M/S. THE COIMBATORE DISTRICT CENTRAL CO-OP. BANK LTD.,COIMBATORE vs. ITO, TDS WARD-2,, COIMBATORE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the assessee's argument that PACCS acted as agents or business correspondents and thus the transactions were excluded from Section 194N was not supported by evidence. The exclusion under the proviso to Section 194N for business correspondents was reversed.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative bank, did not deduct TDS under Section 194N on cash withdrawals exceeding Rs. 1 crore made by Primary Agricultural Cooperative Societies (PACCS) for disbursing government schemes like Pongal gift hampers. The AO treated the assessee in default, raising a demand for TDS and interest.
What were the issues?
Whether TDS under Section 194N was applicable on cash withdrawals by cooperative societies acting as conduits for government scheme disbursements, and if they qualified for exclusions as business correspondents.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 133A(2A),Section 194N,Section 201,Section 201(1A),Section 192,Section 198
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Hindustan Coca Cola Beverage Pvt. Ltd. v. CIT576 citing163 Taxmann 355 · 2007 · SC
- CIT v. Vasisth Chay Vyapar Ltd.63 citing253 Taxmann 401 · 2019 · SC
- COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX v. VASISTH CHAY VYAAR LIMITED15 citing90 Taxmann.com 365 · 2018 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI JAGADISH
PER JAGADISH, A.M : Aforesaid appeal filed by the assessee for Assessment Year (AY) 2020-21 arises out of the order of Learned Commissioner of Income Tax, Appeal, Addl./JCIT(A)-2, Mumbai [hereinafter “Addl. CIT(A)”] dated 10.02.2025 in the matter of assessment framed by the Assessing Officer [AO] u/s. 201/201(1A) of the Income-tax Act,1961 (hereinafter “the Act”) on 12.03.2020. The Coimbatore District Central Co-op. Bank Ltd. :- 2 -:
The
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 133A(2A)
- Grid Solutions Oy Limited, Finland, Foreign vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1049/DEL/2025[2022-23]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2022-23
- Greeneffect Waste Management Limited… vs ITO, Ward-73(2), New DelhiITA 3400/DEL/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed14 Sept 2026AY 2018-19
- Chief Medical and Health Officer, Ratlam vs DCIT, TDS, IndoreITA 10/IND/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed25 Aug 2026AY 2016-17
- G.C.S. Computer Technology Private Limited… vs ITO Ward-4, Patiala, PunjabITA 711/CHANDI/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2019-20
- G.C.S. Computer Technology Private Limited… vs ITO Ward-4, Patiala, PunjabITA 710/CHANDI/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed5 Aug 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetanj Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Namita Behera vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Ratul Boro vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Jashwant Sharma vs. The Union Of INDIA And A4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026