BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

21 results for “section 68”+ Section 43Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi471Mumbai445Kolkata203Chennai132Ahmedabad130Bangalore122Agra67Jaipur63Pune62Hyderabad56Raipur49Visakhapatnam36Lucknow29Cuttack29Cochin22Chandigarh21Indore17Surat16Nagpur11Rajkot10Guwahati10Jodhpur8Varanasi6Allahabad6Jabalpur5Ranchi3SC3Karnataka3Dehradun2Amritsar2Patna1

Key Topics

Addition to Income12Section 36(1)(va)11Section 14410Section 143(1)9Section 43B8Disallowance8Section 139(1)6Section 365Section 143(2)4Section 68

M/S GOLD STAR AMCO STEELS PVT. LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. DCIT, C-1, LUDHIANA

In the results, the book results as duly audited need to be accepted and the addition so made is hereby directed to be deleted

ITA 1164/CHANDI/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Jun 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: 30Th Of September 2013 And, As Such, Framing Of Assessment By The Assessing Officer Without Observing Mandatory

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manveet Singh Sehgal, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 68

section 68 and in view of the same, both the additions so made by the AO are hereby directed to be deleted. 8.14 In the result, the ground no. 3 of the assessee’s appeal is allowed and ground no. 1 of the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed. 9. In Ground No. 4, the assessee had challenged the sustenance

DCIT, C-1, LUDHIANA vs. M/S GOLD STAR AMCO STEELS PVT. LTD., LUDHIANA

Showing 1–20 of 21 · Page 1 of 2

4
Depreciation2
Deduction2

In the results, the book results as duly audited need to be accepted and the addition so made is hereby directed to be deleted

ITA 1198/CHANDI/2017[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Jun 2024AY 2012-13

Bench: 30Th Of September 2013 And, As Such, Framing Of Assessment By The Assessing Officer Without Observing Mandatory

For Appellant: Shri Sudhir Sehgal, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manveet Singh Sehgal, Sr. DR
Section 143(2)Section 144Section 68

section 68 and in view of the same, both the additions so made by the AO are hereby directed to be deleted. 8.14 In the result, the ground no. 3 of the assessee’s appeal is allowed and ground no. 1 of the Revenue’s appeal is dismissed. 9. In Ground No. 4, the assessee had challenged the sustenance

SARASWATI AGRO CHEMICALS (INDIA) PVT.LTD,MOHALI vs. DCIT,CPC/ DCIT CIRCLE -6(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 158/CHANDI/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh12 Jan 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: The Filing Of Return Of Income.” 3. The Ld. Ar Inviting Attention To The Impugned Order

For Appellant: Shri Akshun Gupta,CAFor Respondent: Shri Ashok Khanna, Addl. CIT
Section 143(1)Section 250(6)Section 43B

68,698/-) for deposit of employee's contribution towards Provident Fund and ESI after the due date specified under the respective Acts of PF and ESI. The amount of contribution has been deposited well before the filing of return of income.” 3. The ld. AR inviting attention to the impugned order submitted that the point at issue is fully covered

M/S PUNJAB SMALL INDUSTRIES AND EXPORTS CORPORATION LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal of the Assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 556/CHANDI/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Jun 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri A.D. Jain & Dr Krinwant Sahayआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 556/Chd/2022 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years : 2019-20 M/S Punjab Small Industries & Vs. The Dcit / Acit, Export Corporation Ltd., बनाम Circle 2(1), Udyog Bhawan, 3Rd To 6Th Floor, Chandigarh Sector 17-A, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aabcp1602M अपीलाथ"/ Appellant ""यथ"/ Repsondent ( Hybrid Hearing )

For Appellant: Sh. Vineet Krishan, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Manpreet Duggal, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)Section 43Section 43B

68,84,636/- under section 43B of the Income Tax Act. 1961. 4. The ld. DR relied on the order

MR. RAM PAL SINGH,CHANDIGARH vs. ITO WARD 5(4), CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 387/CHANDI/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh14 Feb 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini & Shri Sudhanshu Srivastavaआयकर अपील सं./ Ita No. 387/Chd/2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19 Mr. Ram Pal Singh, The Ito, Ward-5(4), बनाम Sco 68, Chandigarh Ist Floor, Sec. 40-C, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Bawps7303F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent

For Appellant: Sh. Anil Batra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, CIT DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250(6)Section 36(1)(va)Section 40Section 43B

68, Chandigarh Ist Floor, Sec. 40-C, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: BAWPS7303F अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent Hearing though video Conferencing "नधा"रती क ओर से/Assessee by : Sh. Anil Batra, Advocate राज"व क ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, CIT DR सुनवाई क तार%ख/Date of Hearing : 14.02.2022 उदघोषणा क तार%ख/Date of Pronouncement

ATUL GLOBAL PVT.LTD.,LUDHIANA vs. ITO-WARD-1(1), LUDHIANA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 302/CHANDI/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Jan 2022AY 2019-20
For Appellant: Smt. Monvica Kaushal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Priyanka Dhar, Sr. DR

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

SANDEEP PURI,PATIALA vs. ITO WARD -4,, PATIALA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 404/CHANDI/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Jan 2022AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Smt. Monvica Kaushal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Priyanka Dhar, Sr. DR

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

DOUBLE KNITWEAR,LUDHIANA vs. ITO WARD 3(1), LUDHIANA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 375/CHANDI/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Jan 2022AY 2019-20
For Appellant: Smt. Monvica Kaushal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Priyanka Dhar, Sr. DR

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

DS MULTIMEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,PANCHKULA vs. DCIT,CPC/ITO WARD-1, PANCHKULA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 317/CHANDI/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Jan 2022AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Smt. Monvica Kaushal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Priyanka Dhar, Sr. DR

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

M/S PACIFIC ENGINEERS,MOHALI vs. ADIT,CPC, BENGALURU/ITO WARD 6(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 359/CHANDI/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Jan 2022AY 2019-20
For Appellant: Smt. Monvica Kaushal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Priyanka Dhar, Sr. DR

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

M/S PACIFIC ENGINEERS,MOHALI vs. ADIT,CPC, BENGALURU/ITO WARD 6(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 358/CHANDI/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Jan 2022AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Smt. Monvica Kaushal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Priyanka Dhar, Sr. DR

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

CHERRY CHIK HATCHERIES PRIVATE LIMITED,MALERKOTLA vs. ITO WARD - 1,, MALERKOTLA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 380/CHANDI/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Jan 2022AY 2019-20
For Appellant: Smt. Monvica Kaushal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Priyanka Dhar, Sr. DR

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

M/S OVER AND ABOVE SOFTWARE AND INFRASTRUCTURE SOLUTION (OASIS),MOHALI vs. ITO, WARD 6(1),, MOHALI

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 397/CHANDI/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Jan 2022AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Smt. Monvica Kaushal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Priyanka Dhar, Sr. DR

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

PERIDOT KNITWEARS PRIVATE LIMITED,LUDHIANA vs. ITO WARD -7(5),, LUDHIANA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 381/CHANDI/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh27 Jan 2022AY 2018-19
For Appellant: Smt. Monvica Kaushal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Priyanka Dhar, Sr. DR

68, SAS Nagar, Mohali C/o Parikshit Aggarwal, Chartered 160062, Punjab Accountant, H.No. 1238, Sector 22B, Chandigarh "थायी लेखा सं./PAN NO: AABFO7316A अपीलाथ"/Appellant ""यथ"/Respondent "नधा"रती क" ओर से/Assessee by : Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CA राज"व क" ओर से/ Revenue by : Dr. Ranjeet Kaur, Sr. DR आयकर अपील सं./ ITA No. 404/Chd/ 2021 "नधा"रण वष" / Assessment

M/S A.K. CREATIVE OUTSOURCING SERVICES PVT.LTD,BADDI vs. DCIT,CPC/ITO, SOLAN

The appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 252/CHANDI/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh16 Nov 2021AY 2017-18
For Appellant: Shri Parikshit Aggarwal, CAFor Respondent: Smt. Priyanka Dhar, JCIT
Section 139(1)Section 250(6)Section 36Section 43B

68,410/- u/s 36(l)(va) of the Act even when the appellant collected ESI and PF from salary of the employees and whole of the amount had been,' deposited well before the due date of filing of Income Tax Return.” 3. The ld. AR submits that the issue is fully covered in favour of the assessee by virtue

SHAKTI APIFOODS PRIVATE LIMITED,SANGRUR vs. ADIT,CPC/ DCIT-CIRCLE-IV, LUDHIANA

In the result, the addition so made towards the provision for gratuity amounting to Rs

ITA 272/CHANDI/2021[2019-2020]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh11 Jan 2022AY 2019-2020

Bench: Smt.Diva Singh & Shri Vikram Singh Yadavshakti Apifoods Private Limited. बनाम The Assessing Officer, Malerkotla Road, Circle-Iv(1), Sangrur. Ludhiana. "थायी लेखा सं./Pan No: Aamcs8546C

For Appellant: Shri Navneet Sehgal, CAFor Respondent: Dr.Ranjit Kaur, Sr.DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)

68,124/- towards late deposit of employees’ contribution to ESI & PF 3 A.Y.2019-20 and an amount of Rs.11,14,217/- on account of provision for gratuity. 3. On appeal, the Ld.CIT(A), NFAC has confirmed both the disallowances and against the said order, the assessee has now come up in appeal before us. 4. During the course of hearing

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, MANDI GOBINDGARH, HQ SIRHIND vs. NEW FATEHGARH SAHIB SIRHIND BUS TRANSPORT PVT. LTD., SIRHIND

In the result the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 470/CHANDI/2023[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh05 Jul 2024AY 2019-20

Bench: The Due Date Under Section 139(1) Of The Act, The Cpc Has Relied

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri Dharam Vir, JCIT, Sr.DR
Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 154Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

Section 43B where the due date is taken of filing of ITR would not come to the rescue of the assessee. The decision of Supreme Court is dated 12.10.2022 in Civil Appeal No. 2833 of 2016. Hence, point of law in favour of Department. Therefore, delay should be condoned and appeal be allowed and impugned order be set aside

IND SWIFT LABORATORIES LTD.,CHANDIGARH vs. DCIT, CIRCLE 1(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, the appeal is allowed, as indicated

ITA 350/CHANDI/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh04 Jun 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI A.D.JAIN (Vice President), SHRI KRINWANT SAHAY (Accountant Member)

For Appellant: Shri T.N.Singla, C.AFor Respondent: Shri Rohit Sharma, CIT-DR
Section 250Section 35Section 35(1)Section 35(1)(i)Section 35(2)

43B, as available from the income tax return; that it was thus, that net interest of Rs.8.77 crore was claimed as expense of interest during the year; that therefore, disallowance, if any, of proportionate notional interest at Average to Total Assets can be made only out of the interest of Rs.8.77 crore claimed by the assessee as interest expenditure during

DSM SINOCHEM PHARMACEUTICALS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,NAWANSHAHR vs. DCIT, CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 253/CHANDI/2016[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Jan 2022AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini, Vice- & Shri Vikas Awasthyआअसं. 253/ चंडीगढ़/2016(िन.व. 2011-12)

For Appellant: Sh.K.M Gupta, Adv., Sh. NishantFor Respondent: Sh. Vikram Batra, CIT-DR
Section 144

68 2.56% 1.74 million Crores LC/Guarantee EUR 30 204 3.50% 7.14 million Crores Total 8.88 Your honour would appreciate from the above that the services availed by DSM India resulted in benefit to the assessee and indeed added economic and commercial value to the business of the assessee. In case these services were not provided by the AEs the assessee

M/S DSM SINOCHEM PHARMACEUTICALS INDIA PVT. LTD. ,TOANSA vs. DCIT, C-1(1), CHANDIGARH

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 1592/CHANDI/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Chandigarh20 Jan 2022AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri N.K. Saini, Vice- & Shri Vikas Awasthyआअसं. 253/ चंडीगढ़/2016(िन.व. 2011-12)

For Appellant: Sh.K.M Gupta, Adv., Sh. NishantFor Respondent: Sh. Vikram Batra, CIT-DR
Section 144

68 2.56% 1.74 million Crores LC/Guarantee EUR 30 204 3.50% 7.14 million Crores Total 8.88 Your honour would appreciate from the above that the services availed by DSM India resulted in benefit to the assessee and indeed added economic and commercial value to the business of the assessee. In case these services were not provided by the AEs the assessee