THE LIC EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are stands allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaraman

TDS on the interest paid on the deposits by Co-operative societies involved in banking business. 5. We have considered the rival submissions. As it is noticed that the issues in the appeals are squarely covered by the decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court (Madras) in the case of M/s.Coimbatore Central ITA Nos.823 to 826/Mds/2017 :- 3 -: Co-operative

THE LIC EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are stands allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaraman

TDS on the interest paid on the deposits by Co-operative societies involved in banking business. 5. We have considered the rival submissions. As it is noticed that the issues in the appeals are squarely covered by the decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court (Madras) in the case of M/s.Coimbatore Central ITA Nos.823 to 826/Mds/2017 :- 3 -: Co-operative

THE LIC EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are stands allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaraman

TDS on the interest paid on the deposits by Co-operative societies involved in banking business. 5. We have considered the rival submissions. As it is noticed that the issues in the appeals are squarely covered by the decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court (Madras) in the case of M/s.Coimbatore Central ITA Nos.823 to 826/Mds/2017 :- 3 -: Co-operative

THE LIC EMPLOYEES CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD.,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are stands allowed

Bench: Shri George Mathan & Shri S. Jayaraman

TDS on the interest paid on the deposits by Co-operative societies involved in banking business. 5. We have considered the rival submissions. As it is noticed that the issues in the appeals are squarely covered by the decision of the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court (Madras) in the case of M/s.Coimbatore Central ITA Nos.823 to 826/Mds/2017 :- 3 -: Co-operative

METTUR MUNICIPALITY,SALEM vs. ITO (TDS) , SALEM

In the result both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 758 & 759/Chny/2025 धनिाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2023-24, 2024-25 Mettur Municipality Income Tax Officer (Tds) Salem. Municipality Office Road, Mettur Dam, Vs. Salem – 636 401. Tamil Nadu [Pan: Aaalm2764R] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. S. Bhupendran, Advocate. प्रत्यथी की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 04.06.2025 घोर्णा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 12.08.2025

TDS [Page Nos.163 to 182 of Paper-book for AY 2023-24, Page Nos.231 to 250 of Paper-book for AY 2024-25]; 35. The Bangalore ITAT discussed the shareholding of KUIDFC only in so far as applicability of Section 194A(3

METTUR MUNICIPALITY,SALEM vs. ITO (TDS), SALEM

In the result both the appeals of the assessee are allowed

Bench: Shri Manu Kumar Giri & Shri S.R. Raghunathaआयकर अपील सं./Ita No.: 758 & 759/Chny/2025 धनिाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2023-24, 2024-25 Mettur Municipality Income Tax Officer (Tds) Salem. Municipality Office Road, Mettur Dam, Vs. Salem – 636 401. Tamil Nadu [Pan: Aaalm2764R] (अपीलाथी/Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/Respondent) अपीलाथी की ओर से/Appellant By : Shri. S. Bhupendran, Advocate. प्रत्यथी की ओर से/Respondent By : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, Jcit सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing : 04.06.2025 घोर्णा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 12.08.2025

TDS [Page Nos.163 to 182 of Paper-book for AY 2023-24, Page Nos.231 to 250 of Paper-book for AY 2024-25]; 35. The Bangalore ITAT discussed the shareholding of KUIDFC only in so far as applicability of Section 194A(3

INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,LTU(2), CHENNAI

Accordingly, this ground of Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giriआयकरअपील सं./ Ita Nos.661/Chny/2019, 202 & 203/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-2018) Indian Overseas Bank, Vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of 763, Anna Salai, Income Tax, Chennai 600 002. Ltu (2) Chennai. आयकरअपील सं./ Ita Nos.914/Chny/2019, 253 & 254/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Years: 2015-16, 2016-17&2017-2018) The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. Indian Overseas Bank, Income Tax, 763, Anna Salai, Ltu (2) Chennai 600 002. Chennai. [Pan: Aaaci 1223J] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) Assessee By : Shri. C. Naresh, C.A., Department By : Shri. A. Sasikumar, Irs. Cit. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 14.11.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 31.12.2024

3) of section 194A, deals with such entities. The said clause reads as under:- iii) to such income credited or paid to- (a) any banking company to which the Banking Regulation Act, 1949 (10 of 1949), applies, or any co-operative society engaged in carrying on the business of banking (including a co-operative land mortgage bank

COONOOR COOPERATIVE URBANK BANK LIMITED,COONOOR vs. DCIT,, OOTY

In the result, the appeal of the assesseein ITA No

Bench: Hon’Ble Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwal, Am & Hon’Ble Shri Manu Kumar Giri, Jm आयकरअपील सं./ Ita No.228/Chny/2023 (िनधा"रणवष" / Assessment Year: 2014-2015) Coonoor Co-Operative Urban Bank Vs. The Deputy Commissioner Of Limited, Income Tax, No.15, Mount Road, Circle I, Coonoor. Ooty. [Pan: Aaaac 0793M] (अपीलाथ"/Appellant) (""यथ"/Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Miss N.V. Lakshmi, Advocate ""यथ" क" ओर से /Respondent By : Shri. Arv Srinivasan, Irs, Addl. Cit. सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of Hearing : 20.06.2024 घोषणा क" तार"ख /Date Of Pronouncement : 27.08.2024 आदेश / O R D E R Per Manu Kumar Giri ()

TDS at applicable rate. (iv) Disallowance of Rs.48,76,149/- being contribution unrecognized staff provident fund by employee. (v) Disallowance u/s.40 (a)(ia) of Rs.4,82,97,933/- interest paid on various deposits for want of Tax Deduction at source on ground of applicability of Section 194A (1)’’. 3

DCIT, CC-2,, MADURAI vs. SHRI V. MANOHARAN,, RAMNAD

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue and the CO filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri Manoj Kumar Aggarwalआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.3246/Chny/2019 िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2016-17 & C.O. No. 2/Chny/2021 [In I.T.A. No.3246/Chny/2019] The Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. Shri V. Manoharan, Income Tax, D. No. 99/2, Maharnonbu Ground Road, Central Circle 2, Madurai. Near Velumanickam Theatre, Ramnad 632 501. [Pan: Acspm0189J] (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""थ"/Respondent/Cross Objector) Department By : Shri Ar.V. Sreenivasan, Addl. Cit Assessee By : None सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 27.06.2022 घोषणा की तारीख /Date Of Pronouncement : 13.07.2022 आदेश /O R D E R Per V. Durga Rao: The Appeal Filed By The Revenue & The Cross Objection Filed By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Order Of The Ld. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) 19, Chennai, Dated 14.08.2019 Relevant To The Assessment Year 2016-17. The Revenue Has Raised The Following Grounds: “1. The Order Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) Is Erroneous On Facts Of The Case & In Law.

3. Aggrieved, the Revenue is in appeal before the Tribunal. By referring to the grounds of appeal, the ld. DR has submitted that the turnover of the assessee during the relevant year was to the tune of ₹.2,43,88,213/-. It was further submission that as the turnover limit for compulsory audit under section 44AB

SIVA INDUSTRIES AND HOLDINGS LIMITED,CHENNAI vs. DCIT, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA No 1392/2016 for the

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaraman

TDS certificate deducting tax u/s 194A treating it as an interest. Therefore, the A O taxed the proportionate interest of Rs.30,10,00,000/- as income of the assessee. 4. Before the ld CIT(A) , the assessee submitted that its intention was to derive value of a large project and M/s Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. decided not to sell

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. SIVA VENTURES LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA No 1392/2016 for the

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaraman

TDS certificate deducting tax u/s 194A treating it as an interest. Therefore, the A O taxed the proportionate interest of Rs.30,10,00,000/- as income of the assessee. 4. Before the ld CIT(A) , the assessee submitted that its intention was to derive value of a large project and M/s Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. decided not to sell

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. SIVA VENTURES LIMITED, CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA No 1392/2016 for the

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaraman

TDS certificate deducting tax u/s 194A treating it as an interest. Therefore, the A O taxed the proportionate interest of Rs.30,10,00,000/- as income of the assessee. 4. Before the ld CIT(A) , the assessee submitted that its intention was to derive value of a large project and M/s Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. decided not to sell

DCIT, CHENNAI vs. SIVA VENTURES LTD., CHENNAI

In the result, the assessee’s appeals in ITA No 1392/2016 for the

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S. Jayaraman

TDS certificate deducting tax u/s 194A treating it as an interest. Therefore, the A O taxed the proportionate interest of Rs.30,10,00,000/- as income of the assessee. 4. Before the ld CIT(A) , the assessee submitted that its intention was to derive value of a large project and M/s Sahara India Commercial Corporation Ltd. decided not to sell

INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK,CHENNAI vs. ACIT LTU-2, CHENNAI

194A(1) shall not apply if the payment\nhas been made to certain entities. Clause (iii) of sub-section (3) of section\n194A, deals with such entities. The said clause reads as under:-\niii) to such income credited or paid to-\n(a) any banking company which the Banking Regulation Act,\n1949 (10 of 1949), applies, or any co-operative

INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK,CHENNAI vs. DCIT,LTU(2), CHENNAI

194A(1) shall not apply if the payment\nhas been made to certain entities. Clause (iii) of sub-section (3) of section\n194A, deals with such entities. The said clause reads as under:-\niii) to such income credited or paid to-\n(a) any banking company which the Banking Regulation Act,\n1949 (10 of 1949), applies, or any co-operative

ACIT LTU-2, CHENNAI vs. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, CHENNAI

194A(1) shall not apply if the payment\nhas been made to certain entities. Clause (iii) of sub-section (3) of section\n194A, deals with such entities. The said clause reads as under:-\niii) to such income credited or paid to-\n(a) any banking company which the Banking Regulation Act,\n1949 (10 of 1949), applies, or any co-operative

ACIT, NON-CORPORATE CIRLE-8, CHENNAI vs. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, CHENNAI

194A(1) shall not apply if the payment\nhas been made to certain entities. Clause (iii) of sub-section (3) of section\n194A, deals with such entities. The said clause reads as under:-\niii) to such income credited or paid to-\n(a) any banking company which the Banking Regulation Act,\n1949 (10 of 1949), applies, or any co-operative

ACIT, NON-CORPORATE CIRLE-8, CHENNAI vs. INDIAN OVERSEAS BANK, CHENNAI

194A(1) shall not apply if the payment\nhas been made to certain entities. Clause (iii) of sub-section (3) of section\n194A, deals with such entities. The said clause reads as under:-\niii) to such income credited or paid to-\n(a) any banking company which the Banking Regulation Act,\n1949 (10 of 1949), applies, or any co-operative