one mischief: the\ngeneration and use of unaccounted money.\nThe speech made in Parliament clearly sets out the objective

SRI SAKTHI TEXTILES LIMITED,COIMBATORE vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 1, COIMBATORE

In the result, appeal filed by assessee is allowed

ITA 1228/CHNY/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai01 Feb 2021AY 2013-14

Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri G.Manjunatha

Bench:

section 56(2)(viib) of the Act. The relevant findings of the Assessing Officer are as under :- “5.. Submission filed by assessee is given due consideration. 5a. the information that valuation certification was obtained from an Independent Chartered Accountant as well as, from the Statutory Auditor of the company is being submitted for the first time now. Neither during

ORAGADAM CITY DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ITO, CORPORATE WARD-5(1), CHENNAI

In the result, Addition u/s

ITA 2173/CHNY/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai23 Feb 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R.Raghunatha

For Appellant: MR. R. Sivaraman, AdvFor Respondent: Mr. Guru Prasad, Addl. CIT
Section 143(2)Section 147Section 148Section 40Section 56(2)(viib)

section 56(2)(viib), issuance of shares during the year constitutes the relevant taxable event. 3.5 Next question is whether AO can substitute DCF valuation? The crucial question is whether the AO, after the assessee adopts DCF method under Rule 11UA(2), can modify assumptions and recompute valuation. Rule 11UA(2) provides that FMV shall be: (i) as determined

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 3(2), CHENNAI vs. VENTURE LIGHTING INDIA LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 3171/CHNY/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai14 Dec 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Mahavir Singhand Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal

For Appellant: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCITFor Respondent: Shri N. Arjun Raj, CA
Section 143(3)Section 56(2)(viia)

TDS was deducted on the above said commission. The assessee also filed agreements, details of service rendered, payment made in regard to each sale i.e., calculation of commission based on invoices of sales. Even now before us, the ld. Senior DR could not controvert the above stated fact. Hence, we confirm the order of CIT(A) deleting the disallowance. Therefore

MYNAH INDUSTRIES LTD.,HOSUR vs. ITO TDS WARD, SALME

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in I

ITA 2437/CHNY/2018[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Sept 2019AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2433, 2434, 2435, 2436 & 2437/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2015-16, 2014-15, 2012-13 & 2011-12 M/S Mynah Industries Ltd., The Income Tax Officer, No.66, Mugalapalli Village, V. Tds Ward, Salem. Hosur – 635 105. The Assistant / Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pan : Aabcr 5484 M Circle(1), Hosur. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri V.M. Mahidar, JCIT
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 56(2)(viib)

56(2)(viib) of the Act towards share premium. 8. Shri V.M. Mahidar, the Ld. D.R., submitted that the assessee has received large amount of share premium to the extent of ₹45,61,32,384/-. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee has received share premium in excess of fair market value. Therefore, according to the Ld. D.R., the excess

MYNAH INDUSTRIES LTD.,HOSUR vs. ITO TDS WARD, SALME

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in I

ITA 2433/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Sept 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2433, 2434, 2435, 2436 & 2437/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2015-16, 2014-15, 2012-13 & 2011-12 M/S Mynah Industries Ltd., The Income Tax Officer, No.66, Mugalapalli Village, V. Tds Ward, Salem. Hosur – 635 105. The Assistant / Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pan : Aabcr 5484 M Circle(1), Hosur. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri V.M. Mahidar, JCIT
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 56(2)(viib)

56(2)(viib) of the Act towards share premium. 8. Shri V.M. Mahidar, the Ld. D.R., submitted that the assessee has received large amount of share premium to the extent of ₹45,61,32,384/-. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee has received share premium in excess of fair market value. Therefore, according to the Ld. D.R., the excess

MYNAH INDUSTRIES LTD.,HOSUR vs. ITO TDS WARD, SALME

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in I

ITA 2436/CHNY/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Sept 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2433, 2434, 2435, 2436 & 2437/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2015-16, 2014-15, 2012-13 & 2011-12 M/S Mynah Industries Ltd., The Income Tax Officer, No.66, Mugalapalli Village, V. Tds Ward, Salem. Hosur – 635 105. The Assistant / Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pan : Aabcr 5484 M Circle(1), Hosur. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri V.M. Mahidar, JCIT
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 56(2)(viib)

56(2)(viib) of the Act towards share premium. 8. Shri V.M. Mahidar, the Ld. D.R., submitted that the assessee has received large amount of share premium to the extent of ₹45,61,32,384/-. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee has received share premium in excess of fair market value. Therefore, according to the Ld. D.R., the excess

MYNAH INDUSTRIES LTD.,HOSUR vs. ITO TDS WARD, SALME

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in I

ITA 2434/CHNY/2018[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Sept 2019AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2433, 2434, 2435, 2436 & 2437/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2015-16, 2014-15, 2012-13 & 2011-12 M/S Mynah Industries Ltd., The Income Tax Officer, No.66, Mugalapalli Village, V. Tds Ward, Salem. Hosur – 635 105. The Assistant / Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pan : Aabcr 5484 M Circle(1), Hosur. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri V.M. Mahidar, JCIT
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 56(2)(viib)

56(2)(viib) of the Act towards share premium. 8. Shri V.M. Mahidar, the Ld. D.R., submitted that the assessee has received large amount of share premium to the extent of ₹45,61,32,384/-. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee has received share premium in excess of fair market value. Therefore, according to the Ld. D.R., the excess

MYNAH INDUSTRIES LTD.,HOSUR vs. ITO TDS WARD, SALME

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in I

ITA 2435/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai03 Sept 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.R.S. Ganesan & Shri Inturi Rama Raoआयकर अपील सं./Ita Nos.2433, 2434, 2435, 2436 & 2437/Chny/2018 "नधा"रण वष" /Assessment Years : 2014-15, 2015-16, 2014-15, 2012-13 & 2011-12 M/S Mynah Industries Ltd., The Income Tax Officer, No.66, Mugalapalli Village, V. Tds Ward, Salem. Hosur – 635 105. The Assistant / Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Pan : Aabcr 5484 M Circle(1), Hosur. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent)

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri V.M. Mahidar, JCIT
Section 194ASection 201(1)Section 56(2)(viib)

56(2)(viib) of the Act towards share premium. 8. Shri V.M. Mahidar, the Ld. D.R., submitted that the assessee has received large amount of share premium to the extent of ₹45,61,32,384/-. The Assessing Officer found that the assessee has received share premium in excess of fair market value. Therefore, according to the Ld. D.R., the excess