BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

79 results for “TDS”+ Section 198clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi308Mumbai265Bangalore177Kolkata104Karnataka87Chennai79Chandigarh58Jaipur40Lucknow39Pune35Ahmedabad29Hyderabad22Visakhapatnam16Raipur14Indore10Cuttack9Guwahati8Surat8Nagpur6Rajkot5Varanasi5Amritsar3Allahabad3SC3Rajasthan3Jodhpur3Cochin2Panaji2Ranchi2Dehradun1Kerala1

Key Topics

TDS48Section 143(3)35Addition to Income31Section 4027Section 14A22Disallowance20Section 14817Section 14717Section 37(1)14Reopening of Assessment

M/S. THE COIMBATORE DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD.,COIMBATORE vs. ITO, TDS WARD-2,, COIMBATORE

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1004/CHNY/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai12 Aug 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Aby T. Varkey & Shri Jagadishआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.1004/Chny/2025 िनधा9रण वष9 /Assessment Year: 2020-21 M/S. Coimbatore District Central The Income Tax Officer, Co-Op. Bank Ltd., Vs. Tds Ward-2 (I/C), 80, State Bank Road, Coimbatore. Coimbatore – 641 018. [Pan: Aabat 3010F]

For Appellant: Shri T.Vasudevan, Advocate
Section 133ASection 194NSection 201Section 201(1)

TDS vs Thanjavuar District Central Co-operative Bank Ld , reported in [2024] 465 ITR 286 (Madras) had occasion to examine the provision of section 194N of the Act in The Coimbatore District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd. :- 5 -: respect of similar transaction entered by many other Primary Agriculture Co-operative Societies and it has been held under : “87. Coming

Showing 1–20 of 79 · Page 1 of 4

14
Section 1111
Section 2(15)8

DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 6(1) (I/C) , CHENNAI vs. SHRIRAM CREDIT COMPANY LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1199/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1199/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Shriram Credit Company Income Tax, Corporate Circle 6(1) I/C, Limited, Shriram House, No. 4, Aayakar Bhavan, Wanaparthy Burkit Road, T. Nagar, Block, 7Th Floor, 121, M.G. Road, Chennai 600 042. Chennai 600 034. [Pan:Aagcs4497N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1307/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Shriram Credit Company Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Limited, Mookambika Complex, Income Tax, No. 4, Lady Desika Road, Corporate Circle 6(1), Mylapore, Chennai 600 004. Chennai 600 034. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) Department By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit Assessee By : Shri R.Sivaraman, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 30.03.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.04.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: Both The Appeals Filed By The Revenue As Well As Assessee Are Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 15, Chennai Dated 26.12.2017 Relevant To The Assessment

For Appellant: Shri R.Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 14A

198 and section 199 of the Act, an assessee can claim credit for TDS against the income declared. There is no provision

SHRIRAM CREDIT COMPANY LTD.,CHENNAI vs. DCIT CORPORATE CIRCLE 6(1), CHENNAI

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed and the appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1307/CHNY/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai13 Apr 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunathaआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1199/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Shriram Credit Company Income Tax, Corporate Circle 6(1) I/C, Limited, Shriram House, No. 4, Aayakar Bhavan, Wanaparthy Burkit Road, T. Nagar, Block, 7Th Floor, 121, M.G. Road, Chennai 600 042. Chennai 600 034. [Pan:Aagcs4497N] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.1307/Chny/2018 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2014-15 M/S. Shriram Credit Company Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Limited, Mookambika Complex, Income Tax, No. 4, Lady Desika Road, Corporate Circle 6(1), Mylapore, Chennai 600 004. Chennai 600 034. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent) Department By : Shri P. Sajit Kumar, Jcit Assessee By : Shri R.Sivaraman, Advocate सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 30.03.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.04.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: Both The Appeals Filed By The Revenue As Well As Assessee Are Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 15, Chennai Dated 26.12.2017 Relevant To The Assessment

For Appellant: Shri R.Sivaraman, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P. Sajit Kumar, JCIT
Section 14A

198 and section 199 of the Act, an assessee can claim credit for TDS against the income declared. There is no provision

ACIT, CENT CIRCLE-1, TRICHY vs. M/S MANGAL & MANGAL, TRICHY

In the result, appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 511/CHNY/2022[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai09 Apr 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri Manjunatha. G, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 511/Chny/2022 िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2012-13 The Assistant Commissioner Of M/S. Mangal & Mangal, Income Tax, V. 25, N.S.B. Road, Teppakulam, Central Circle -2, Trichy – 620 002. No. 44, Williams Road, [Pan: Aaifm-3378-B] Cantonment, Trichy – 620 001. (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate : Shri. Nlay Baran Som, Cit ""यथ" क" ओर से/Respondent By सुनवाई क" तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 06.02.2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 09.04.2024 आदेश /O R D E R

For Appellant: Shri. S. Sridhar, Advocate
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148

198/-, on which TDS applicable as per provisions of section 194C of the Act was not deducted. The Assessing Officer

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. MADURAI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK ANNA NAGAR BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 466/CHNY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198

G.VENKATESWARAN INCOME TAX OFFICER TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. M/S MADURAI DISTRIC CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 451/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD , MADURAI vs. MADURAI CENTRAL CO-OP BANK BODINAYAKANUR BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 467/CHNY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. MADURAI CO-OP BANK UTHANAMAPALAYAM BRANCH, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 454/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. MADURAI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK ANUDIPATTI BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 468/CHNY/2022[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD PALANGANATHAM BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 455/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD NAGAMALAI PUDUKOTTAI BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 456/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD PUDUR BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 457/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. MADURAI CO-OP BANK LTD MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 458/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. MADURAI DISTRICT CO-OP BANK MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 459/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. CENTRAL CO-OP BANK THIRUPARANKUNDRAM BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 462/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198

G VENKATESWARAN INCOMETAX OFFICER TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. M/S MADURAI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 453/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD VILLAPURAM BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 461/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. CENTRAL CO-OP BANK KRISHNAPURAM COLONY BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 463/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198

G VENKATESWARAN ITO TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. CENTRAL CO-OP BANK OTTHAKADAI BRANCH MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 464/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198

G.VENKATESWARAN INCOMETAX OFFICER TDS WARD MADURAI, MADURAI vs. M/S MADURAI DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP BANK LTD MADURAI, MADURAI

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue are

ITA 460/CHNY/2022[2020-2021]Status: DisposedITAT Chennai29 Jun 2022AY 2020-2021

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri G. Manjunatha

TDS in terms of the provisions introduced by the Legislature and that has not been held as ultravires yet. 4.Whether the CIT(A) has erred in not appreciating the fact that the deductor cannot decide the taxability of the amount to be distributed to the Payees. 5. Whether the CIT(A) erred in not appreciating Section 198